Wakefield Has Company
by Judy Converse, MPH RD LD
Is there a vaccine-autism link? Is Andy Wakefield a crazy man? The gap
I see, as a nutrition professional who has worked with children with
autism for twelve years, is in a willingness to open our minds, to
consider studies that corroborate Wakefield’s work. I am weary of doing
the literature search over and over, handing out these links (below)
again and again – the ones the media ignore so handily. Your
pediatrician likely doesn’t know that Wakefield is not alone. I
challenge physicians out there to pause, breathe, read the studies, and
wonder. Think it through: What if he’s right?
I notice that most doctors, parents, journalists and bloggers who are
shouting about what a fraud Dr. Wakefield is are more voyeurs on the
autism controversy than anything else. Most often, they don’t see many
patients with autism, don’t treat them for anything beyond prescribing
Miralax or Abilify, or aren’t raising children with autism themselves.
Or maybe I should say, they don’t see their poop, their growth charts,
endoscopy reports, stool cultures, or food intakes. They don’t see how
physically ill these children are, up close and stinky. How many autism
diapers have they changed? You know, the ones with the explosive gold
lumpy liquid that soars up the child’s neck and seeps down to his
knees, six or eight times a day? How many toilets have they unclogged
or replaced, after one too many enormous, stone-hard stools filled it?
How many impacted colons have they cleared in young children with
autism? How many failure to thrive children with autism have they
worked with, to restore normal nutrition status and good health? This
is what I’m mucking through at work on a regular basis as I provide
nutrition care. Either in a child’s history, parent interview, or in a
kid’s pants right in my office. Do I want to see it, mom asks? Why, yes
I do, I always answer. And I want to culture it too. So off we go
collecting that stool sample, right then and there. Let’s do something
about it.
Let’s do something about the myths relentlessly repeated now about measles and Andrew Wakefield too.
First, there are fewer, not more, children getting measles in the UK
since Andrew Wakefield voiced his concerns for the bundled MMR vaccine.
See this analysis for data on measles cases pre and post Wakefield.
And, no, your child is not certain to die from measles if unvaccinated
against it, unless he happens to be in profoundly weak status for
vitamin A, iron, protein, and body mass index. Those nutrition
parameters are strong predictors of how children manage most any
infectious disease, and measles in particular. They are so strong, in
fact, that protocols for using vitamin A to prevent and treat measles
have long existed for UNICEF and the World Health Organization. A child
in strong nutrition status typically passes through measles quickly
with no lasting ill effect, and then has permanent immunity. This does
not mean children never catch or die of measles. It does mean that
measles is a highly survivable routine illness that healthy,
well-nourished children overwhelmingly survived in the pre-vaccine era
– just as my siblings did, who passed immunity to me.
Thirdly, I would also point out (groan, again) that Wakefield’s
infamous original Lancet article was a case series. Which means, it did
not test a hypothesis that MMR causes autism, nor did it intend to. It
did not state this at all, as the media relentlessly hypes. I wonder
how many MDs have actually read this original article, or even know the
findings published there. The real tragedy is that the message of that
original case series has been long lost in the sensationalist media
cacophony. Again, think: What if he’s right? Would Pharma, CDC, FDA,
AAP, ACIP, UK GMC, and NIH stand up and say – “Oops. We’re sorry.”
Would the US go into even greater financial arrears, to pay the
hundreds of thousands of injured families the billions they would be
due?
These are colossally powerful, profitable entities. If there is trouble
with bundled vaccines like MMR, what a tidy solution if Wakefiled is
indeed a monster and a fraud. But I don’t think he is, after reviewing
food intakes, GI sx, growth patterns, medical histories, and
developmental histories on hundreds of children with autism.
Enough lamenting. I’m always asked, so here are some citations for the
uninitiated. Wakefield has company. Can all these journals and authors
be wrong as well? Here’s one that I can’t link to because it has
vanished from PubMed (hmmm it was there two days ago), so here is the
full citation:
Sheils O, Smyth P, Martin C, O’Leary JJ. Development of an ‘allelic
discrimination’ type assay to differentiate between the strain origins
of measles virus detected in intestinal tissue of children with
ileocolonic lymphonodular hyperplasia and concomitant developmental
disorder. J Pathol 2002; 198 (suppl): 5A.
Wakefield’s company includes other researchers, and other vaccines
beyond the MMR. For example, hepatitis B vaccine at birth was found to
triple risk for autism in this retrospective study
http://bit.ly/rKeth A horrifying vindication for a book I published in
2002 When Your Doctor Is Wrong: Hepatitis B Vaccine & Autism.
This one shows a “hyperimmune” response to MMR in children with autism: http://bit.ly/fXmchZ
Oh alright, I will keep going…Here’s a 2010 chart review finding ileal
or colonic lymphonodular hyperplasia in 73% of subjects with autism
http://bit.ly/cr0HAL and this one saw a strong association between MMR
vaccination and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism
http://bit.ly/eTH7Vg and this one documents intestinal permeability
(“leaky gut”) occuring 7x more frequently in subjects with autism
compared to controls http://bit.ly/aYirdO ..Here’s a page with
over twenty citations and analysis collected in one spot for
MMR-autism: http://www.jabs.org.uk/pages/thrower.asp
Okay I’ll stop. There is more, you can keep going down this rabbit hole
if you like. You’ll find Wakefield has plenty of company.
Lastly, we never hear much about this study, perhaps the most chilling
of all. It is the only one to date that reviews the immunization
schedule as it is given to human infants – something the FDA never
required anybody to do before allowing our children to be given dozens
of vaccines in a short time span, as many as twelve or fifteen in one
day, as I have seen on my patients’ vaccine records. It was a
prospective case controlled study with primates, the closest animal
model to humans that we can use. Do you know the outcome? Read it and
weep, for our children. They are not victims of Wakefield. They are
victims of ignorance and greed. We owe them more research, solutions to
the neurodevelopmental disorders and autism they now suffer in
unprecedented numbers, and truth.