01.08.2002
By MARTIN JOHNSTON health reporter
Auckland health chiefs are questioning the Government's $200 million
plan to wipe out meningococcal disease by mass vaccination.
The money will be spent over five years.
Clinical trials of a vaccine specifically targeting New Zealand's B
strain of the deadly bug began in May.
If these prove the vaccine is safe and effective, the Health Ministry
hopes to begin a pilot vaccination programme in South Auckland in April.
It aims to start mass vaccination of all under-20-year-olds
nationwide in 2004.
The Auckland District Health Board chief executive, Graeme Edmond,
raised members' concerns in a letter to the ministry.
He said the board did not understand the rationale for investing so
much public money in the programme when health cash was so tight and
deficits so large.
"We are not convinced that the burden of this disease in the
population justifies the need to vaccinate all children and young people
under the age of 20 ... "
Mr Edmond asked why the programme was not targeted at those in
greatest danger - poor and Maori and Pacific Island young people.
The Director-General of Health, Karen Poutasi, replied that the money
was on top of all other Government health finance, so other programmes
were not financially affected.
A successful vaccination programme was likely to reduce the hospital
admission rate from the disease, which would help boards' finances.
The meningococcal epidemic has caused 4506 cases and 194 deaths since
it started in 1991. Up to a fifth of survivors are left with a
disability or brain damage.
The vaccination strategy is expected to prevent at least 4000 cases
and 200 deaths over 10 years.
"Meningococcal disease now causes more hospitalisations and more
fatalities than any other notifiable infectious disease in New Zealand,"
Dr Poutasi said.
She cited estimates showing the epidemic had cost the country $630
million, including direct costs to the health sector of $300 million.
"Mass vaccination offers the best prospect of controlling the
epidemic by raising the immunity of the most affected groups in the
population."
Targeting only those ethnic and economic groups at greatest risk
would not control the epidemic.
"The fewer people who are vaccinated, the lower the chance to
effectively control the epidemic."
There would also be "substantial equity issues to deal with" if a
more-targeted approach was used.
It would be hard to explain why people from one area should be
vaccinated and not those from another with a slightly lower rate of the
disease.
The Auckland board's chairman, Wayne Brown, pledged compliance with
the vaccination plan yesterday.
"We will do our best," he said.
Asked if the scheme was a wise use of public money, he said: "If the
Government is determined it's a good use of money, it's a good use of
money."
He said that on the basis of Dr Poutasi's letter, the scheme sounded
a good one, but she had failed to compare its cost-effectiveness with
other programmes.