Vaccination News Home Page            Scandals            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/5/e596

Full Text of this Article Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article Email this article to a friend P3Rs: Submit a response to this article Similar articles found in: Pediatrics Online PubMed PubMed Citation Search Medline for articles by: Wuhib, T. || McNabb, S. J.N. Alert me when: new articles cite this article   Download to Citation Manager

Collections under which this article appears: Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 5 May 2003, pp. e596-e600

 

Underestimation of Infant Mortality Rates in One Republic of the Former Soviet Union

Tadesse Wuhib, MD, MPH^*, Brian J. McCarthy, MD, MSc, Terence L. Chorba, MD, MPH, MPA, Tatiana A. Sinitsina, MD^||, Ivan V. Ivasiv, MD^¶ and Scott J.N. McNabb, PhD, MS^#

^* Epidemic Intelligence Service, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
World Health Organization Collaborating Center in Reproductive Health, Office of the Director, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Health Services Research and Evaluation Branch, Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
^|| Zhambyl Oblast, Republic of Kazakhstan
^¶ Maternal and Child Health, Kazakhstan Ministry of Health, Almaty, Kazakhstan
^# Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Objectives. Kazakhstan’s live-birth definition—that dates from the former Soviet Union (FSU) era—differs from that used by the World Health Organization (WHO). We studied the impacts of both live-birth definitions on the computations of the infant mortality rate (IMR) and maternal and child health (MCH) planning in Zhambyl Oblast, Kazakhstan.

Methods. We interviewed caregivers and abstracted medical records to obtain birth weight and age-at-death information on infant deaths in Zhambyl Oblast from November 1, 1996, through October 31, 1997. Using the 2 indicators of birth weight and age at death, we created a matrix delineating the respective contribution to infant death (maternal health, newborn care, or infant care) for the cells. We then calculated the IMR, birth weight-specific IMR (BWS-IMR), and birth weight-proportionate IMR (BWP-IMR) for each cell.

Results. The observed IMR in Zhambyl Oblast, in 1996—using the definition of a live birth from the FSU—was 32 per 1000 live births. The recalculated IMR—using the WHO definition—was 58.7 per 1000 live births. Computed estimates of the contribution to infant death, by the categories of maternal health, newborn care, and infant care, were 10%, 23%, and 67%, respectively, when using the live-birth definition from the Soviet era. These estimates shifted to 24%, 41%, and 35%, respectively, when using the WHO definition, yet only 8% of the Zhambyl Oblast MCH budget was earmarked to maternal health and newborn care, which we estimated accounted for 65% of infant deaths.

Conclusions. The live-birth definition commonly used in the FSU underestimated the IMR and undervalued the contributions to infant death by both maternal health and newborn care. We recommend that all republics of the FSU adopt the WHO live-birth definition so that the IMR can serve as a better indicator for MCH planning.

Key Words: infant mortality • former Soviet Union • perinatal • neonatal • maternal and child health

Abbreviations: IMR, infant mortality rate • WHO, World Health Organization • FSU, former Soviet Union • VLBW, very low birth weight • IBW, intermediate birth weight • NBW, normal birth weight • BWS, birth weight-specific • BWP, birth weight-proportionate

Received for publication Feb 20, 2002; accepted Dec 16, 2002.

Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. [Disclaimer]

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.