|
S.F. General balks on
vaccine ...bars staff from
smallpox shots due to
public safety |
|
In
one of the strongest challenges
anywhere to the Bush administration's
smallpox vaccination plan, San
Francisco General Hospital is
virtually barring staffers from
getting immunized because of concerns
about patient safety.
The move is part of a widening
revolt in medical circles against the
White House vaccine program.
Coincidentally, that program is led by
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention Director Dr. Julie
Gerberding, who ran the infection
control programs at San Francisco
General before joining the CDC in
1998.
Initially, federal planners
hoped to vaccinate 500,000 doctors and
nurses who would be the first line of
defense against a bioterrorism attack.
But because the vaccine itself
is an infectious agent -- a virus that
causes vaccinia, or cowpox -- it is
potentially dangerous to those
sensitive to that disease. There is
also a risk that newly immunized
health care workers,
for two to four weeks after
vaccination, can accidentally transmit
cowpox to patients.
Vaccinia typically stirs up a
strong antibody response that protects
against smallpox. But vaccinia can
sometimes cause a life-threatening,
runaway infection, particularly in
people with weakened immunity.
Dr. Susan Fernyak, director of
communicable disease prevention and
smallpox planning for the San
Francisco Department of Public Health,
said the purpose of the policy
restricting vaccinations is to protect
those patients.
"We didn't want anyone who is
vaccinated, and still infectious, to
be working with patients directly,"
she said. "We have a high number of
patients with HIV, with certain skin
conditions, with cancer, with
transplanted organs or who are taking
immunosuppressive agents."
Under the policy, city health
care workers who have "direct contact"
with patients are forbidden to receive
the vaccine unless they can find a way
to avoid patients. They must do so
until the blister from the vaccine on
their arm is no longer infectious --
at least two to four weeks.
NO TIME TO SPARE
But Fernyak acknowledged that, due to
the chronic shortage of nurses and
tight budgets, almost no one in the
hospital can be relieved from patient
care duty for that length of time.
Throughout the health
department, about 15 doctors and
administrators have juggled schedules
so they can be vaccinated, she said.
Nurses are unlikely to be able to do
the same.
Gerberding declined to comment
on San Francisco's smallpox vaccine
policy, but CDC spokesman Tom Skinner
said cities should not gloss over the
risk of bioterrorism. Gerberding, he
said, "has been participating in
meetings where a certain level of
intelligence has been shared, and
she's saying that, without a doubt,
we're doing the right thing."
Skinner said the reluctance of
many hospital workers to be vaccinated
could be shortsighted. "Here's the
problem: I don't think anyone knows
what an attack will look like," he
said. "Would it be one case in
Middletown, USA? Or a thousand cases
at different locations? Or a thousand
cases in one location? You must have
people in place to vaccinate people."
While most nurses at San
Francisco General appear to support
the city's stance -- and are firmly
backed by their union -- there are
some who want to be vaccinated.
"We're all health care
professionals. We can make decisions
for ourselves. You don't get to be an
ER nurse without having some brains,"
said one emergency department nurse,
who asked to remain anonymous.
RISK VERSUS BENEFITS
"There are two chances in a million of
dying from a vaccine," the nurse
added. "What are the chances of a
terrorist attack?"
A study by Rand, a Santa Monica
think tank, estimated that the
nation's 10 million health care
workers, who make up 3 percent of the
population, could account for as many
as half of the nation's smallpox cases
in the event of an attack.
But across the nation, only
about 7,354 civilians have been
vaccinated under the program to date.
Labor unions are actively urging their
members not to volunteer for the
vaccine.
Nurse union activists say the
overwhelming majority of nurses at San
Francisco General support the policy
-- in fact, the Service Employees
International Union Local 790 was
among the first to criticize the
vaccination plan.
"My feeling is, we don't ask the
health department, which is scarce on
resources, to pay for other people's
paranoia," said Lorraine Thiebaud,
vice president of Local 790. "If you
want to get the vaccine, and you've
got vacation time on the books, go out
and use it."
For every 1 million people
vaccinated, according to the CDC,
between 14 and 52 will experience a
severe reaction, and one or two will
die of it. Among that same group of
people, there will be 20 to 60 cases
of accidental transmission to someone
who comes in contact with them.
ACCIDENTAL INFECTION
Last week in Los Angeles, an
unidentified patient was hospitalized
with an accidental cowpox eye
infection, apparently contracted from
someone recently vaccinated in the
military.
Across the country, the issue of
compensating health care workers for
time lost if they are made ill by the
vaccine looms as the largest threat to
the federal program. CDC spokesman Tom
Skinner said the agency "is getting
closer and closer" to releasing a plan
to address those concerns.
But federal disease control
experts do not believe the vaccination
itself poses a significant threat to
immune-compromised patients. Last
week, the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices published
revised recommendations,
reiterating that proper
bandaging and other infection control
procedures should "essentially
eliminate" the risk of infecting a
patient.
With union hospital workers
reluctant to be vaccinated, medical
giant Kaiser Permanente has put on
hold its plans to give the vaccine to
its first- response staffers. Under a
"labor-management partnership" pact,
Kaiser is negotiating with its unions
over issues such as compensation for
lost time due to vaccine-related
illness.
"There are some details that
still need to be negotiated," said Dr.
David Witt, chairman of the infectious
disease program for Kaiser in Northern
California.
Witt said Kaiser doctors may be
more willing to be vaccinated than
unionized workers, because physicians
have "a better disability package than
the average union worker."
Nevertheless, he said some staffers at
his South San Francisco hospital are
eager to be vaccinated. "Some of them
are quite angry, but I told them we
can't go."
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/03/04/MN220873.DTL