Universal hepatitis B immunization of infants: reactions of
pediatricians and family physicians over time.
Freed GL, Bordley WC, Clark SJ, Konrad TR.
Division of Community Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
27599-7590.
OBJECTIVE. In November 1991 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice
(ACIP) recommended universal hepatitis B immunization of infants. In February
1992 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and in August 1992 the American
Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) issued similar recommendations. The purpose
of this study was to assess over time the effectiveness and impact of the
dissemination efforts of the ACIP, AAP, and AAFP regarding this new
recommendation and to determine the factors affecting its adoption. DESIGN.
Cohort survey over time. SETTING. North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS. All 778
pediatricians and a random sample of 300 family physicians in North Carolina
were surveyed by mail 3 months after publication of the ACIP recommendation
(January/February 1992), but before the AAP and AAFP recommendations. Response
rate was 78%. Of these, 83% responded to a follow-up survey 8 months later
(October 1992). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Rates of agreement and adoption of the
recommendation for universal infant immunization with hepatitis B vaccine;
factors affecting agreement and adoption of the recommendation. RESULTS.
In the first survey (3 months after the ACIP recommendation) more pediatricians
than family physicians were aware of the new recommendation (82% vs
48%), yet only 37% of pediatricians and 23% of family physicians agreed that
immunization of all newborns in their practice was warranted.Eight months later, after the AAP
and AAFP
recommendation, 66% of pediatricians and 32% of family physicians agreed
universal immunization was warranted, but still only 53% of pediatricians and
23% of family physicians had adopted it into practice. Factors associated
with these low rates of adoption include physician and practice characteristics,
cost, perceived need for the vaccine, and aversion to multiple injections.
CONCLUSIONS. Federal, AAP,
and AAFP
efforts have not been effective thus far in fostering widespread agreement and
adoption of this recommendation. If this and future vaccine programs are
to succeed, research is needed to determine influences on implementation of new
recommendations and to address the economic and noneconomic concerns of
physicians and parents.
Physician attitudes and practices regarding universal infant
vaccination against hepatitis B infection in Minnesota: implications for public
health policy.
Loewenson PR, White KE, Osterholm MT, MacDonald KL.
Acute Disease Epidemiology Section, Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis
55440-9441.
Physician attitudes and practices regarding universal infant vaccination against
hepatitis B virus infection in Minnesota were assessed approximately 1 year
after publication of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee
recommendations. Four-hundred eighteen Minnesota family physicians and
pediatricians were sent self-administered questionnaires, with follow-up by
telephone. Among physicians who provide care to infants, 67 (29%) of 234 family
physicians and 29 (50%) of 58 pediatricians routinely offered hepatitis B
vaccine to all infants (overall 33%) (P = 0.002). The recommendations of the
Immunization Practices Advisory Committee, the American Academy of Pediatrics
and the American Academy of Family Physicians had the greatest positive
influence on physicians' opinions regarding routine hepatitis B vaccination.
The
factors with the greatest negative influence on their opinions were the low
prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in Minnesota and the addition of three
injections to the current childhood immunization schedule. Universal infant
hepatitis B vaccination remains controversial among Minnesota family physicians
and pediatricians. We believe, given the variability in hepatitis B virus
incidence and prevalence in the United States and
the relatively low risk of
most infants, that a single national policy based solely on universal infant
immunization may be difficult to implement.
PMID: 8072819 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Why let the thorny problem of low risk prevent you from
vaccinating? - SM
Evaluation of universal hepatitis B immunization practices
of Illinois pediatricians.
Kraus DM, Campbell MM, Marcinak JF.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize universal hepatitis B immunization practices of
pediatricians who routinely provide childhood immunizations in Illinois.
DESIGN: Survey of 522 randomly chosen Illinois pediatricians. Student's t
test, chi 2 analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were used to
identify relationships between physician demographics and outcomes of
interest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician agreement with the new Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention Immunization Practices Advisory Committee and
the American Academy of Pediatrics universal infant hepatitis B immunization
guidelines, incorporation of the recommendations, routine hepatitis B
immunization of older children (aged 6 months to 11 years), and routine
hepatitis B immunization of adolescents. RESULTS: The survey response rate was
71.5%. Of those pediatricians routinely providing immunizations (N = 323),
72.8% agreed with and 90.1% have incorporated universal hepatitis B
immunization; 36.5% and 53.0% routinely immunized older children and
adolescents, respectively.
Pediatricians practicing in medium-sized practices were half as likely to
agree with the recommendations (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.84). Cost and
a belief that universal immunization of infants is not medically necessary
were the two most commonly listed reasons for not incorporating the new
guidelines. Percent reimbursement from public aid was negatively
related to the routine immunization of older children (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12
to 0.95). Both percent reimbursement from self-pay (OR, 5.62; 95% CI, 2.25 to
14.05) and a rural location (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.56) were related to
routine hepatitis B immunization of adolescents. Gender and number of years in
practice were not associated with physician response. CONCLUSIONS: The
majority of Illinois pediatricians who routinely provide pediatric
immunizations have incorporated the new universal hepatitis B immunization
guidelines into their practices. Continued efforts to address financial
barriers and to educate physicians may hasten the time when the transmission
of the hepatitis B virus will no longer occur.
Family physician acceptance of universal hepatitis B
immunization of infants.
Freed GL, Bordley WC, Clark SJ, Konrad TR.
Division of Community Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
27599-7490.
BACKGROUND. The incidence of hepatitis B infection has risen 37% over the last
decade; 300,000 new infections and 5000 deaths occur annually in the United
States. Because immunization programs that targeted high-risk groups failed to
abate this increase, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended in
November 1991 universal hepatitis B immunization of infants. Details were
published in an addendum to Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The purpose
of this study was to assess (1) the effectiveness of the CDC in disseminating
a new immunization recommendation to family physicians, (2) the effect of the
new recommendation on clinical practice, and (3) the degree to which
noneconomic barriers may affect adoption of universal hepatitis B
immunization. METHODS. A random sample of 300 family physicians in North
Carolina was surveyed by mail. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis
were used to assess the relationship of variables hypothesized to predict
physician awareness of, and agreement with, the new recommendation. RESULTS.
The response rate was 78%. Overall,
48% of family physicians who administered immunizations to children were aware
of the new hepatitis B vaccine recommendation. However, only 17% agreed that
it was warranted for all newborns in their practice. Twenty-five
percent expected more than one half of the parents to refuse three injections
at a single well-child visit, a result of adding this vaccine to the current
primary immunization schedule. Additionally, 42% expected nurses to resist
giving three injections at one visit. CONCLUSIONS. The CDC does not have an
effective mechanism for disseminating information to all physicians who care
for children. Improved coordination of recommendations between the CDC and
relevant specialty societies may help to increase physician adoption of new
immunization recommendations in their clinical practice. Additionally,
practical concerns of physicians and their patients regarding multiple
injections and other practice-relevant issues must be considered when
formulating new immunization recommendations, if their implementation is to be
successful. Additional research is needed to determine effective methods to
disseminate immunization information and to address practical concerns of
clinicians.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
Free Shipping Everyday - Visit babyearth.com today for innovative products and free shipping with minimum purchase.