Scandals: What Do We Really Know About Polio and the Polio Vaccine?/Pediatrics Peddling Vaccines
(Scroll down for article)
FREEDOM OF CHOICE IS NOT FREE
Vaccination News, A Non-Profit Corporation
All the News (includes Breaking News) - a running tab of everything posted on this website since October 29, 2003
Return to Vaccination News Home Page (for best results, right click to "open in new window")
View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Gottstein aka Mintz)
Subscribe to Scandals
Search This Site using keywords
click here to download Adobe Reader
What Do We Really
Know About Polio and the Polio Vaccine?
Neenyah Ostrom points out in her ChronicIllnet article published in Red Flags Weekly, “Will the Poliovirus Eradication Program Rid the World of Childhood Paralysis? - With So Little Poliovirus Detected Around the World, What Is Causing Today’s Outbreaks of Acute Flaccid Paralysis? ", that although the number of diagnosed cases of “polio” are at near-eradication levels, there continues to be “non-polio” paralysis around the globe. Called “acute flaccid paralysis”, its name bears a striking resemblance to the definition for paralytic polio (i.e., “asymmetrical flaccid paralysis”) in the textbook, Pediatric Infectious Diseases by Hugh Moffet.
What does this all mean in terms of the diagnoses of previous cases of “polio” and the alleged success of the “polio” vaccination program?
As I stated in my 1993 testimony to the Institute of Medicine,
‘In determining vaccine
effectiveness, the role of replacement disease, disease renaming and other
similar factors should be included. For
instance, the significance of an apparent rise in flaccid paralysis should be
determined, including whether or not it represents replacement disease, or
perhaps, instead, reflects a better understanding of the differences between
polio and flaccid paralysis. If polio
has merely been replaced by flaccid paralysis, rather than eliminated, the
success of the polio vaccine needs to be reevaluated. If polio has been renamed, it should be determined whether or not
many formerly classified cases should have instead been classified as flaccid
paralysis, thereby effecting our evaluation of the effectiveness of polio
vaccine in wiping out "polio".’
During a recent week, numerous articles were published touting a Pediatrics “study” allegedly proving infants can tolerate thousands of vaccines, have strong immune systems from birth, and denying any risk for the ever increasing vaccine load shouldered by them. (For another view, see January 23, 2002 testimony by Rick Rollens to the California State Senate.)
Why was there no explanation
about how the universal call for colostrum for newborns and breast
milk for
infants doesn’t jibe with their notion that infant immune systems are strong
from birth? Will there be a lessening
of emphasis on breast milk, rather than vaccines, if consistency is sought?
Sandy Mintz
past Scandals
Look for the next
Scandals
on Friday,
February 1, 2002.