http://www.healthheritageresearch.com/Polio-Conntact9606.html
|
By
Christopher J.
Rutty, Ph.D. Originally published in CONNTACTJune
1996 (Vol. 9 No. 3) © 2000 Christopher J. Rutty,
Ph.D. |
|
To
view the original full-size article, click on image. A key contribution to the Salk
vaccine was the "Toronto Method" of large-scale poliovirus
cultivation. It was developed in 1953 by Dr.
Leone N. Farrell, shown here with the prototype bottle rocking machine.
(Aventis Pasteur Limited Archives
Acc. 0438)
|
The complex problem of polio dominated the first half of the twentieth
century. While the grim terror of polio epidemics worsened, research
progress remained deadlocked. Hopes were raised in 1949 when a way was
finally discovered to grow the poliovirus in test tubes using non-nervous
tissues. This Nobel Prize winning advance by Enders of Boston greatly
stimulated polio researchers, including at Connaught
Medical Research Laboratories in the University of Toronto.
Connaught researchers made two key contributions that allowed the poliovirus
to be safely cultivated in enough quantities to enable the NFIP's
unprecedented trial of Salk's inactivated vaccine (IPV). Beginning in 1947, Dr.
Andrew J. Rhodes (1911-1995) led a comprehensive polio research program
at Connaught. With a research team that included long-time employees
Frank Shimada and Eina Clark, along with researchers at the Hospital for Sick
Children, Rhodes investigated the complex problems of polio's epidemiology
and diagnosis. This work was funded by Canadian Life Insurance
companies and Federal Public Health Research Grants, though more quietly by
the U.S. March of Dimes. By 1951, Rhodes was growing poliovirus in test tubes using Ender's
methods. Not enough virus was being produced to be practical for a
vaccine until a member of Rhodes' research team, Dr. Arthur E. Franklin,
tried a new synthetic nutrient base known as "Medium 199." It
was developed at Connaught between 1947 and 1949 by Dr. Joseph F. Morgan
(1918-1976) and Helen J. Morton under the supervision of Dr. Raymond C.
Parker (1903-1974), a leading international authority on tissue culture
techniques. Medium 199 was a chemically pure mixture of over 60
ingredients originally developed for studying cell nutrition in cancer
research. It was the first synthetic medium ever produced. In the fall of 1951, after discussing the problems of growing the
poliovirus using traditional methods, Morgan supplied Franklin with some
"199" to see if it could help. To Franklin's surprise
"199" worked incredibly well and was particularly effective for
cultivating the poliovirus in monkey kidney cells without additional animal
serums that would render any vaccine dangerous for human use. Meanwhile, Jonas Salk was confident that an inactivated vaccine could
prevent polio in humans as it seemed to in monkeys. However, it was not
yet safe for human trial, nor could he make enough for the millions who were
clamoring for protection from the dreaded crippler. Connaught solved
both problems. Medium 199 provided a chemically pure culture base,
which encouraged the NFIP to finance a major pilot project at Connaught to
cultivate the poliovirus in large quantities. In 1952-53, this effort
led to the "Toronto Method," developed by Dr. Leone N. Farrell
(1904-1986). It involved culturing the poliovirus in a solution of "199"
and monkey kidney cells using large Povitsky bottles incubated on a special
rocking machine (see photo). In 1952, Connaught's "199" gave Salk confidence to finally test
his vaccine on children. By July 1953, just as Canada's worst polio
epidemic began, the NFIP asked Connaught's Director, Dr. Robert D. Defries
(1889-1975), to provide all the poliovirus fluids required for a national
field trial of Salk's vaccine. Connaught had established a
prominent international reputation for making vaccines, and since it was a
non-commercial biologicals producer, an open relationship with Salk and the
NFIP was possible. Through the fall and winter of 1953-54, large
bottles full of each of the three poliovirus types were sent in station
wagons to Parke, Davis in Detroit and Eli Lilly in Indianapolis, for
inactivation and processing. In total Connaught produced some 3,000
litres of poliovirus fluids for the trial. After a number of delays, the mammoth experiment began on April 26, 1954,
involving some 1,800,000 children who were given the vaccine, or the harmless
"199" as a placebo, or were observed to see if they contracted
polio. In May, in appreciation of Connaught's work, the NFIP, through
Defries, offered the Canadian government a small amount of surplus vaccine to
take part in the trial. The lateness of the offer was not overly
appreciated in Ottawa, or most provinces, but the seriousness of the 1953
epidemic pressured Manitoba, Alberta and Halifax to accept it. For
Connaught and Ottawa, however, their sights were set on an all-Canadian trial
for the spring of 1955, no matter what the U.S. results were. In the
meantime, Connaught went ahead to prepare a finished vaccine, which included
the double testing of each lot by Connaught and Ottawa's Laboratory of
Hygiene. On April 12, 1955, the announcement of the trial results became an
international media event. After being immediately licensed by
Washington, American commercial producers rush-released the vaccine, but with
little government control. The Canadian trial was just starting, but
unlike in the U.S., the federal and provincial governments shared the full
cost of the vaccine and distributed it free to children. By the end of
April, however, the public euphoria over the vaccine was shattered when some
80 polio cases were directly associated with vaccine made by Cutter
Laboratories in California. This forced Cutter's vaccine off the
market, and then the cancellation of the entire vaccine program by the U.S.
Surgeon General. In Canada, the Minister of National Health and Welfare,
Paul Martin, faced his most difficult political decision: what should Canada
do? The Prime Minister was reluctant to let the Canadian trial to
continue, but based on Connaught's long experience with the vaccine, Martin
maintained his confidence. The vaccine had not yet caused any problems
in Canada and vaccinations continued without incident. This Canadian experience meant a great deal to Salk. It also
generated considerable media attention and debate in the U.S., especially
over the differing levels of government interest in the vaccine between the
two countries. The success of the Canadian program also played a major
role in ensuring the future international use of the IPV vaccine in the
control of polio. Subsequently, Connaught's pioneering work continued
with the development of DPT-Polio and related combined antigens in 1958-59,
the first trivalent Sabin oral polio vaccine between 1959 and 1962, and an
enhanced potency IPV vaccine in the mid 1970s prepared using continuous cell
lines. For further details on the Canadian polio story see my Ph.D. thesis: "'Do
Something!... Do Anything!' Poliomyelitis in Canada, 1927-1962." * As of December 1999, Connaught Laboratories Limited in Toronto
became known as Aventis Pasteur
Limited (Connaught Campus). Between 1914 and 1972 Connaught Medical Research Laboratories (as
it was known after 1946) was a self-supporting, non-commercial part of the University
of Toronto. It was sold by the U. of T. in 1972 to the Canadian
Development Corporation (CDC). In 1989 Connaught Laboratories Limited
(as it was known after 1972) was sold to Institut Mérieux of Lyon,
France, and soon became part of the global Pasteur Mérieux Connaught (PMC)
organization. PMC's parent company, Rhone Poulenc of France merged
with Hoechest of Germany in December 1999 to create Aventis,
the vaccine division of which (the former PMC) becoming known as Aventis
Pasteur. |
|
Christopher James Rutty, Ph.D. |
FOR SOME USEFUL HEALTH HERITAGE
RESOURCES VISIT...
Poliomyelitis
History:
Polio
in Canada | Featured
Resources | C.J.
Rutty's Polio Bibliography | Other
Resources
Medical History:
Canadian
| U.S.
| International
| Image
Resources | Virtual
Museums | Other
Links
General
Heritage:
Canadian
| U.S.
| International
| Archives
| Libraries
| Other
Links
Specialty
Areas:
Poliomyelitis
| Specific
Diseases | Public
Health | Health
Agencies | Vaccines
| Other
Links
Page prepared by
HEALTH HERITAGE
RESEARCH SERVICES
Last Updated: July 18, 2000
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.