"There are no secrets
that time does not reveal" - Jean Racine
What time and the legal
system are beginning to reveal about what vaccine manufacturers and the
Waters & Kraus, the lead law firm in a
consortium of law suits concerning thimerosal in vaccines and
consequent neurological damage resulting in autism, just released
most recent bombshell: Eli Lilly, as early as the 1930's, was
apparently aware of the harmful nature of thimerosal in vaccines.
In an earlier
release Waters & Kraus also revealed that the CDC withheld
critical evidence to the Institute of Medicine, instead supplying
inconclusive information which contributed to the IOM's (lack of) conclusions
regarding thimerosal in vaccines. These facts have only been
obtained as a result of the judicial discovery process and would not be
known now were it not for pending lawsuits.
In an earlier lawsuit,
private letters were obtained documenting significant contributions
made by vaccine manufacturers to the American Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP). This issue of conflict of interest between the AAP and
vaccine manufacturers would probably still be unknown were it not for a
The cigarette companies played dumb and blind
forced them to tell the truth. It would seem that the vaccine
manufacturers have much in common with the cigarette companies if they,
too, are not voluntarily revealing all they know. If so,
given the fact that vaccines, unlike cigarettes, are recommended, even
mandated - and because parents have been convinced of their
safety, they do not object to the recommendations and mandates
concerning their use - the situation is all that more deplorable.
What else do the vaccine manufacturers know?
When will the medical profession, and in
particular pediatricians, stop being complicit partners in this growing
familial and societal nightmare? When will doctors start
listening to the parents of vaccine-injured children and stop
patronizing them and dismissing their concerns? When will they
begin to honor the right of parents to determine what is best for their
children? When will they return to the precept of the
Hippocratic Oath to "first do no harm"?
Since they can no longer be sued by patients
for vaccine damage (only the government can go after doctors, and then
only if a government vaccine-damage award has been made on the basis of
medical negligence), why the resistance
to acknowledging and reporting
When will pediatricians begin to act as
advocates for all their patients, including the vaccine-injured and
those who choose not to vaccinate?
How much evidence do we, the public, need
before we begin to object to what is happening to our children?
When will we realize that until we stop automatically believing
everything we are told, we, too, are responsible for the wrongs being
done to our children?
When will we all begin to see how conflict of
interest compromises everything that is allegedly "known" about vaccine
When when will we begin to demand both our
rights and the truth?
Sandy Gottstein (aka Mintz)