Scandals
- 02/14/03
Avoidance Of Vaccine Truth
But Not Consequences - Are We "Knee Deep in the Big Muddy"? -
Pete
Seeger
by Sandy Mintz
Amid the glib reassurances, the unremitting claims that "the
benefits of vaccines (far) outweigh their risks", the CDC quietly
released some of the
results of
eleven years of vaccine adverse events reported to VAERS.
During the period covered, over 125,000 adverse reactions to
vaccination were reported.
Before anyone rushes to discount the import of these adverse
reaction reports, let it be noted that according to the CDC
report itself, "Overall, 14.2% of all reports received in VAERS during
1991-2001 described serious adverse events."
This translates to a good (or bad) 18,000 or so serious
adverse vaccine-associated reactions.
And what are we to make of these 18,000 or so serious adverse
reactions?
All we really know for sure is that a passive reporting system,
which is what VAERS is, receives notice of some fraction of serious
drug or vaccine associated events. And that
significant
underreporting is taking place.
Shouldn't we know more than that?
Clearly, it is of critical importance that we get a handle on
whether or not those 18,000 represent a large or small proportion of
actual serious events. It is also clear, however, that even if
there are no more than the 18,000 reported, that's a heck of a lot of
serious adverse reactions potentially caused by vaccines.
And while nobody knows how many of these vaccine-associated
reactions were, in fact, caused by vaccines, numbers like these are
nothing to sneeze at.
But will the "experts" sneeze or investigate? Will they react
with appropriate concern, choosing to thoroughly explore these
troubling facts, trying to determine the extent of vaccine
causality? Or will such associations, with a wave of their
omnipresent magic wand, be cavalierly dismissed as coincidental?
If history is any guide, their response will be along the lines of
the one the CDC already made
in the recent report, when they wrote, in referring to
vaccine-associated deaths, that the "IOM concluded that the majority of
deaths reported to VAERS are temporally but not causally related to
vaccination (20)."
But how could the Institute of Medicine know that? Didn't the
the IOM once
lament
that they were "handicapped" by the "many gaps and limitations in
knowledge bearing directly and indirectly on the safety of
vaccines"? Haven't other more recent IOM reports corroborated
that claim? How, then, could such a reassuring conclusion
justifiably be drawn?
Moreover, since virtually all studies compare vaccinated children to
vaccinated children, i.e., have no control group, no one really knows
what the incidence of these kinds of "events" are among never
vaccinated children. Thus, while the experts may like to claim
the results of such "studies" prove all vaccines to be equally safe,
the cold, hard fact is they may all be equally "unsafe".
The sad but unavoidable truth is that we don't know for sure how
many adverse reactions are occurring. Why don't we know
that? Shouldn't we know exactly how many children have been
harmed by vaccines? Shouldn't we know exactly how many once
healthy children are now either vaccine-injured or dead? Shouldn't we
know if it is hundreds or many thousands of children?
Shouldn't the fact that these vaccines are mandated amount to more
than a lame excuse for not facing the truth?
If it turns out that autism is related to vaccination, hiding our
heads in the sand will have done nothing to prevent the epidemic.
Ignoring an unpleasant reality will merely have served to prolong and
perpetuate it. The same can be said for the many other vaccine
reactions reported to VAERS.
Enough with the excuses. Isn't it time to conduct the kind of
studies which will bring us the knowledge we need?
How much death and disability will it take for us to take proper
note? How much death and disability will it take for us to
meaningfully care? Or will we stay "knee deep in the Big Muddy and the
damn fools keep yelling to push on"?
Sandy
Mintz
"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." - Wendell Phillips (1811-1884), paraphrasing
John Philpot Curran (1808)