UK researchers switch off genes that trigger cervical cancer
Susan Mayor, London
UK researchers have reported that they have been able to switch off a human
papillomavirus gene that triggers cervical cancer,using a new highly
targeted techniqueRNAinterference.
A team at the University of York reported last week that RNA interference,
which works by selectively "silencing" homologousgenes, completely
eliminated all human cervical cancer cells invitro yet left healthy
cells unharmed (Oncogene2002;21: 6041-8)[Medline].
This was the first evidence that RNA interference can turn off genes of
infectious viruses in tumour cells, rendering themharmless.
The researchers chose human cervical cancer cells that are positive for human
papillomavirus type 16 for the experimentalmodel because the type is
well understood and clinically important.Over 90% of human cervical
cancers test positive for papillomavirus,and abnormal cell
proliferation is driven by the effects of twoviral genesE6
andE7.
Professor Jo Milner, professor of cell biology at the University of York, and
coworker Dr Ming Jiang tested whether RNA interferencecould silence
E6 and E7 gene expression and restore normal cellfunctions. They
designed short interfering RNA (siRNA) for eachgene and used
liposomes to introduce it into thecells.
The siRNA targeted homologous messenger RNA (mRNA)the
intermediate messenger molecule that carries the code from DNA in cellnuclei to build proteins in the cell cytoplasmresulting
in itsdestruction. RNA interference degrades mRNA and so blocks theproduction of the protein it codesfor.
Professor Milner reported: "Silencing E6 completely eliminated E6 mRNA in
cervical cancer cells, but the cells continued togrow, although at a
slower rate. We then thought perhaps we mightneed to silence both E6
andE7."
Her research team tested siRNA for E7 alone to ensure that it worked. "To our
surprise, silencing E7 completely stopped cellproliferation and
caused massive apoptosis of the cells," shesaid. Apoptosis is the
process of cell suicide that enables controlledremoval of cells
without inducing an inflammatory response. Itis disrupted in many
cancers, resulting in uncontrolled cellgrowth.
Reassuringly, the study showed that siRNA for E7 had no effect on healthy
cells, showing its highly selective anticancereffect.
"For the first time, we have demonstrated that siRNA can induce selective
silencing of exogenous oncogenic viral genes inmammalian cells,"
Professor Milner explained. "Secondly, we haveshown that the process
of RNA interference does not interferewith the recovery of cellular
regulatory systems previously inhibitedby viral gene
expression."
She added: "The research indicated that E7 siRNA has major therapeutic
potential for the treatment, and possibly the prevention,of human
cervicalcancer."
The next step is to identify how E7 disrupts the normal apoptotic pathway.
Many cancers involve an imbalance between processesthat promote or
inhibit cell death, so the proof that RNA interferencecan silence
the genes leading to this loss of control could havewide
applications.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"