|
| About This Section |
 |
| BioMedNet Reviews |
Is the worlds largest life science reviews
database. It includes over 16,000 articles drawn from over 150 life
science and biomedical journals.
|

|
|
| Access To This Section |
As a BioMedNet member you have:
Free full-text access to this
article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days.
Access to abstracts of all articles
in the Reviews database.
You will have a full-text access to all other articles if your
institute subscribes.
Recommend to your librarian.
|
| |
| Did you know? |
Full-text access to BioMedNet Reviews is
available on subscription for your institute or company.
More information
|
| Email Alerts |
You can customize your email alerts from
BioMedNet Reviews to keep up to date with your own interests.
Sign up
here
|
|
|
 |

| |
Mapping bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain using
environmental data |
 |
 |
 |
| G.R. William Wint, Timothy P. Robinson, David
M. Bourn, Peter A. Durr, Simon I. Hay, Sarah E. Randolph and
David J. Rogers |
 |
|
Trends in Microbiology 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02444-7 |
 |
|
The
incidence of bovine tuberculosis (BTB) is increasing in Great
Britain, exacerbated by the temporary suspension of herd
testing in 2001 for fear of spreading the much more contagious
foot and mouth disease. The transmission pathways of BTB
remain poorly understood. Current hypotheses suggest the
disease is introduced into susceptible herds from a wildlife
reservoir (principally the Eurasian Badger) and/or from cattle
purchased from infected areas, while the role of climatic
factors in transmission has generally been ignored. Here, we
show how remotely sensed satellite data, which provide good
indicators of a variety of climatic factors, can be used to
describe the distribution of BTB in Great Britain in 1997, and
suggest how such data could be used to produce BTB risk maps
for the future.
|
Bovine tuberculosis (BTB),
which is caused by Mycobacterium bovis, was once
widespread in Great Britain, but is now focused in south-west
England, south-west Wales and parts of the Midlands (
Fig. 1). Scattered cases occur throughout the mainland and
outbreaks have been reported recently in mid-Wales. The
distribution of BTB is routinely monitored by the Department
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), although a
coherent management strategy has yet to be framed within a
descriptive model of disease transmission. The development of
such models is hampered by the fact that our knowledge of the
M. bovis transmission pathways is incomplete. The
biology of the host undoubtedly plays a major role in
transmission and although the effect of climate on the natural
history of the pathogen in the field is largely unknown, it is
likely to have a significant influence on the disease
[1]. Potential correlations between climatic factors and
the occurrence of BTB, which so far have not been investigated
extensively, can be obtained at a fairly fine spatial
resolution ( Box 1) from satellite
observations
[2,3] . Satellite data have already been used to describe
the distribution and abundance of several diseases in many
countries worldwide, including malaria
[4,5] , schistosomiasis
[6], trypanosomiasis
[79] , tick-borne diseases
[10], West Nile Virus in the USA
[11], the vectors of African horse sickness in South
Africa
[12] and blue tongue in the Mediterranean basin
[13]. Given these successes with vector-borne or
indirectly transmitted diseases, we assessed the use of the
same approach to describe the distribution of BTB in Great
Britain, as a potential complement to existing monitoring
procedures.
Data, images and image processing
BTB data were derived from the VETNET database for the
period 19881997. These are the geo-referenced BTB monitoring
data for the whole of mainland Great Britain, covering >80 000
holdings annually, and thus provide a reliable indication of
BTB distribution. Analyses were restricted to the presence or
absence of the disease within a herd as it proved impossible
to estimate incidence or prevalence reliably from the
database. Only data for 1997 were used, giving approximately
500 infected sites. Disease data are often spatially
clustered, which reduces the statistical significance of
distribution models. A subset of the data from the southern
Midlands was therefore examined for such spatial
autocorrelation, which appeared to be minimal beyond distances
of about 2 or 3 km. This suggested that autocorrelation in the
BTB data would be reduced by amalgamating the records into
spatial units of >3 km, so the data indicating the presence or
absence of BTB were aggregated into 5 km grid squares before
analysis. A broad range of anthropogenic, biological,
demographic, climatic and topographic variables was assessed
as predictors ( Box 1).
Data extraction and model construction
All predictor data were converted to 0.01 degree
resolution and stored in IDRISI (geographical analysis
software;
http://www.idrisi.clarku.edu) raster images in
latitude/longitude format. From each image, data values were
extracted for a series of data points corresponding to BTB-positive
and BTB-negative locations for 1997. After filtering to remove
any records with incomplete data, and then adjusting absence
sample sizes to give approximately equal numbers of
observations of positive and negative sites, the data were
subjected to step-wise forward logistic regression analysis
using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS;
http://www.spss.com) to establish the relationship between
the predictor variables and the presence or absence of
disease. Although this method partially compensates for
correlations between predictor variables, possible
co-linearity means that the precise order in which variables
are included in the model should be treated with some caution.
The output of logistic regression models, as widely used in
distribution studies
[14], is a prediction of the probability of presence for
each sample site. The threshold probability that most
accurately distinguishes presence from absence in logistic
regression tends to vary with the relative numbers of presence
and absence observations used; with equal sample sizes, a
threshold of 0.5 is likely to provide a reasonable balance
between minimising the prediction of false negatives and false
positives, and is thus appropriate for an exploratory model
such as this. The accuracy of the various logistic regression
models was assessed using the Kappa index of agreement
[15], which ranges from 0 (no predictive skill) to 1
(perfect prediction), with values >0.4 regarded as acceptable
and >0.75 as excellent
[16].
Once the best models had been determined, they were applied to
the full 1 km resolution imagery to produce output maps
predicting the probability of BTB presence throughout Great
Britain.
|
|
Go to the Full Article > > |
|
|
As
a BioMedNet member you have free
full-text access to this article
within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days
You
will have full-text access to all articles if your institute
subscribes.
Recommend a subscription to your librarian
There
are 15,000 more Review articles in
BioMedNet Reviews
Please
send us your
feedback on this magazine
|
|
|
|
BioMedNet Magazine
11th - 24th September 2002 |
|
 |
|
|
| Related
Links in BioMedNet Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|