Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7364/561/a

BMJ Intended for Health Professionals in the US with an interest in Smoking Cessation
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Dobson, R.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Other communication
Psychology
Patient - caregiver communication (including Patient education)
Patient - caregiver relationships
Patients' views

BMJ 2002;325:561 ( 14 September )

News

Doctors fail to see the joke

Roger Dobson, Abergavenny

A patient laughs four times during an average consultation with a doctor, according to new research.

But doctors rarely reciprocate, say the researchers, who videotaped 250 consultations in order to count the number of instances of laughter, smiles, and "smiling voices" involving the doctor or the patient or both.

The researchers, from the University of Helsinki, highlight some of the subjects of conversation that triggered laughter in the patients---varicose veins, pain in the leg, yeast infection, finger injury, and cholesterol testing---in a report of the study (Journal of Sociolinguistics 2002;6:207-35).

The report, "Laughter in medical interaction," shows that in 70% of cases of a patient's laughing there was no response from the doctor. In 20% of cases the doctor did smile, but in only 10% of cases did they laugh.

"The patients laugh more than the doctors. We see that the occurrence of laughter seldom leads to its reciprocation---laughing together. It is the patients who do most of the laughing in medical encounters," says the report.

It says that laughter is seen as an invitation to "come closer" and that there can be problems where it is not returned: "Not laughing with someone could indicate such negative features as mal-alignment and social distance."

The researchers cite various examples of the phenomena. One patient, aged 48, who was having his blood cholesterol level tested told the doctor that his father had died at a young age. The doctor asked him how old he had been and the patient replied: "Forty six. So I only have two more years." The doctor agreed and the patient laughed, but this elicited no response from the doctor. In another case, when a doctor was testing a patient's hearing, he whispered to the patient: "Can you hear this whisper?" The patient whispered back: "Yes" and laughed, also with no response.

Having looked at the evidence, the researchers suggest two theories for the failure of doctors to laugh along with their patients.

Firstly, the doctor's role can be characterised by attributes such as professional cautiousness and neutrality.

"Secondly, the patients mostly used laughter for different kinds of delicate tasks. In these consultations, there are more chances for delicate talks by the patients than the doctor---describing one's drinking, eating habits, undressing."



 


© BMJ 2002
 

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Dobson, R.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Other communication
Psychology
Patient - caregiver communication (including Patient education)
Patient - caregiver relationships
Patients' views


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ
 

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.