Breast-feeding children for more than a month can double their risk of
developing asthma or allergies, a 26-year study by researchers in Canada
and New Zealand suggests.
This contradicts the assumption breast-feeding protects infants against
both conditions and is expected to reignite the debate over whether
"breast is best."
Dr. Malcolm Sears, the lead researcher and a professor of medicine at
McMaster University in Hamilton, expects an onslaught of criticism after
the study is published in The Lancet, a British medical journal, tomorrow.
"There are many, many reasons why breast-feeding is good," he said in
an interview.
"All we're saying is that it doesn't protect against asthma and
allergies long-term, and in fact seems to increase the risk. If there are
100 reasons why it [breast-feeding] is good and one reason why it's bad,
then you go for the 100 reasons why it's good."
Dr. Sears and colleagues at the University of Otago in Dunedin, New
Zealand, tracked 1,037 children born in that city between April 1972 and
March 1973. Five hundred and four of the children (49 per cent) were
breast-fed for four weeks or longer, while 533 (51 per cent) were not. The
children were routinely assessed with respiratory questionnaires, measures
of breathing function and skin prick allergy tests.
The researchers found children who had been breast-fed were
significantly more likely to be allergic to cats, house dust mites and
grass pollen by age 21 than children who had not been breast-fed. The
breast-fed children were also more likely to report asthma at every
assessment. The researchers say their subjects' family history of hay
fever or asthma did not affect the results.
Dr. Sears was shocked by the results because they countered the
research team's expectations. He initially assumed someone had erred while
crunching the numbers.
What sets this study apart is its length: Most people's assumptions
about the link between asthma and breast milk are based on the results of
short-term studies, Dr. Sears said. Breast-feeding may indeed protect
against asthma and allergies, but that trend reverses itself over the long
term, he explained.
Breast milk contains antibodies that help infants fight bacteria,
viruses and parasites. A plethora of studies have linked breast-feeding
with higher child IQs and a reduced risk of ear infections, childhood
cancers and obesity, to name a few.
The World Health Organization last increased its recommended time for
exclusive breast-feeding from four months to six [with supplementary
breast-feeding continuing until at least the age of two].
But a growing body of evidence suggests breast-feeding can increase the
risk of certain conditions. British researchers recently linked
breast-feeding to early signs of coronary artery disease: They found
adults between 20 and 28 who had been breast-fed for more than four months
had stiffer arteries than peers who had been bottle-fed or nursed for a
shorter amount of time. A recent German study also suggested mother's milk
can contain concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, that are
so high they can hinder a baby's development.
Previous Canadian research has also suggested nursing mothers should
avoid peanuts if their family history suggests the child might develop an
allergy to them, because significant amounts of peanut protein can be
passed through breast milk.
Dr. Jack Newman, a leading Canadian breast-feeding advocate who
established the first hospital-based breast-feeding clinic in the country,
is skeptical of the new findings. Almost all newborn babies are fed at
least one or two bottles of supplementary formula before they leave the
hospital, which can skew the results of any study comparing breast-feeding
and formula-feeding, he said.
"Why does this study invalidate other studies that came before it? I
don't think it does," he said.
The researchers acknowledge most of the children probably received some
formula feeding in their first days of life, but stress that fact does not
affect their results.