"Ranking Risks of Gene-Altered Animals" (editorial, Sept. 4) says
that food safety risks are "no great problem" and that the risk of
allergic reactions may have "to be accepted if the nation wants
genetically improved foods."
Allergic reactions can be fatal. There is no need to accept any
increased risk of allergic reaction introduced into genetically
engineered foods.
The Food and Drug Administration could largely prevent such reactions
if it required genetically engineered foods to be tested and approved
before they go on the market, the way it does food additives.
There is even a protocol for the agency to follow: last year a panel
convened by the Word Health Organization and led by the National
Institutes of Health's top food allergy expert spelled out an
appropriate testing regimen. MICHAEL HANSEN
Yonkers, Sept. 5, 2002 The writer is a research associate, Consumers Union.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"