http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/issues/v155n9/abs/poa10028.html
|
|
|
See Related:
|
|
|
|
|
Objective To determine how the withdrawal
from the market of the rotavirus vaccine has affected physicians' trust in
vaccine safety mechanisms, future adherence to vaccine recommendations, and
willingness to use a new rotavirus vaccine. Design National survey mailed to 1228
randomly selected pediatricians and family physicians. Main Outcome
Measures Confidence in vaccine safety mechanisms was defined by agreement with
the statements that the system for determining vaccine safety before a
vaccine is licensed works well and that the system for monitoring vaccine
safety after vaccine licensure works well. Physicians who indicated that they
would use a new rotavirus vaccine within 1 year of licensure and
recommendation by professional organizations were classified as "early
adopters." Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship
between trust in vaccine safety mechanisms and future early adoption of new
rotavirus vaccines. Results Following the withdrawal of the
rotavirus vaccine, 83% of respondents believed the postlicensure surveillance
system works well to monitor vaccine safety, while 22% of respondents
believed the prelicensure system works well to determine vaccine safety.
After adjusting for physician specialty and years in practice, respondents
who believed the prelicensure vaccine safety system works well were
significantly more likely to be early adopters than those with less
confidence in prelicensure studies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.2 [95% confidence
interval, 1.3-3.6]). Conclusions Physicians have different levels
of trust in prelicensure studies that determine vaccine safety and
postlicensure surveillance systems that monitor vaccine safety. Trust in
prelicensure vaccine safety evaluations may be associated with early
adherence to new vaccine recommendations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
Med. 2001;155:1051-1056 View
Full Text Accepted for publication
April 10, 2001. This study was funded by
the Ambulatory Pediatric Association's Special Project Grant for
Immunization-Related Research, McLean, Va (Drs McPhillips, Davis, and
Taylor).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.