Aborted Children By Yvonne Bontkowski
Published 10. 3. 02 at 20:40 Sierra Time
Aside from the
issue of dangers of vaccination, which many vaccination groups and parents
have addressed. A growing number of pro-life people are also taking a stand
against vaccinations derived from deliberately aborted children. Yes, you
heard right, vaccines from aborted children.
For over 30 years the pharmaceutical companies in this country have been
producing vaccines derived from tissues of aborted fetuses, a fact that was
brought to light only in the late 1990's. When the source of the vaccines
were revealed, many principled individuals objected and with good reason. As
the information has continued to become more and more public, a large number
of physicians and parents are highly troubled by the ethical issues
During the Rubella Epidemic of 1964, some doctors advised exposed pregnant
women to abort their children. The resulting virus strain developed was
known in the science world as RA/27/3. Where R=Rubella A=Abortus 27=27th
fetus tested 3=3rd Tissue explant. There were 26 abortions prior to finding
the "right" species with the active virus. (This was absolutely unnecessary
as the Japanese proved by swabbing the throat of an infected child in order
to obtain the virus.) The vaccine was then cultivated on the lung tissue of
yet another aborted infant WI-38. WI-38 (Wistar Institute 38) was taken from
the lung tissue of an aborted female infant at 3 months gestation in the
1960's. a second human cell line, MRC-5 was derived from a male at 14 weeks
gestation in the 1970's. They were used to cultivate the weakened virus
strains of several diseases to produce immunizations. These two human cell
lines cultivated in the lab continue to provide an ongoing source for many
widely used childhood vaccines.
Because the pharmaceutical industry has perceived a public acceptance of the
current vaccines, they are continuing to utilize both the existing aborted
fetal cell lines- and fresh sources- in order to create new vaccines. After
the Sept. 11th attacks, the federal government sought out contracts to
develop a new smallpox vaccine. Despite the fact that the FDA and CDC had
acknowledged several cell substrates would be acceptable for growing the
virus, when the award was granted to Acambis Inc., they opted to use the
MRC-5 aborted fetal cell line. After thousands of angry protests flooded our
government offices, 30 days later a second contract was awarded to Acambis/Baxter,
but this time, aborted fetal tissue would not be utilized.
More disturbing is the pharmaceutical industry's latest trend to begin using
a new fetal cell line named PER C6, created by Dutch pharmaceutical, Crucell,
NV. This cell line was taken from the retinal tissue of an 18 week gestation
baby, aborted because, according to Dr. Van Der Eb at recent FDA hearings,
"the father was unknown and the woman wanted to get rid of the fetus". Dr.
Van Der Eb went on to say, "PER C6 was made just for the pharmaceutical
manufacturing of adenovirus vectors." He added, "I realize that this sounds
a bit commercial, but PER C6 were made for that particular purpose."
The most important fact is that vaccines can and must be made from other
sources other than tissues from aborted fetuses. While the safety issue is
important to all parents and physicians, the use of aborted fetal tissue is
important to the pro-life movement and those parents who rightly refuse
these vaccinations based on moral conscience. Parents are being denied
exemptions across this country because of mandates. It is time the parents
earn back the "right to chose" what is best for their children, whether it
be on moral grounds or from the safety issues that surround these vaccines.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.
Copyright 2013 by Vaccination News, A Non-Profit Corporation. All Rights Reserved. This content may not be copied unless permission in writing from Sandy Gottstein has been obtained.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"