U.S. Troops Were Subjected to a Wider Toxic Testing
October 9, 2002
By THOM SHANKER
WASHINGTON, Oct. 8 - Acknowledging a much wider testing of toxic weapons on
its forces, the Defense Department says it used chemical warfare and live
biological agents during cold-war-era military exercises on American soil, as
well as in Canada and Britain, according to previously secret documents cleared
for release to Congress on Wednesday.
Sixteen of the newly declassified reports, prepared by the Pentagon, describe
how chemical and biological exercises, until now undisclosed, used deadly
substances like VX and sarin to test the vulnerability of American forces to
unconventional attack. An additional dozen reports describe how more benign
substances were used to mimic the spread of the poisons in other tests.
The reports, which detail tests conducted from 1962 to
1971, reveal for the first time that the chemical warfare agents were used
during exercises on American soil, in Alaska, Hawaii and Maryland, and that a
mild biological agent was used in Florida.
Pentagon officials said late today that their
investigations indicated that none of the lethal chemical agents had
dispersed into the general population. Some milder substances did escape into
the atmosphere, with a plant fungus dispersing in an area of Florida, a
naturally occurring bacteria in Hawaii and a mild chemical irritant in a remote
part of Alaska.
Late today, Dr. William Winkenwerder Jr., assistant
secretary of defense for health affairs, said military personnel in the tests
had been given protection available at the time, though he conceded that it was
primitive compared with what is available today.
In May, the Pentagon disclosed that ships and sailors had
been sprayed with chemical and biological agents during cold-war-era testing.
Unlike the newly disclosed tests, however, those took place on the high seas
rather than on American soil.
The Defense Department is working with the Department of Veterans Affairs to
identify an estimated 5,500 people believed to have participated in the land and
sea tests, because it remains unclear, even today, whether all the military
personnel were fully aware of the nature of the exercises, and the potential
risks.
"We are taking this action now," Dr. Winkenwerder said, "because we do care
about veterans and we do care about service members and their health and any
potential ill health effects that might have resulted from their service to
their country."
Congress has scheduled hearings this week to examine the documents and the
government's responsibility to any veterans suffering from ill effects. The
House Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Health meets in closed session on
Wednesday to be briefed on the reports, and the Senate Armed Services
Subcommittee on Personnel meets on Thursday.
Representative Christopher H. Smith, the New Jersey
Republican who is chairman of the House committee, demanded today that the
government make assistance available to any veteran made ill by the tests,
especially as the Bush administration argues that military action may be
required to disarm Iraq's arsenal of unconventional weapons.
"At a time when our nation may be called upon to fight a
war to protect Americans from chemical and biological terrorism," Mr. Smith
said, "it is tragic to learn that four decades earlier, some of America's
soldiers and sailors were unwitting participants in tests using live chemical
and biological toxins."
The purpose of the tests was not to study chemical and biological weapons'
effects on human health. Rather, the aim of the tests on land was to learn more
about how chemical and biological weapons would be affected by climate,
environment and other combat conditions. Tests at sea were intended to gauge the
vulnerability of warships and how they might respond to the attack while
continuing to fight.
The Pentagon previously released details of 10 tests that
were conducted in the Pacific during the 1960's, but the
new documents describe a program that was much larger and
not restricted to tests at sea.
Tests conducted together with the Canadian government used
VX, and tests with Britain used sarin and VX, the documents show.
Officials say that military and medical investigators are studying reports on
35 additional tests that might have been conducted with live chemical or
biological agents during this same period, but whose results remain classified.
The investigation is slow because the records are on paper, stored at Fort
Douglas, Utah.
The legacy of the tests puts the Pentagon in a difficult position, trying to
balance the legitimate health concerns of veterans - and anger at the lack of
information on possible exposure - against the record of both Democratic and
Republican administrations struggling to defend the nation against the threat of
chemical or biological attack.
"It is easy to look in hindsight and to conclude that
things could have been done in a different or better way,"
Dr. Winkenwerder said.
"But it's important to understand the context and the time period," he added.
"We were involved in a cold war with the Soviet Union and had great concerns
about what they might do. I think history has proven that those were not false
concerns in terms of the offensive program that was being developed and might
have been well in place at that time."
The process of identifying affected veterans began in
September 2000 under pressure from Representative Mike Thompson, a California
Democrat, who was responding to claims by veterans that they had suffered health
damage from the tests.
"The Department of Defense has not only subjected our own soldiers to
dangerous substances, it may have put civilians it is charged with protecting at
risk," Mr. Thompson said tonight. "It is appalling that 40 years have passed and
this information is just now being disclosed."
=============================================
News@909shot.com is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center
and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines,
diseases and how to protect your informed
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"