Wednesday, October 02,
2002 - 12:00 a.m. Pacific
"USDA organic"
label moves industry into mainstream
By
Jake Batsell
Seattle Times business reporter
After years of confusion about what it means when food is labeled
organic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is about to roll out a new seal
designed to bring clarity to a fast-growing industry.
Beginning Oct. 21, foods certified as at least 95 percent organic that
is, produced without most pesticides, toxic fertilizers, growth hormones and
antibiotics can carry an official "USDA organic" seal.
Organic grocers, farmers and shoppers around the Puget Sound area say the
federal government's stamp of approval is another step toward mainstream
acceptance for the industry. Organic food sales are growing by about 20
percent a year and are expected to surpass $11 billion this year in the
United States.
Still, the seal may not have much of an immediate impact on sales in
Washington state, which has had its own certification program for 14 years.
And since the new rules apply only to food produced on or after Oct. 21,
it may be several months before the seal becomes commonplace in grocery
aisles, particularly in the case of packaged foods.
"The market is coming our way, and this will help move it along a little
faster," said Trudy Bialic, spokeswoman for PCC Natural Markets. "But I
don't think consumers should expect to see a dramatic change on the shelves
overnight."
The national standards replace what had been a mishmash of certification
systems run by individual states and private groups. The seal will act as a
safeguard against creatively worded packages that identify a product as
organic when only a few ingredients are.
Under the new rules, a product can bear the USDA organic seal if at least
95 percent of its ingredients are certified organic. Foods that are 70 to 95
percent organic can't carry the seal but can be billed on the front of the
package as "made with organic ingredients." Products less than 70 percent
organic can list certified ingredients on the side label.
Tina Roberts, director of sales and marketing for Larry's Markets, said
the new rules will help because under the current system, "some consumers
feel cheated for not feeling they can make an educated decision. This will
help them make that educated decision."
Fine of
violation


Selling or labeling products "organic" when they are not could
result in a $10,000 fine for each violation.
Projected annual U.S. sales of organic foods: $11 billion in
2002; $20 billion in 2005.
Washington state has 560 certified organic farmers this year,
up from 297 in 1997.
For more detailed information on the USDA organic standards,
visit our Web site at
www.ams.usda.gov/nop, call the National Organic Program at
202-720-3252, or write USDA-AMS-TM-NOP, Room 4008 S. Building,
Ag Stop 0268, 1400 and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
20250. |
|

|
The USDA's standards are similar to those already required by the state's
Organic Food Program, which was created in 1988. Miles McEvoy, manager of
Washington's organic program, said it will probably take about a year for
all labels to reflect the new national criteria.
While most in the industry seem to welcome the idea of a national
standard, saying it will give organic food more credibility, the new rules
have irked some smaller growers. Some small-scale farmers say lowering the
bar to 95 percent for the "USDA Organic" seal will encourage bigger farms to
aspire to only the bare minimum.
The USDA system also calls for more extensive documentation, which some
smaller growers say is cumbersome. And new rules about how and when compost
can be used for organic produce have forced some small farmers to alter the
timing of their harvests.
"It really kind of changed our growing habits, and that's putting more
pressure on the small grower," said Andrew Stout, co-owner of the Full
Circle Farm in Carnation, an 80-acre operation that grows fruits, vegetables
and herbs.
Consumers, meanwhile, still harbor reservations about organic foods that
go beyond the way they are labeled. Organic products are generally pricier
than standard fare, and no research has shown that they are demonstrably
healthier than conventionally grown foods.
"I think for a lot of people who don't buy organic, it isn't because of
the labeling it's because of the price or because they think it doesn't
make much of a (health) difference," organic shopper Kristin Storey of
Phinney Ridge said last week at the Green Lake PCC store.
Storey said the new label won't have much of an impact on her shopping
habits "if it's got an organic label on it, I trust that it's gone through
some procedure or another," she said.
Still, Storey is glad the federal government is paying attention to
organic food.
"I feel good that the United States as a whole is taking some action,
finally," she said.
Jake Batsell: 206-464-2718 or
jbatsell@seattletimes.com.
Copyright © 2002 The Seattle Times Company
More business & technology headlines