The Specter of a New and Deadlier Smallpox
By RICHARD PRESTON
RINCETON,
N.J.
Smallpox, or variola virus, is considered by many doctors to be the pathogen
most dangerous to the human species. The virus was eradicated as a natural
disease 25 years ago, and is now stored legally at only two sites: in a freezer
at the Atlanta headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and at a Russian government laboratory in Siberia. Research on the virus is
being conducted at both sites, but is tightly restricted by the World Health
Organization. In 1972, the United States stopped giving routine vaccinations for
the virus.
Now fears about smallpox have returned, with the possibility that this
biological agent will be used as a weapon in terrorism or war. A number of
countries, including Iraq, Iran and North Korea, are suspected by United States
intelligence agencies of keeping clandestine stocks of smallpox for use as a
weapon.
The United States government has begun a crash effort to create a national
stockpile of vaccine for use in a smallpox emergency, at a cost of around $1
billion. Though the vaccine is being made with modern methods, it is designed to
work against the natural form of the smallpox virus. This vaccine was developed
in 1796. Would it work against a 21st-century biologically engineered smallpox?
Probably not. And given rapid advances in molecular biology, genetic engineering
of the smallpox virus is now feasible, not by amateurs or terrorist groups but
by professional scientists in countries that have biowarfare programs.
In early 2001, a group of researchers in Australia surprised and scared pox
virus experts when they reported that they'd put the interleukin-4 gene, the
gene that controls immune responses, into the mousepox virus and found that it
made mousepox into a killer virus in naturally immune mice and deadly even to
some vaccinated mice. (Mousepox is related to smallpox but can't infect people.)
If this particular gene made mousepox vaccine-resistant, then there is the
frightening possibility that the gene could be added to the smallpox virus,
making it vaccine-resistant a super variola. The interleukin-4 gene is one of
the most commonly studied genes. Thousands of scientific papers have been
written about it and it can be readily purchased on the Internet by scientists.
(The gene typically comes as a pinch of dried bacteria in a small brown glass
bottle.)
Few people realize how straightforward it is to put a gene into a virus.
Genetic engineering of viruses, for peaceful research, has become routine and
standardized. The cost of supplies for creating a strain of engineered virus for
an experiment can be less than $1,000, and it can be done on a laboratory
countertop that's three feet long.
Pox viruses are among the easiest viruses to engineer in the lab because they
readily accept foreign genes. The first engineering of a pox virus was done more
than 20 years ago. There is little doubt that Iraqi biologists know how to do
it. Smallpox could probably be genetically engineered in a couple of rooms in a
small facility with relatively simple safety precautions, and it might be very
hard for inspectors to find it or prove what was going on. A nation that has
clandestine stocks of smallpox might thereby be able to make a strain that would
do an end run around the American stockpile of the vaccine, with severe
consequences.
Recently Mark Buller, a pox virus researcher at the St. Louis University
School of Medicine, began experiments with mousepox to try to answer the
question of whether, in fact, the interleukin-4 gene really would turn natural
smallpox into a superpox. His team is trying to develop a vaccine strategy that
could work against such a virus. That research is ongoing and will take time.
The biologist community has reacted with troubled anxiety to the idea of
genetically engineered bioweapons. The Australian scientists who worked on the
mousepox virus wanted to alert scientists about how easy it might be to engineer
a supervirus. Even so, many scientists prefer not to talk about how such
research might be used, while others believe that no nation is likely to make a
super smallpox because such a weapon would be uncontrollable and devastating for
the world. Perhaps.
This logic of restraint, however, did not persuade Edward Teller and Andrei
Sakharov, the distinguished American and Russian physicists who independently
invented the hydrogen bomb, to stop their research. They sincerely believed it
was the right thing for their countries, and they were attracted to the
technical challenge. When something can be done in science, in the end it is
almost always done.
Weapons are often simpler to make than peaceful technologies: a cannon is
less complicated than a clock; a nuclear bomb is a simpler device than a nuclear
power plant. Biologists are now in much the same position as physicists were
during the late 1930's, when it was becoming apparent to some of them that,
whether they liked it or not, they were learning that the forces of nature could
be directed into a giant bomb and that someone could really try to make it.
The question now is whether scientists and policymakers can fully recognize that
recent advances in molecular biology are making possible the creation of
frightening new weapons and whether they will be prepared to offer protection
to ordinary citizens if or when such weapons become a reality.
Richard Preston is the author, most recently, of The Demon in the
Freezer: A True Story.