Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,808777,00.html

Guardian Unlimited
 
Login

Go to:  

Guardian UnlimitedThe Guardian
Home   UK   Business   Net   News in pictures   The wrap   Weblog   Talk   Search  
The Guardian   World   News guide   Arts   Special reports   Columnists   Audio   Help   Quiz  


 

  UK news
 
  Search this site









  In this section
Ferguson accused of indecent assault

Carlton and Granada in £2.5bn merger to halt ratings slump

Putin demands proof over Iraqi weapons

Irish keep Europe guessing on enlargement

British wine growers drink to vintage year

Britain accepts recycling deal

Parents of death threat boys may go to court

'Heretic' primate faces backlash

England fans shot after football riot

Police investigate hate mail against lottery fund

Spicing up the campaign

2002 likely to be the best of the bunch

Shake-up for A-level maths after failures

PFI is poor value, say accountants

Exclusion panels wield power over schools

'I don't condone the calls'

200 passengers evacuated in Channel Tunnel fire scare

Glaxo 'played down Seroxat side effects'

Country houses give up treasures

Madonna and Ritchie film is swept away by tide of vitriol

Trimble warns against bigger role for Dublin

Green groups fight road threat to hills

Tramp's embalmed body leaves problem for coroner

Israel lobby calls in US advisers to boost image

UK news in brief

Former Arsenal star tells of new direction at Guardian awards


 

  Smallpox vaccine 'not for the public'

Sarah Boseley, health editor
Thursday October 10, 2002
The Guardian


Smallpox vaccination against possible terrorist attack will be offered only to health workers and other key personnel, the government said yesterday, partly because of the inherent dangers of the vaccine. When it was in routine use, the vaccine killed one person in every million.

But limiting the vaccine's use to outbreaks of the deadly disease was heavily criticised by the Labour chairman of the House of Commons select committee on science and technology, who said it could cause widespread panic.

"I don't think we can assume that it is only necessarily going to be the health workers who are subjected to the attack," said Ian Gibson. "People will say - why not me as well? You could set off fear and panic by protecting just one sector of the population.

"The only sensible way to alleviate people's fear - because they will be frightened - is to vaccinate everybody."

He also questioned the timing of the revelation, by the chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, that contingency plans were being made to vaccinate. "Why now?" asked Dr Gibson. "It is just building up this Iraqi scare that Madam Death is waiting in the wings. Terrorism is always on the agenda, from the Tokyo underground days. Why now? is the question, and I shall be asking it in the House of Commons."

Britain is following in the footsteps of the United States, where there has been enormous pressure on the government to vaccinate the entire population. Two weeks ago, the Centres for Disease Control announced detailed plans for inoculating 288 million Americans against smallpox, within days of an attack. It has said that pre-event inoculation is still under consideration, but there are no plans yet to protect anyone except key medical and emergency personnel before an outbreak of the disease.

The UK government says its position is similar. "If we have an attack, we need some people to be immune. Therefore we need to vaccinate some people in advance. We're considering who that might be and how many of those people there might be," a Department of Health spokesman said.

The position of Sir Liam is that the vaccination of health workers has to go ahead. "It is when rather than whether," he has said.

The policy in the event of an attack is to "ring fence" the outbreak, by rushing in stocks of vaccine and immunising all contacts of those people who have shown signs of the disease.

The side effects of the vaccination, which include fatal reactions, tip the balance against universal immunisation unless there is a confirmed attack. John Oxford, professor of virology at the London hospital medical college, said one in a million people used to die during the mass vaccination campaign which lasted from around 1948 to 1971.

"Immunising 50 million, you might get 50 deaths, mainly in children with eczema or these days people with HIV," he said. "In those days, when you could have died of smallpox, you took the risk."

But towards the end of the mass campaign which eradicated the disease a new vaccine was being developed which was tested on 10,000 people and appeared to be milder and safer. Today's vaccines are based on that model. "It looked very good," said Prof Oxford. It looked safe. There were many fewer side effects than with the conventional stuff. But it was not tried on a million people."

Related articles
17.06.2002: Check on food ads for children
17.06.2002: MMR row resurfaces
12.06.2002: Call for urgent action to combat diabetes spread
09.06.2002: Focus: STD figures soar
30.05.2002: Profile: Tamed tigress with healthy record
24.05.2002: Living in south adds years to healthy living as northerners die younger
20.05.2002: Free swim scheme for under-18s hailed in quest for healthier Britain
12.04.2002: Nicotine drug could be free on NHS
17.03.2002: Abortions rise in under-age sex crisis
08.03.2002: A healthy challenge to the media
08.03.2002: Councils 'best placed to tackle health deprivation'
09.11.2001: Comment: Lines on the map could improve public health

Big issue
Public health

Useful sites
Department of Health
Health Development Agency
UK Public Health Association



 


Printable version | Send it to a friend | Read it later | See saved stories

 

 



UP

 
 

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.