Vaccination News Home Page

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7368/791/a

BMJ Click for more Info
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Other related articles in BMJ
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Hargreaves, S.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Genetics
Haematology Incl Blood Transfusion

BMJ 2002;325:791 ( 12 October )

News

Rules on gene therapy are tightened after leukaemia alert

Sally Hargreaves, London

The UK Department of Health's gene therapy advisory committee (GTAC) has this week recommended that additional measures be put in place to protect patients undergoing gene therapy trials.

This comes in response to the suspension of gene therapy trials at Necker Hospital, Paris, when a boy being treated for X linked severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome (SCID) developed leukaemia.

The committee was alerted to the case on 16 September and has subsequently carried out a review of ongoing gene therapy trials in the United Kingdom. Only two studies, both involving the treatment of children at the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, were identified as being closely related to the French study.

"GTAC considers this a most serious case," said Professor Norman Nevin, the committee's chairman. "Yet in balancing the potential risks and benefits to these children, and in weighing up alternative treatment options, we have decided that, at this time, it would be unjustifiable to withdraw GTAC's approval of the two Great Ormond Street studies."

Gene therapy for patients with X linked SCID, in which the patient's bone marrow cells are deliberately infected with a retrovirus modified to carry the corrective gene for a functioning immune system, was successfully used to treat an 18 month old boy, Rhys Evans, at Great Ormond Street earlier this year (13 April, p 872).

Professor Adrian Thrasher, consultant immunologist at Great Ormond Street, who was involved in the successful treatment of Rhys Evans, thought the risk of other patients' developing leukaemia was very low.

He told the BMJ: "Our studies are very similar [to the French study] and use similar viruses. The problem in France has arisen because the transgene was inserted close to an oncogene and has activated it... However, it is almost certain that the leukaemia would have needed additional triggers, for example genetic predisposition and viral infection, but these are much harder to determine."

According to Professor Thrasher, in the thousands of animal studies that have used this type of technology a mutation of this kind has been documented only once.

 


© BMJ 2002
 

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Other related articles in BMJ
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Hargreaves, S.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Genetics
Haematology Incl Blood Transfusion

Other related articles in BMJ:

EDITOR'S CHOICE
Genes and ethics.
BMJ 2002 325: 0. [Full text]  

 


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Intended for Health professionals - Click here for further information
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.