LONDON (Reuters Health) - The
Pneumovax II vaccine, routinely given to those at high risk of pneumococcal
infections, may only have a protective effect of around 30% against a specific
type of infection in high-risk people, according to the results of a small
study.
Dr. Zhiming Huo and colleagues from
St. George's Hospital Medical School in London analyzed 16 adults immunized with
the vaccine, and concluded it only resulted in adequate protection in five of
them.
The results, published in the October issue of Vaccine, follow earlier
studies that also raised questions about the vaccine's effectiveness.
"The protective effect of Pneumovax II vaccination on specific antigens in
high-risk individuals in vivo will at maximum only be around 30%," they write.
Pneumovax II (Aventis Pasteur MSD) is used in high-risk patients in whom
pneumococcal infections could be life threatening. These include the elderly,
those who have had their spleen removed or suffer from diabetes, and patients
with chronic diseases of the heart, kidneys, lungs or liver.
After previous research raised doubts about its effectiveness, the St.
George's Hospital Medical School team tested the vaccine in the lab to see how
effective it was in bolstering immunity.
The researchers reasoned that if the vaccine was to be effective it needed to
at least double concentrations of specific antibodies to pneumococcal infection.
But it also needed to increase serum opsonic capacity--a measure of capacity to
enhance phagocytosis of the pneumococcal bacteria. In phagocytosis, immune
system cells "swallow" the infectious agent.
The team recruited the 16 male and female patients and measured their level
of natural immunity acquired from exposure to infection in the past.
They then measured immune response to the pneumococcal S14 antigen, which is
one of the components of the Pneumovax II vaccine.
The results showed that only six out of the 16 volunteers experienced an
increase of 100% or more in antibodies to S14. Separate tests revealed only five
of them also had an increase in opsonic capacity.
Huo and colleagues acknowledged the study was small but added: "The results
add useful laboratory information to the controversial effect of Pneumovax II
vaccination in high-risk individuals."
Dr. Jonathan Van-Tam, medical director of Aventis Pasteur MSD, told Reuters
Health the findings had to be considered in the context of much bigger
epidemiological studies that showed it was effective in preventing infection.
"This was a small study and looked at the activity of one strain which is
known to show resistance. The whole point about the vaccine is that it's
formulated with 23 different serotypes and covers 90% of the organisms likely to
be involved."
"Other studies have shown the vaccine is about 65% effective."'
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"