A 20-year study has revealed that mastectomies are often unnecessary for
women with breast cancer.
Researchers found that carrying out a lumpectomy - removing just the
diseased tissue - could save as many lives as a total breast removal in
women with small tumours.
The results confirm data from the 1970s and 1980s which showed that
mastectomies were often unnecessary.
But some doctors had predicted that the less radical treatment would,
over the long term cause more deaths.
Radical
This was why at least 29% of women who were eligible for the less
radical treatments were not told about them by their doctors.
Over 50,000 breast cancer operations were performed in England in
2000-2001 and 15,000 of theses involved mastectomies.

It is time to declare the case against breast-conserving therapy
closed and focus our efforts on new strategies for the prevention
and cure of breast cancer

|
|
Dr Monica Morrow
|
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, was
carried out by the University of Pittsburgh and Italy's European Institute
of Oncology and studied more than 2,500 women.
Dr Monica Morrow, a breast cancer specialist said the findings had been
quite conclusive and should convince " even the most determined sceptics
that mastectomy is not superior to breast conservation."
In an editorial Dr Morrow said doctors must now focus on a cure for
breast cancer.
Survival
"It is time to declare the case against breast-conserving therapy
closed and focus our efforts on new strategies for the prevention and cure
of breast cancer."
Both studies showed that whether they had a lumpectomy or mastectomy
the women had similar chances of survival.
Researchers in Italy studied 701 women over two decades and found that
a quarter of both groups died from breast cancer.
Small tumours can be treated by lumpectomies
|
The US researchers also found little survival differences between the
1,851 women they studied.
They said that this is because breast cancer is fundamentally systemic
and not one that simply spreads from an initial site.

Breast-conserving surgery is therefore the treatment of choice for
women with relatively small breast cancers

|
|
Dr Umberto Veronesi
|
Dr Umberto Veronesi of the European Institute of Oncology in Milan said
women with small tumours should have breast-conserving surgery.
"Breast-conserving surgery is therefore the treatment of choice for
women with relatively small breast cancers.
"These results should dispel any lingering doubts about the safety and
efficacy of breast-conserving surgery as a treatment for breast cancer."
Choice
Delyth Morgan, chief executive of the charity Breakthrough Breast
Cancer, told the BBC that the new research underlined the importance of
choice for women and added that British surgeons had been advocating
breast-conserving surgery for years.
"In this country the tradition is very much for breast reconstruction
and breast conservation surgery so what this is doing is it should be
reassuring us thta we are doing the right thing."
But she stressed that in some cases mastectomy was still the best
option for some women.
A recent study by Canadian researchers found that some women with
suspected cancer may have had their breasts removed unnecessarily.
It said that women significantly overestimate their risks of developing
the disease and agree too easily to surgery to remove their breasts in an
effort to reduce their chances of developing cancer.