This article starts with an ethical dilemma that illustrates the
power of genetic testing, a power that may lead clinicians to initiate
genetic investigation inappropriately. The interpretation of genetic
tests depends on an accurate pedigree. This often involves checking
pathological data from distant members of the family. Also, genetic
tests may reveal information that, although interesting academically,
may not be useful for the patient or the family.
An abnormal genotype does not mean that serious future problems are
inevitable. The outlook of many genetic syndromes, even trisomy 21,
can be extremely variable. Clinicians who perform genetic tests need
to understand this and will often need help from geneticists, perhaps
to restrain genetic determinism. Obstetricians and gynaecologists
should be as cautious before ordering genetic tests as they would be
before committing the patient to a major surgical operation.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"