During the past decade, a
substantial body of evidence has emerged showing that low
birthweight or other indices of reduced fetal growth are
associated with a raised prevalence of cardiovascular disease
(CVD) in adult life and its antecedents, including raised
blood pressure, glucose intolerance and dyslipidaemia. These
comprise the metabolic or insulin-resistance syndrome
[1]. This evidence originated in studies carried out by
David Barker and his colleagues (described here by Barker),
but the findings have now been extensively replicated in
studies elsewhere. New findings described in his review
suggest that these effects of early growth retardation are
particularly evident in humans who show compensatory or
'catch-up' growth and later develop obesity. These studies
have led to the hypothesis that these common adult diseases
might originate during fetal development. It is suggested that
environmental factors affect the developing fetus, permanently
altering its morphology and physiology, and predisposing it to
the metabolic syndrome and CVD. This hypothesis is strongly
supported by animal experiments, which show that adverse
influences, such as undernutrition during gestation, result in
the birth of offspring with a variety of morphological and
physiological changes that, when combined with an
obesity-inducing diet, leads to diabetes and the metabolic
syndrome (see review by Ozanne and Hales).
These intriguing findings raise the question as to the nature
of the underlying processes that link early growth restriction
with these long-term health consequences. There is growing
evidence that an adverse early environment influences cellular
proliferation and the differentiation of several organ
systems. For example, maternal protein restriction in animal
models is associated with reductions in pancreatic
-cell
mass
[2], diminution in nephron number (see review by Dodic
et al.) and alterations in the zonation of the liver, with
an increased capacity for gluconeogenesis
[3]. Studies of humans show that low birthweight is
associated with adverse changes in body composition, with
increased adipose but reduced muscle mass
[4,5] . However, it is becoming clear that an important
way in which the early environment can have long-term effects
is by resetting key hormonal systems that control growth and
development. It is well established that these systems can be
'programmed' during development. For example, over 50 years
ago it was shown that the early differentiation of the
hypophysis into male or female depends on whether a testis is
present. Low concentrations of androgens in the perinatal
period imprint the hypothalamus so that gonadotrophins are
secreted in the female, cyclical pattern, whereas high
concentrations of androgens lead to the tonic secretion of
gonadotrophins, which is the male pattern
[6]. Manipulation of androgen or estrogen concentrations
soon after birth leads to changes in sexual behaviour. In
females, it also leads to the development of sterile
anovulation and polycystic ovaries. The central theme of this
special issue of TEM is that the early experience of an
individual affects the development of a diverse range of
hormonal systems, which, in turn, might influence the
predisposition to adult CVD and metabolic disease. It is
suggested that the biological 'purpose' of these mechanisms is
to adapt the organism to its environment. If a pregnant animal
is exposed to an unfavourable environment, such as
undernutrition, it is logical that the development of the
offspring should be adapted for that environment. If, however,
these offspring are relatively overnourished, the prenatal
programming might be inappropriate and lead to disease. This
is an attractive model that might well account for many of the
reported epidemiological findings.
There is compelling evidence from animal studies that the
hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis is highly
susceptible to programming during development, and recent
studies of humans have reported subtle alterations in the HPA
in association with low birthweight. Matthews reviews this
rapidly developing field and the possibility that the
adrenocortical response to stress might be altered by the
early environment. The sympathetic nervous system is known to
be highly plastic and susceptible to the influence of
environmental factors during development. One of these factors
is environmental temperature, and Young reviews the human and
animal evidence that thermoregulatory mechanisms involving the
sympathetic nervous system might be programmed during fetal
life. The theme of programming of reproductive function is
discussed by Davies and Norman. In the search for mechanisms
that could link the early environment with adult disease, the
growth hormoneinsulin growth factor-I axis has been proposed
as a candidate. As Holt describes in his review, this system
is known to be nutritionally regulated in the fetus and
abnormalities are reported in growth-retarded fetuses and
neonates. Finally, the reviews by Kennaway and Dodic et al.
are an important reminder that several vegetative hypothalamic
functions, such as circadian rhythmicity and the regulation of
fluid balance and appetite
[7], are also vulnerable to maternal influences.
Much of the work described in these reviews is groundbreaking
and clearly much remains to be done. However, the concept of
hormonal programming is now well established, and has become a
new frontier in endocrine research, which could have important
implications for public health.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"