Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/110/4/712

Pediatrics www.pedialink.org
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Browse & Search]


Full Text of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
P3Rs: Submit a response to this article
Similar articles found in:
Pediatrics Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Search Medline for articles by:
Nigrovic, L. E. || Malley, R.
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager
Collections under which this article appears:
Infectious Disease & Immunity
 


PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 712-719

 

Development and Validation of a Multivariable Predictive Model to Distinguish Bacterial From Aseptic Meningitis in Children in the Post-Haemophilus influenzae Era

Lise E. Nigrovic, MD*, Nathan Kuppermann, MD, MPH§ and Richard Malley, MD*,{ddagger}

 

* Department of Medicine
{ddagger} Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California

Context. Children with meningitis are routinely admitted to the hospital and administered broad-spectrum antibiotics pending culture results because distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis is often difficult.

Objective. To develop and validate a simple multivariable model to distinguish bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis in children using objective parameters available at the time of patient presentation.

Design. Retrospective cohort study of all children with meningitis admitted to 1 urban children’s hospital from July 1992 through June 2000, randomly divided into derivation (66%) and validation sets (34%).

Patients. Six hundred ninety-six previously healthy children aged 29 days to 19 years, of whom 125 (18%) had bacterial meningitis and 571 (82%) had aseptic meningitis.

Intervention. Multivariable logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses identified the following predictors of bacterial meningitis from the derivation set: Gram stain of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showing bacteria, CSF protein >=80 mg/dL, peripheral absolute neutrophil count >=10 000 cells/mm3, seizure before or at time of presentation, and CSF absolute neutrophil count >=1000 cells/mm3. A Bacterial Meningitis Score (BMS) was developed on the derivation set by attributing 2 points for a positive Gram stain and 1 point for each of the other variables.

Main Outcome Measure. The accuracy of the BMS when applied to the validation set.

Results. A BMS of 0 accurately identified patients with aseptic meningitis without misclassifying any child with bacterial meningitis in the validation set. The negative predictive value of a score of 0 for bacterial meningitis was 100% (95% confidence interval: 97%–100%). A BMS >=2 predicted bacterial meningitis with a sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval: 72%–96%).

Conclusions. The BMS accurately identifies children at low (BMS = 0) or high (BMS >=2) risk of bacterial meningitis. Outpatient management may be considered for children in the low-risk group.

 

Key Words: prediction model • bacterial meningitis • aseptic meningitis

 

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid • WBC, white blood cell count • Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b • ANC, absolute neutrophil count • RBC, red blood cells • ROC, receiver operating characteristic • BMS, Bacterial Meningitis Score • NPV, negative predictive value • CI, confidence interval • PPV, positive predictive value

 


Received for publication Feb 19, 2002; accepted May 20, 2002.



 

 

[For Subscribers]
Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. [Disclaimer]

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.