http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/110/4/712
|
|
||||||||
|
|
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 4 October 2002, pp. 712-719
![]()
![]()
* Department of Medicine
Divisions of
Infectious Diseases and Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Internal
Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics,
University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California
Context. Children with meningitis are routinely admitted to the hospital and administered broad-spectrum antibiotics pending culture results because distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis is often difficult.
Objective. To develop and validate a simple multivariable model to distinguish bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis in children using objective parameters available at the time of patient presentation.
Design. Retrospective cohort study of all children with meningitis admitted to 1 urban children’s hospital from July 1992 through June 2000, randomly divided into derivation (66%) and validation sets (34%).
Patients. Six hundred ninety-six previously healthy children aged 29 days to 19 years, of whom 125 (18%) had bacterial meningitis and 571 (82%) had aseptic meningitis.
Intervention. Multivariable logistic regression and recursive
partitioning analyses identified the following predictors of
bacterial meningitis from the derivation set: Gram stain of
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showing bacteria, CSF protein
80 mg/dL, peripheral
absolute neutrophil count
10 000
cells/mm3, seizure before or at time of presentation, and
CSF absolute neutrophil count
1000 cells/mm3. A Bacterial
Meningitis Score (BMS) was developed on the derivation set by
attributing 2 points for a positive Gram stain and 1 point for each
of the other variables.
Main Outcome Measure. The accuracy of the BMS when applied to the validation set.
Results. A BMS of 0 accurately identified patients with aseptic
meningitis without misclassifying any child with bacterial meningitis
in the validation set. The negative predictive value of a score
of 0 for bacterial meningitis was 100% (95% confidence interval:
97%–100%). A BMS
2 predicted bacterial
meningitis with a sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval:
72%–96%).
Conclusions. The BMS accurately identifies children at low (BMS
= 0) or high (BMS
2) risk of
bacterial meningitis. Outpatient management may be considered for
children in the low-risk group.
Key Words: prediction model • bacterial meningitis • aseptic meningitis
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid • WBC, white blood cell count • Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b • ANC, absolute neutrophil count • RBC, red blood cells • ROC, receiver operating characteristic • BMS, Bacterial Meningitis Score • NPV, negative predictive value • CI, confidence interval • PPV, positive predictive value
Received for publication Feb 19, 2002; accepted May 20, 2002.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.