Scottish doctors are to launch a new movement to stop NHS staff taking
cash and hospitality from drug companies.
Organisers of the campaign say doctors are prescribing medicines
according to which pharmaceutical company pays for their lunch rather
than what's in the best interest of patients.
Doctors will be asked to sign up to the group, No Free Lunch, by
taking a pledge to accept no money, gifts, or hospitality from the
pharmaceutical industry at the Glasgow launch later this month.
The move comes as an investigation by the Sunday Herald reveals
that NHS trusts are failing to keep meaningful registers of support
that staff receive from the pharmaceutical industry.
Despite senior NHS directors stating that registers of interests
should be made public, none of Scotland's hospital trusts disclose
details of how much their doctors are paid from pharmaceutical
companies. Four trusts admit not holding a register of staff interests
while two say the expenses paid to doctors for travel and hotel
accommodation by pharmaceutical companies are not included on the
list. Three trusts said there was nothing on the register for the last
financial year -- a claim doctors say could not possibly reflect the
true situation.
Dr Simon Maxwell, senior lecturer in clinical pharmacology and
therapeutics at Edinburgh University and a doctor at the city's
Western General Hospital, said: 'This is a nonsense. There isn't a
hospital in the country that doesn't have an active pharmaceutical
industry providing lunches and money to consultants to travel to
conferences, etc.
'I take a keen interest in this area and I had no idea of any
register of this sort. I was not aware of a general register that I
have to make a declaration to.'
Maxwell would like to see a register of interests for doctors
similar to the one held for MSPs. Anyone can find out how much MSPs
have received in travel, accommodation and dinner costs from
commercial organisations just by looking up the Scottish parliament
website.
'I believe we should have a voluntary register of interests for
doctors and I think this should be open,' he said. 'I think we would
be better knowing where everyone involved in sensitive decisions is
coming from.'
Fife NHS Trust stated that it did not maintain a register because
staff were not allowed to receive gifts or incentives. Forth Valley
Acute Hospitals NHS Trust guessed that around 10 doctors had received
travel expenses and accommodation costs from pharmaceutical companies
while Ayrshire and Arran Acute Hospitals NHS Trust disclosed that 13
doctors had declared receiving hospitality from drug firms in the last
financial year.
Directors of Greater Glasgow NHS, the health board for the whole of
the city, are among those who now believe payments doctors take from
drug companies should be made public.
Catriona Renfrew, director of planning and community health with
Greater Glasgow NHS said: 'We would regard access to this sort of
information as legitimate for the public to request.'
Nicola Sturgeon, shadow health minister, added: 'I think
transparency is very important. The public want to know that drugs are
prescribed for the right reasons, not because a GP has a particular
relationship with a drugs company.'
Health economist Dr Andrew Walker, senior lecturer in health
economics at Glasgow University's Robertson Centre for Biostatistics,
calculated that the pharmaceutical industry spends £10,000 on
marketing on each doctor every year.
This, says Dr Des Spence, a Glasgow GP who will lead the No Free
Lunch movement in Scotland, influences the medicines doctors
prescribe.
'Currently each GP spends roughly £150,000 of public money on
medications per year. Unlike any other public sector budget, the
doctors are largely unrestricted on which medications they choose to
prescribe and how this money is spent. I wonder how the public would
feel if teachers or the police had such financial independence?
Pharmaceutical companies market heavily to influence prescribing by
doctors and marketing budgets far outstrip research and development
spending. This often involves free lunches, weekend educational
meetings in hotels, trips to international conferences, educational
'grants' to doctors and some inexpensive 'gifts'. This marketing
process is highly effective at changing prescribing patterns. None of
this 'soft entertainment' is illegal and it's governed by a voluntary
code of practice.
'We'd argue that doctors and nurses have a public duty not to take
any form of promotion from the industry. However, this may be 'wrapped
up' as education.'
Spence, who has refused offers from pharmaceutical companies of
trips to Dublin, Stobo Castle near Peebles, Gleneagles and St Andrews,
added: 'In some of the health centres, a meal is provided most days
and people go along and see the reps. A lot of people don't see any
problem with that.'
Dr Malcolm Macleod, a neurology registrar at the Western General
Hospital in Edinburgh, is opposed to pharmaceutical companies paying
for doctors to attend scientific conferences, but says under the
present system, medics are obliged to take their cash. Macleod admits
that, on a recent trip to America for a conference, a drug company
paid £250 towards his fare.
'I was going to America for a conference and the total cost was
£1400. I was £250 short and approached the drug company,' he said.
'There might have been other non-pharma sources around if I'd looked
hard enough, but not as easy to get hold of.'
Macleod was also offered a trip to Copenhagen by a drug company and
was told that he would have plenty of time to go shopping. He points
out that as the NHS spends around 20% of its budget buying drugs from
the pharmaceutical industry and as the drug companies spend around 12%
of their budget on marketing drugs to doctors, the NHS is indirectly
paying for drug reps to take doctors out to lunch.
The No Free Lunch movement is already running in the US. Doctors
and nurses are asked to 'just say no to drug reps'. To join the group
they must pledge to receive no money, gifts or hospitality and not to
rely on medical information handed out by drug companies.
The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry says it does
not see the need for NHS staff to join up. Spokesman Richard Ley said:
'There shouldn't be any occasion when hospitality is offered to
doctors when it is not part of a seminar or workshop. It's more about
doctors making sure that everything is seen to be above board.'
The Scottish Executive passed the responsibility for a register of
doctors' interests on to individual trusts. A spokeswoman said: 'It's
for trusts and NHS boards to implement procedures which guarantee the
maintenance of high standards in public life. It's for them to
determine the need to keep a record of hospitality received from the
drug industry.'
Anything to declare? The records hospitals keep
Argyll and Clyde Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Holds a register but
nothing on it in last 12 months
Ayrshire and Arran Acute Hospitals NHS Trust 13 doctors declared
receiving hospitality from drug firms in last financial year
Borders Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Refuses to answer questions on
doctors' interests
Dumfries and Galloway Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Secret register,
does not include travel and accommodation paid by drug companies
Fife Acute Hospitals NHS Trust No register
Forth Valley Acute Hospitals NHS Trust No register, guesses 10
doctors received travel expenses from drug firms
Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust Holds a secret register
Highland Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Holds a secret register, does
not record amounts of cash received
Lanarkshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Register does not include
payments for travel and hotel accommodation paid by drug firms
Lothian University Hospitals NHS Trust Holds a secret register
North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust Holds a register,
nothing on it for last two years
South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust No register
Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust No register
West Lothian Healthcare NHS Trust Secret register
Yorkhill NHS Trust Holds a register, nothing on it in last 12
months