Bills aim to cut errors by boosting doctor communication
Better electronic medical records and efficient dissemination of best
practices are two goals.
By
Michael J. Bernstein, AMNews correspondent. Oct. 14, 2002.
Additional information
Washington -- When it comes to legislation to reduce medical mistakes,
the question of how to develop an error-reporting system has taken center
stage over the past few years. But bills wending their way through
Congress also contain provisions on a much less glitzy topic --
information sharing -- that could have a major impact on physician
practices.
Two virtually identical House measures would require the federal
government to develop voluntary, national information-sharing standards to
ensure that doctors in all settings can have easy access to the most
current information about treatment and diagnosis.
The goal is to develop uniform computer programs that could be readily
accessed by all doctors. For example, one aim is to have improved
electronic medical records and prescriptions.
Drafters of the legislation also said improved computerized information
systems would benefit doctors by reducing paperwork, as well as
eliminating redundant record-keeping, medical tests and patient
history-taking.
The enhanced information system not only would inform doctors about
medical errors, but would also provide them with an easy way to learn
about the best current practices and the latest research breakthroughs.
To address the information exchange issue, the House bills would create
a Medical Information Technology Advisory Board within two years. The
board would be composed of a variety of experts -- from clinicians to
government officials to information technology specialists.
It would have 30 months to issue a report recommending the best means
of developing computer programs that would contain uniform, clearly
written medical information programs for doctors in private practice and
in hospitals. Additionally, the report would spell out how to keep medical
records secure under any new computer system that enables doctors to share
information about patients.
Improving the process for exchanging medical information is critical to
reducing the number of medical errors, said Susan Dovey, PhD, an analyst
at the Robert Graham Center, Washington, D.C.
"The primary concern of practicing physicians is with information
management -- sorting out patients with ill-defined symptoms and deciding
how to treat them," said Dr. Dovey, lead author of a study categorizing
medical errors published in early September in Quality and Safety in
Healthcare. The "sheer volume of information coming from labs,
insurers and other physicians" is mind-boggling, she added.
The answer to the problem is to improve physicians' personal
communication skills and computerized communication systems so that
practices have access to as much current medical information as possible,
Dr. Dovey said.
According to Donald M. Berwick, MD, president and CEO of the Institute
for Healthcare Improvement, health professionals aren't using the best
medical practices because not enough current medical information is
reaching them.
The processes whereby doctors and others obtain their medical
information are inefficient, outdated and not capable of reporting the
rapidly growing mountain of new medical information to them clearly and
promptly, he said.
"There is a deluge of scientific information, and there is a mystical
view that physicians are able to process all of it," Dr. Berwick said. "If
travel agents acted the way doctors do, they would be memorizing all of
the flight schedules."
He advocates development of a standard electronic patient-records
system designed to provide information useful to hospital staffs and small
private physician practices. Large health care systems have already
developed the means to inform staff about which medical procedures work
and which don't, he said.
The legislative front
In September, the medical error bills passed in two House committees.
At press time, the legislation awaited consideration by the full chamber.
In addition to improving information sharing, the measures are designed
to improve quality by encouraging physicians and others to voluntarily
report errors and near misses to patient-safety organizations. The PSOs
would analyze reported errors, offer feedback to prevent future mistakes
and catalog the findings in a database that would show national trends in
medical mistakes.
The bill passed by the House Ways and Means Committee has drawn strong
backing from many health care groups, including the American Medical
Association and the American College of Physicians--American Society of
Internal Medicine.
"This clearinghouse effect for information on medical errors will give
practitioners the ability to learn from others' mistakes," said AMA
Trustee Timothy Flaherty, MD. "This can lead to an exploration of
solutions by sharing experiences with medical errors."
The Bush administration also supports the bill.
The various measures are the latest of several congressional efforts to
address the problem of medical errors spurred by the 1999 Institute of
Medicine report. It estimated that up to 98,000 patients a year die from
medical errors and that this problem costs the nation $37.6 billion a
year.
Previous efforts became bogged down in debate over whether information
on medical errors could be used against doctors and hospitals in medical
malpractice cases or other proceedings. The same issue is putting full
congressional passage in doubt again this year.
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, Mass.), chair of the Health, Education, Labor
and Pensions Committee, opposes the Senate voluntary error-reporting
bill's confidentiality language. He said the House and Senate measures
don't properly balance encouraging reporting of medical errors with
maintaining legal remedies for patients.
The House and Senate bills state that any reported patient-safety
information would be "privileged and confidential." That is, information
on reported errors could not be used against doctors or other health care
workers in civil or administrative actions, such as disciplinary,
malpractice or other civil proceedings.
The American Medical Association and ACP-ASIM have generally supported
the confidentiality language, agreeing that it would adequately protect
health care professionals and encourage them to report errors.
The AMA, however, has urged that the House bills extend this protection
to criminal cases, as the Senate bill does with limited exceptions.
Back to top.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Patient safety stances
The House and Senate patient safety bills generally cover the same
ground but have some differences.
Who would be affected: The House version would require doctors,
hospitals and other health organizations who participate in Medicare to
voluntarily report medical errors. The Senate bill would not restrict
reporting to only those participating in Medicare.
Impact on state laws: The House version would not preempt or
affect any state mandatory error reporting law. The Senate bill's
voluntary reporting language would preempt such mandatory
requirements.
Patient safety database: The House bill would require creation of a
patient safety database. The Senate version would make such a project
voluntary.
Technology advisory board: The House version calls for creation of
a Medical Information Technology Advisory Board that would report on the
best practices in medical information technology and recommend methods of
implementing these practices. The Senate bill does not create such an
advisory group.
Back to top.
Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.
