http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Anthrax-New-Treatments.html
|
October 17, 2001 Progress Made in Anthrax Cure Search
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 2:15 a.m. ET The search for novel treatments to cure gravely ill victims of inhaled
anthrax has taken on new urgency, but experts caution they are still probably
years away from useful new medicines. The research targets the most insidious aspect of this frightening disease:
By the time symptoms start, it is often too late to do anything. By then, anthrax bacteria have flooded the bloodstream with deadly poison.
Killing the germs with antibiotics may not help much, because the damage is
already done. Scientists are working on ways to block this toxin so it does not enter
blood cells after being released by the bacteria. Several teams are working
on competing approaches, and researchers say they have made significant
headway in recent months. If the treatments work in people as well as they seem to in lab animals,
they will probably be given along with antibiotics in the future as a one-two
punch. The search for new anthrax treatments ``has always been of great interest,
but it obviously will get ratcheted up,'' Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Tuesday. His agency and the Defense Department have financed most of the research.
He said they hope to back more research, as well as speed up testing of any
new drugs that are discovered. ``The fact that somebody has died from inhalation of anthrax spores for
the first time in 25 years has certainly galvanized a lot of people into
action,'' said Dr. Robert Liddington, who studies the poison's atom-by-atom
structure at the Burnham Institute in San Diego. If anthrax enters the body through a break in the skin, it causes a sore
that is easily cured with antibiotics. Bacteria inhaled deep into the lungs
are far more serious. They can lead to a bloodstream infection that begins
with vague, flu-like symptoms and quickly progresses to shock and death. ``You feel a little sick one day, and the next they put you on a
ventilator,'' said Dr. Philip Hanna of the University of Michigan. By the time the first symptoms appear, the bacteria have already spewed
out their toxin. This poison seeps into blood cells called macrophages. There
it prompts the cells to manufacture normally useful disease-fighting
substances, then kills them, releasing the substances in dangerously high
quantities. To block this process, scientists at the U.S. Army Medical Research
Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., have screened dozens
of antibodies against the poison. Two that seem to work are being
investigated at the University of Texas at Austin. The bacteria actually make three different proteins to poison cells. One
is called protective antigen. (It got that deceptively innocent name because
it is also part of the anthrax vaccine reserved for military use.) The other
two are edema factor and lethal factor. Protective antigen starts the process. It hooks onto blood cells and opens
a hole that lets edema factor and the even more deadly lethal factor ooze
inside. The antibodies block this by covering up the spot the protective
antigen uses to anchor itself on the cells. Dr. John Collier of Harvard Medical School developed another approach. He
makes slightly altered forms of protective antigen. It takes seven good
copies of the antigen to make the hole for poison to enter cells. He found
that even one bogus copy of the antigen keeps the hole from forming. Both the antibodies and the fake antigen have been found to protect lab
animals from the effects of anthrax toxin, and experts say the next step will
be against the actual bacteria, which can only be done at high-security labs.
Nevertheless, Collier says human testing could start within a year. ^------ Medical Editor Daniel Q. Haney is a special correspondent for The
Associated Press. ^------ On the Net: |
||||
|
|
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.