http://www.trufax.org/vaccine/v2.html
Serial Passage of Vaccine Components Through Animal Cell Lines
According to the vaccination paradigm promulgated by medical companies, the
passage of viruses through animal cell lines is necessary in order to reduce
the toxicity of the viruses to humans. This belief is contraindicated by
historical evidence.
Back in the 1940's there was a campaign in French West Africa to immunize
population groups to yellow fever virus. The virus was passed through mouse
cell cultures 258 times, and the mice who were paralyzed had their brains
ground up and dried, and this preparation was used to "innoculate"
over 100,000 people in 1944. This resulted in over 100 cases of brain damage
(meningioencephalitis) and 18 deaths.
The SV-40 Virus Contamination of Vaccine Cultures
In 1960 it was discovered that millions of polio vaccine doses produced in
the early 1950's from monkey kidney cells were infected with simian virus 40 (SV-40),
which was found in both Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. SV-40 is resistant to
the "neutralizing effects" of the carcinogenic germicide formalin
added to the vaccines, and was passed on to millions of people who now have
SV-40 as part of their genetic structure. SV-40 is one example of a DNA polyoma
virus. Polyoma (many tumor-causing) viruses cause prolonged infection where
tissue is destroyed, integrate into the hosts genetic material, are capable of
mutating a cell, may reproduce after coming into contact with a
"helper" virus, enable the separate replication of the viral genome,
can generate immune responses, and they can induce malignancy.
Scientists are amazed at how little genetic information these viruses carry
in proportion to the damage they can cause. Also, with polyoma viruses, it
becomes impossible to detect the viral genome once it has been integrated, and
it may reappear if the transformed cells are fused to others which are
naturally permissive for SV-40 or other polyoma viruses.There have not been
many statistical studies done, for obvious reasons, to determine all of the
long term effects of polio immunization; it is known that polio vaccines
injected into humans before 1962 contained SV-40. This was documented in an
article in 1969 in Science Magazine, a Journal Of The American Association for
the Advancement of Science. It was an article by Dr. Joseph Fraumeni entitled
"Simian Virus 40 in Polio Vaccine: Follow-up of Newborn Recipients".
It stated that SV-40 virus was an unrecognized contaminant if virus vaccines
prepared in monkey kidney cell cultures prior to 1962. However, the SV-40 virus
was recognized by Dr. Hillman in 1960, which does not explain the two-year gap
in "lack of recognition" and suppression of this information that followed.
Legalese defines the word contamination, with respect to vaccines, as something
external to the manufacturing process, and does not permit the public
dissemination of the fact that the SV-40 virus already existed in the cultures
used to prepare the "polio vaccine". SV-40 is an oncogenic
(cancer-causing) virus.
According to the report, "from 1960 to 1962, polio vaccine in various
forms and regimens was given to 1077 newborn infants at the Cleveland
Metropolitan General Hospital, in a study to assess the feasibility of
introducing active immunity to poliomyelitis in the presence of maternal
antibodies. Normal term infants were assigned with parental consent to one of
six study groups. An attenuated poliomyelitis vaccine was given orally to 925
infants; some received very high concentrations of S-40 within a few hours of
birth. The remaining 152 children were injected with large doses of inactivated
polio vaccine which had smaller concentration of SV-40 than the oral
preparations. Later in infancy, all the chidden received "booster"
injections of attenuated or inactivated polio vaccine, or both, which
presumably contained SV-40. Since 1964, we have made periodic efforts to
determine the death rate among the vaccinated children, who were from an urban,
low socioeconomic, highly mobile, predominantly Negro population."
An analysis of the above reveals staggering gaps in logic that support the
premise that it may well have been done deliberately to study the negative
effects of the vaccine. The study purports to have been performed in order to
"evaluate antibody formation" in newborn vaccines, but in defiance of
the orthodox definition of an empirical study, no control group was used or
selected so that such an evaluation could take place. Follow-ups were made to
determine death rate and not state of health. The parental consent forms
detailed no risks involved with the experiment that would bar the parents from
signing. The health state of vaccines at the time of the report was not
mentioned. Clearly, either total incompetence or negligence was involved, or
the study was done to assess the known negative results to those vaccinated.
Evidence points to the latter, and this constitutes a criminal act.
SV-40 is also a DNA virus. A study on DNA viruses was completed in 1966, and
the results of the study were published in a 1967 edition of the American
Journal of Pathology; the results clearly showed the known connection between
such viruses and cancer: "A number of viruses containing DNA have been
shown to induce tumors when inoculated into newborn animals. Members of the
papovavirus group, mouse polyoma, and simian virus 40, all adenoviruses, are
now recognized as oncogenic (cancer-causing) when tested by this method".
An article by M.A. Israel, "Molecular Cloning of Polyoma Virus DNA in
E-Coli", published in Science Magazine in 1979 described the use of
Polyoma DNA in molecular cloning into E.Coli for the purpose of ongenicity
(production of a cancer-causing virus). It only takes 10 or 20 particles of polyoma
per cell to cause malignancies. Matrix III volume one describes in
detail the research done at the National Cancer Institute in producing
cancer-causing viruses under the guise of cancer research.
Research indicates that there is an unusual feature to these viruses, in that
the tumors they eventually cause appear to be virus-free, making it
impossible to detect viral causation in tumors induced by these viruses. Over
500 million people have been inadvertently innoculated with SV-40.
SV-40 an Integral Part of Genetically Engineered Products
When a genetically engineered product is manufactured, a probe, plasmid or
vector is an essential part of the process; these can be defined as a specific
kind of molecular structure that permits the passage and insertion of one type
of DNA into the genetic material of the organism used to manufacture the
genetically engineered substance. Some of the newest genetically engineered
products for sale are those "vaccines" against "AIDS". Most
of these vector probes contain SV-40 or portions of SV-40 as part of their
structures, SV-40 being a very important active component in the process. Any
review of the various symposia conducted on genetic engineering makes it
clearly obvious that it is an important factor in recombining viruses and
genetic material (recombinant genetic engineering). Due to the influence of the
SV-40 base, various other viruses are eagerly assimilated. Sometimes, in
genetic literature, SV-40 is called "plasmid pMV104, which uses SV-40 as
its origin but hides the immediate relationship with SV-40 from public perusal.
The action of the presence of Sv-40 material is analogous to that of DMSO, in
that it acts like a "wheelbarrow" to carry other substances into an
otherwise well-protected cellular body; this is the main reason why an
individuals' subsequent reaction and susceptibility to environmental pollutants
after injection with a vaccine.
Supporting these lines of thought, an article in the January 6, 1962 Science
News- letter indicated that "common human viruses act as carriers in
causing cancer by interacting with cancer-causing chemicals; this has been
indicated by experiments which show that cancer-causing substances that are
present in too small a quantity by itself will become active and create tumors
when combined with single doses of virus. Malignant tumors appeared in five
type of injected mice." The viruses mentioned were ECHO9, B-4, Coxsackie,
and Poliovirus 2. The article further indicated that "viruses may also
activate other cancer causing substances besides chemicals in the environment,
such as DMBA, AF, and DBA."
The Use of Animal Cell Line Substrates for Human Vaccines
In our current cultural situation, medical drugs are generally dividied into
three categories: (1) Pharmaceuticals, (2) Biologicals and (3) Genetically
Engineered Products, which now include sera (plural of serum), vaccines
and blood derivatives. Most vaccines are manufactured using what are called continuous
cell lines (CCL), usually animal tissue based, which provide the raw materials
having specific biological properties which serve as the substrate for
production of genetically engineered (biotech) drugs. In the past, vaccines
were made solely from individual lots of animal tissues or human disease by
products.The main aspect of CCL that is attractive to vaccine manufacturers is
an infinite lifespan and a high growth rate, but the problems are
"biochemical, biological and genetic variability in terms of the
production of transforming proteins and potentially oncogenic (cancer-causing)
DNA, contaminating viruses and predisposition to tumors in animals."
J.B. Griffiths from the United Kingdom gave a presentation in 1988 in which he
stated "it is now generally accepted that continuous cell lines are
acceptable as substrates for the production of biologicals, provided that the
manufacturing process yields no detectable risk attributed to the
cell subtrate." Three French doctors in 1988 warned of hazards from
introducing plasmid DNA into mammalian cells, "since part of the
regulatory genetic elements used in the expression vectors (plasmids) is
often virus-derived, and the presence of these DNA sequences in the
final product represents a potential risk."
Known Simian Disease Epidemics
Since simians (monkeys) are the prime creature that is used for animal
research, it is no surprise that the urge to perform experiments between
species, a post Atlantean tendency, was due to fall on them. As a result,
outbreaks of cancer occurred in primate laboratories worldwide. In one
experiment documented in the Journal of the American Veterinary Association,
human blood laced with leukemia was deliberately injected in gibbon monkeys
under the guise of "malaria experiments", and watched as the speed of
action and the severity of the virus increased with the program of infecting
more and more animals. During a period between 1969 and 1973 a leukemia
epidemic affected 900 inbred Hamadryas baboons at an experimental animal
station in Soviet Georgia. These monkeys were then shipped to Litton Bionetics
in Kensington, Maryland, a laboratory that had such a bad containment record
that even the National Cancer Institute called it "grossly
irresponsible", according to an article in a 1979 Science Journal. Other
violations of containment were reported an another infamous laboratory run by
Litton: the Frederick Cancer Research Center. In 1971 and again in 1973,
researchers were "surprised" at the occurrence of two epidemics of
leukemia in gibbons which happened "unexpectedly" at the Medical Research
Lab of SEATO in Bangkok, Thailand.
From November 1969 to November 1982, a continuous AIDS-like illness was
observed among primates worldwide. The illness had the following symptoms:
diseased lymph nodes, enlarged spleen, fever, diarrhea, weigh-loss, and
infection with microorganisms. These scientists were perfectly aware that
transmission of a virus from a species that is a natural host to a species that
is not, causes mutations and an increase in virulence, but did the experiments
anyway, with total disregard for others in the society.
In the Primate Research Center in Beaverton, Oregon, the population of black
macaque monkeys, between 1978 and 1983, contracted what scientists referred to
as "simian AIDS". The high peak for the epidemic was in 1980, at the
start of the Reagan-Bush administration. Of course, we all know about the Ebola
Reston incident from the book The Hot Zone.
Vaccination and Genetic Change: Mobility of Genetic Material Between Life
Forms
One of the indications that vaccinations may in fact be changing the genetic
structure of humans became evident in September of 1971, when scientists at the
University of Geneva made the discovery that biological substances entering
directly into the bloodstream could become part of human genetic structure.
Originally, Japanese bacteriologists discovered that bacteria of one species
transferred their own specific antibiotic resistance to bacteria of an entirely
different species. Dr. Maurice Stroun and Dr. Philip Anker in the Department of
Plant Physiology at the University of Geneva, began to accumulate evidence that
the transfer of genetic information is not confined to bacteria, but can also
occur between bacteria and higher plants and animals. According to an article
in World Medicine on September 22, 1971, "Geneva scientists are
convinced that normal animal and plant cells shed DNA, and that this DNA is
taken up by other cells in the organism."
In one experiment, scientists in Geneva extracted the auricles of frog
hearts and dipped them for several hours in a suspension of bacteria.
Afterward, they found a high percentage of RNA-DNA hybridization between
bacterial DNA extracted from bacteria of the same species as that used in the
experiment and titrated DNA extracted from the auricles which had been dipped
in the bacterial suspension. Bacterial DNA had been absorbed by the animal
cells. This phenomenon has been dubbed transcession. There is evidence
that this kind of phenomenon is happening all the time within the human body.
It is conceivable, for example, that heart damage following rheumatic fever
could the the result of the immune system reacting to its own cells producing a
foreign RNA complex after absorption of foreign DNA.
In Science magazine, November 10, 1972, bacterial RNA was
demonstrated in frog brain cells after a bacterial peritoneal infection. In the
April 1973 issue of the Journal of Bacteriology, transcription of
spontaneously released bacterial DNA was found to be incorporated into cellular
nuclei of frog auricles. Studies by Phillipe Anker and Maurice Stroun have
indicated spontaneous release of DNA material from mammalian cells, spontaneous
transfer of DNA from bacteria to higher organisms, spontaneous transfer of DNA
between cells of higher organisms, release of RNA by mammalian cells, and biological
activity of released complexes containing RNA.
Malignant Cellular Transformations Caused By Foreign DNA
There is evidence that freely circulating foreign DNA can cause malignancy.
In a 1977 issue of International Review of Cytology, Volume 51, Anker and
Stroun discuss the possible effects of foreign DNA causing malignant cell
transformations. When foreign DNA is transcribed into a cell of a different
organism, "this general biological event is related to the uptake by cells
of spontaneously released bacterial DNA, thus suggesting the existence of
circulating DNA. In view of the malignant transformations obtained with DNA,
the oncogenic (cancer-causing) role of circulating DNA is postulated."
The discovery in 1975 that viruses causing cancer in animals had a special
enzyme called reverse transcriptase makes the problem even more
interesting. These kind of viruses are called RNA viruses. When an RNA
virus has the reverse transcriptase enzyme within its structure, it allows the
virus to actually form strands of DNA which easily integrate with the DNA of
the host cell which it infects. Studies by Dr. Robert Simpson of Rutgers
University indicate that RNA viruses which do not cause cancer can also fom
DNA, even without the presence of reverse transcriptase. DNA formed in this way
from an RNA virus is called a provirus. It is known that some
non-cancerous viruses have a tendency to exist as proviruses for long
periods of time in cells without causing any apparent disease. In other words,
they remain latent. Some examples of common RNA viruses that do not
cause cancer, per se, but have the capacity to form proviruses are
influenza, measles, mumps and polio viruses. In the October 22, 1967 British
Medical Journal, it was brought out by German scientists that multiple
sclerosis seemed to be provoked by vaccinations against smallpox, typhoid,
tetanus, polio, tuberculosis and diptheria. Even earlier, in 1965, Zintchenko
reported 12 cases in which MS became evident after a course of antirabies
vaccinations. Remember that millions of people between 1950 and 1970 were
injected with polio vaccines containing simian virus 40 (SV-40) transferred
from contaminated monkey kidney cells used to culture the vaccine. It is
impossible to remove animal viruses from vaccine cultures. You are reminded
that SV-40, the 40th virus to be discovered in simian tissue, is a
cancer-causing virus.
Immunization programs against influenza, measles, mumps and polio are in
fact seeding humans with RNA and forming proviruses which become latent for
long periods in throughout the body, only to re-awaken later on. Post-polio
syndrome is a good example of this problem. Other examples may include the
so-called mesenchymal and collegen diseases, such as rheumatoid
arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus erythmatosis, where antibodies are
formed by the immune system against the person's own tissues - tissues which
have been impregnated with foreign genetic material. According to a special
issue of Postgraduate Medicine in May 1962, "although the body generally
will not make antibodies against its own tissues, it appears that slight
modification of the antigenic character of tissues may cause it to appear
foreign to the immune system and thus a fair target for antibody
production." Two years later in 1964, studies were conducted on the polyoma
virus, a tumor-producing DNA virus. It was discovered that the persistent
genetic DNA material in the polyoma virus brought about malignant
transformations in hamster embryo cell cultures. This was reported in the November
23, 1964 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Even common non-tumor viruses, including those in smallpox vaccine and polio
virus 2, can act as carcinogens. It was reported in Science on December
15, 1961 that these common viruses acted as catalysts in producing cancer
when given to mice in combination with known organic carcinogens in amounts
too small to induce tumors themselves. This means that some vaccinations will
induce cancer, when combined with the growing problem of environmental
pollution from toxic by-products of agriculture (pesticides on and in food) and
industry. Of course, this information is hidden from the public, which is why
the FDA, EPA and the agricultural industries can get away with
"sanctioning" small amounts of pollutants in food, water and air. The
connection has not been made public, much to the joy of the chemical industry,
the National Cancer Institute and the growing cancer industry, which continues
to fraudulently solicit public donations to justify its own existence. As an
aside, it has alreadybeen admitted that polio vaccinations have caused 100% of
all polio in the United States since 1980 and the predominant cases of all
paralytic polio since 1972 (Science, April 4, 1977). It is suspected
that the Salk and Sabin vaccines, made of moneky tissue culture, have also been
responsible for the major increase in leukemia in the United States.
The use of viruses, bacteria and animal tissue cultures in mass immunization
campaigns, considering that this information has been known for 20 years,
constitutes an intentionally created hazard to humans. The global impact
on the wide range of genotypes relative to human beings is difficult to assess,
but the outcome is definitely negative, and permitting the seeding of latent
proviruses in humans, knowingly, can have no other rationale other than
future medical profiteering, and constitutes a criminal conspiracy of vast
proportions which is tatamount to a genocidal policy against the population,
further constituting crimes against humanity, which is internationally
punishable by death. But, of course, especially in the United States, this
fact is ignored and suppressed from public knowledge, despite a 1984 plea by
some U.S. physicians to the United Nations in a report. The fact that this goes
on with the full knowledge of the world medical community makes this an international
conspiracy where the population has no recourse, given that vaccinations
are becoming mandatory and a prerequisite for many social programs.
Persistence of long-term viruses and foreign proteins and their relationship
to chronic and degenerative disease was also pointed out by Dr. Robert Simpson
of Rutgers University in 1976, when he addressed science writers at an American
Cancer Society seminar, saying "these proviruses could be molecules in
search of a disease." Dr. Wendell Winters, a virologist at the University
of California noted, "immunizations may cause changes in slow viruses and
changes in the DNA mechanism." Although host cells containing latent viral
particles operate more or less normally, they begin to synthesize viral
proteins under the guidance of the viral DNA, eventually creating the
circumstances for various autoimmune diseases, including diseases of the
central nervous system, which unfortunately add to the growing load of aberrant
social behavior patterns.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.