Homeopathy Proves Effective In Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Contrary to the overwhelming belief of the mainstream medical establishment, results from a recent series of trials suggest that homeopathy is more effective than an inactive pill (placebo) in treating certain ills.

·         Researchers studied 51 patients with perennial hay fever. Twenty-four of the study subjects received daily homeopathy and 27 received a daily placebo treatment during the 4-week study period.

·         The study was performed to the highest standards of scientific research, being double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled.

·         All of the subjects kept a diary in which they recorded twice daily their nasal air flow measurements and symptoms such as sneezing, runny nose, and eye and chest symptoms.

• Patients who received homeopathy had a 28% improvement in their nasal air flow whereas those in the placebo group had only a 3% improvement.

In comments to Reuters Health, study author Dr. David Reilly of the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital states "There are two ways of interpreting the fact that four trials in a row have produced positive results," Either homeopathy works, in which case "we need to explore the clinical potential and the scientific challenges, (or) homeopathy does not work (and) the clinical trial is proving an unreliable tool capable of worrying false positive results."

In an accompanying editorial, Tim Lancaster of the Oxford Institute of Health Sciences and Andrew Vickers of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, acknowledge that the methods employed by Dr. Reilly and his colleagues "were rigorous and it is unlikely that their results arose from methodological bias."

They also admit that if this study can be confirmed by a larger trial it could really change the thinking of mainstream medicine towards homeopathy.

British Medical Journal August 19, 2000;321:471-476.

COMMENT: I don't use much homeopathy, but that is largely related to the fact that I have not had enough time to study it carefully enough to use it properly. I do find though that many homeopaths tend to continue in their traditional paradigm and use their homeopathics as a substitute for drugs. Clearly they are better and far safer than drugs, but unless they address the underlying causes they will not resolve the health complaint at its deepest level. Homeopathics are not a substitute for optimizing the diet, and resolving emotional and spiritual conflicts. It is good to see that this form of energy medicine is receiving good reviews in a very respectable journal.

Return To Table of Contents Issue #168

©Copyright 1997-2001 by Joseph M. Mercola, DO. All Rights Reserved. This content may be copied in full, with copyright; contact; creation; and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.

Disclaimer - Newsletters are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola. They are not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and they are not intended as medical advice. They are intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional.