http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/14/anthrax_vaccine/index_np.html
The anthrax vaccine scandal
Why did the Pentagon allow BioPort Corp. to remain the sole U.S.
supplier of a crucial weapon against bioterror despite years of failure to
deliver the vaccine?
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Laura
Rozen
Oct. 13, 2001 | WASHINGTON -- With
each new confirmed anthrax infection raising fears of a wider bioterror attack
in the U.S., pressure is mounting on the Defense Department and the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) to give the green light to Michigan-based BioPort
Corporation, the nation's lone anthrax-vaccine manufacturer, to ship new lots
of the vaccine to the Pentagon.
Anthrax vaccine shipments from BioPort have been suspended by the FDA since
1998 because of questions about the facility's quality control, forcing the
Pentagon to dramatically reduce its program to vaccinate all 2.4 million U.S.
soldiers and reservists against anthrax. Now the lack of the vaccine threatens
to become a scandal, as the U.S. is sending thousands of soldiers overseas, calling
up reserves, and as the public is clamoring for access to protection from the
deadly bacterium.
After three years of getting bailed out by the Defense Department, BioPort
could be poised to make a fortune -- as its CEO Fuad El-Hibri did working with
the British seller of anthrax vaccine, Porton International, during the Gulf
War a decade ago. But only if the FDA approves the company's renovated plant,
as expected, sometime in the next week. The decision could open the door for
BioPort to market the drug to a worried public, as new anthrax scares are
reported daily.
The story of the troubled U.S. anthrax-vaccine program is a tangled saga of
science, politics, private-sector deal-making and national security. There have
been persistent questions about the vaccine's safety and effectiveness. Critics
say Defense Department studies have never proven the vaccine works against the
more dangerous inhaled form of anthrax, only against cutaneous, or skin
anthrax. Some military personnel have complained of mysterious illnesses after
taking the vaccine, and at least 400 have been disciplined for refusing the
mandatory inoculation. But the Pentagon insists the vaccine is both effective
and safe. Even now, some researchers say the vaccine is seriously outdated, as
BioPort gears up to ship more.
Then there are questions about BioPort's role as the nation's only anthrax
vaccine maker. How did Fuad El-Hibri, 43, a German-born entrepreneur and former
director of British vaccine-maker Porton Products, come to have so much control
over the West's supply of anthrax vaccine? Why didn't the Pentagon turn to a
larger, more established drug-maker for the crucial anti-biowarfare weapon? And
how could it let BioPort remain the sole maker of the vaccine after it failed
repeatedly to gain FDA approval for its renovated facility?
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Want to read more? This article is Salon
Premium content and only available to subscribers. Find out more or if
you're already a member log in here.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.