|
YOUNG VICTIMS
WOUNDED BY LEGISLATION
Saturday, November
23, 2002
By KATHIE DURBIN, Columbian staff writer
Andrea Garcia of Vancouver found out Thursday
that 11th-hour language tucked into the massive Homeland Security Act
reduces the chances her 5-year-old autistic son, Austin, will win
damages in a suit against drug companies she blames for his neurological
disability.
Her first reaction after her lawyer called with the news was
anger.
"I was really pissed," the mother of three said. "I thought, 'I'm
not going to let them walk away from this.' They need to take
responsibility for what has happened."
Her son's lawsuit involves the mercury-containing preservative
Thimerosal, manufactured by the Indianapolis-based pharmaceutical giant
Eli Lilly Co. since 1930.
Thimerosal has been used as a vaccine preservative for decades
but was added to several additional childhood vaccines in the 1990s so
they could be packaged in multiple-dose vials.
During the decade, as many as 30 million young children may have
been exposed to mercury in doses that far exceeded federal safety
standards. Over the same period, the number of children diagnosed with
autism skyrocketed.
In 1999, the U.S. Public Health Service and the American Academy
of Pediatrics told drug companies to produce a Thimerosal-free vaccine
within two years.
Austin attends a special class at Eisenhower Elementary School.
With a vocabulary of about 10 words, he struggles to communicate. "I
can't even imagine being in his body," his mother said. "It's very
frustrating for him because he tries to get what he wants out, but he
can't."
Garcia wants to know what her son's disability has to do with
homeland security.
"My son will never be the same, and it's not his fault," Garcia
said. "These companies should have known better. They should have
checked this out more thoroughly before putting it into shots."
Garcia and many other parents of autistic children are convinced
that the high cumulative doses of mercury their young children received
helped trigger the onset of autism. The prestigious Institute of
Medicine concluded last year that a link between Thimerosal and
neurological damage to children, though unproven, was "biologically
plausible," and called for more research.
100 families filed lawsuits
The Garcias are among 100 families touched by autism who filed
class-action lawsuits last year in a national campaign to hold the drug
companies legally liable for damages and require them to pay for
research and medical monitoring. The drug companies deny responsibility.
Last week, during final negotiations on a bill creating a
Department of Homeland Security, drug company lobbyists got language
inserted that shields the Eli Lilly Co. from massive damage awards. The
language, which survived Democrats' efforts to strip it from the bill,
also forces plaintiffs in these cases to pursue their claims in a
special federal "vaccine court" before suing in the state or federal
courts.
The new language will affect all those pending lawsuits, delaying
them by a year or more. It will also leave an unknown number of autistic
children with no legal remedy, according to Kathleen Dailey, a partner
in the Portland law firm Williams, Dailey, O'Leary, Craine and Love,
which is representing several families in the Thimerosal suits.
Because the vaccine court hears only claims filed within three
years after a child first exhibits symptoms, children who developed
autism more than three years before their cases come before the court
will be left with no legal recourse, Dailey said. "Our position is,
that's unconstitutional."
At least one U.S. senator has promised to introduce a bill in
January that would strike the Thimerosal-related language from the
Homeland Security Act.
'We're entitled'
Tory Mead of Portland, whose 4-year-old son William is a
plaintiff in a separate Thimerosal lawsuit, said she was appalled that
drug company lobbying was allowed to affect pending litigation.
"Even if you don't like what we're saying, we're entitled to have
our day in court," Mead said. "We have had two federal judges who have
said the state courts are where these cases belong."
The new language extends the Eli Lilly Co. protection under the
1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. That act says
that claims from children who suffer serious side effects from vaccines
must be heard first in a vaccine court. It allows children to receive
compensation without having to prove that the vaccine caused their
injury, but it caps damage awards. It also provides a buffer against
litigation for manufacturers of the vaccines and the physicians who
administer them.
Lawyers in the Thimerosal cases have argued that their cases
don't belong in the vaccine court because the injuries they allege were
caused by the preservative, not the vaccine itself.
The new language does away with that distinction, rendering that
argument moot.
"Eli Lilly will get the protection of the vaccine act," Dailey
said. "It means we cannot pursue them as a defendant."
The vaccine court caps damages in vaccine-related deaths at
$250,000. Awards to injured children have averaged about $825,000. In
their civil suit, in contrast, George and Tory Mead are seeking $13
million for their son William's lifelong care.
Without the protection the new language provides, Eli Lilly's
exposure could run into the billions if the lawsuits win certification
as class actions. Company records obtained by a Dallas, Texas, law firm
during discovery indicated that Eli Lilly officials were concerned about
the potential toxicity of Thimerosal as early as the 1930s.
In a Nov. 18 letter to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, Carl
Feldbaum, president of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, a drug
lobby, argued for extending protection to companies involved in making
all components of childhood vaccines. "It is simply inconceivable that
Congress intended anything other than for a vaccine to be considered a
sum of its parts -- but several class action lawsuits suggest
otherwise," he wrote.
Lilly 'bought Congress'
U.S. drug companies are "well positioned" to develop new vaccines
to combat biological attacks by terrorists, Feldbaum wrote. But he
added, "Without adequate liability protection, it will be infeasible for
many of our companies to be a source of anti-terrorism technology."
Former Eli Lilly officials hold key posts in the Bush
administration.
Mitch Daniels, a former Eli Lilly vice president, now serves as
director of the Office of Management and Budget. Sidney Taurel, the
company's chairman, president and chief executive, serves on the
Homeland Security Advisory Council.
"Eli Lilly hired lobbyists and bought Congress," Dailey said.
"Now they are given immunity from lawsuits. I would say that I have not
seen justice done for these children yet."
|