WASHINGTON -- Even if Congress rescinds the vaccine
liability protections for Eli Lilly and Co. approved this week, those
who have already filed lawsuits would still have to start over,
according to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.
The Senate on Tuesday passed a homeland security bill
that included protections for companies that sold a mercury-based
preservative put in childhood vaccines. But moderate Republicans, who
opposed the provision, said they had secured a promise from the White
House and GOP leaders to revisit the issue in January. At the very
least, the lawmakers said, they would make sure the protection does not
extend to lawsuits that have already been filed.
Eli Lilly is facing trial next year in the first of more
than 45 vaccine-related lawsuits filed against the drugmaker.
But because the homeland security bill will become law
before Congress returns in January, all lawsuits will be terminated,
according to Daschle, who opposed the provision. "All of that casework,
all of those people exposed will lose access to the courts," he said.
"They'll have to start all over again."
Jerrold S. Parker, a New York lawyer whose firm is
representing about 1,000 families making claims, said the judge in each
case could have a different reaction to the congressional action.
"The real problem is we just don't know," Parker said.
"We might be able to convince some judges to hold off on dismissing the
case, but we just don't know how it's going to be handled."
Parker said if Congress doesn't change the liability
protection for pending suits, litigants will challenge the retroactivity
as unconstitutional.
The bill that passed, which President Bush is expected
to sign into law, requires that families with complaints about vaccine
preservatives and additives must first seek remedies through a federal
program set up to deal with other vaccine injuries. Only if a family is
unhappy with that outcome, can the manufacturer be sued.
Democrats and a few Republicans complained that the
liability protection was slipped into a popular bill in the hopes of
rewarding an industry that raises lots of campaign contributions for
Republicans.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.