UPDATE: National societies unite against bioterror

Vaccination News Home Page

http://news.bmn.com/news/story?day=021108&story=1

 
Research
Tools
Reviews Journal
Collection
News &
Comment
Books &
Labware
Science
Jobs
Web
Links
news.bmn.com Latest
Updates
Today's
News
Magazine Conference
Reporter
Commentary Journal
Scan
Special
Report
My E-mail
Alerts
Section
Search
  My BMN My BMN Exit Exit  
  Send Feedback to BMN Feedback Help System Help  


 

Today's News
 Front Page
 News Archive
 Send us News Tips


 

Quick Site Search

 

Advanced site search


 

 


 

- 8 November 2002
Today's News Stories
News Archive
     
UPDATE: National societies unite against bioterror

7 November 2002 17:00 GMT

by Bea Perks

researcher in protective garmentsThe presidents of the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the UK's Royal Society have joined forces to remind researchers of their vital role in preventing worldwide distribution of potential bioweapon technology.

Bruce Alberts of the NAS and the Royal Society's Robert May, writing in tomorrow's edition of Science, urge researchers, whether in academia, government research facilities, or industry, to "take responsibility for helping to prevent the potential misuses of their work."

The article follows recommendations from the Royal Society for an international set of guidelines to regulate research in sensitive areas, and is timed to coincide with the next meeting of signatories to the 1972 Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention, to be held in Geneva from the 11th to the 22nd of November.

"This month's meeting reminds us that our nations' best scientists must support policy makers in their efforts to make progress toward measures that will counteract the threat from advances in weapons technology," write Alberts and May.

There has been a massive increase in funding for research into combating the threat of bioterrorism since September 11, 2001, they note, but there is also a need for increased understanding of the spread of potential bioweaponry.

Governments must have access to leading scientists in different specialties, they stress, to define clear boundaries between "classified" and "unclassified" research. These boundaries must then be regulated internationally to fit in with the "truly international" nature of cutting-edge science.

Alberts and May acknowledge the difficulties in balancing security with scientific openness, a vital component of scientific research. Life scientists need to take responsibility for helping to prevent misuse of their research, they conclude, "while being careful to preserve the vitality of their disciplines as required to contribute to human welfare."


 
 
Send us your comments for publication.
 
 
Sign up for BioMedNet News weekly email alerts.


 

 





 

See also:
Therapeutic challenges posed by bacterial bioterrorism threats
[Review]
Peter H. Gilligan
Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2002, 5:5:489-495

Bioterrorism: responding to an emerging threat
[Opinion]
Margaret A. Hamburg
Trends in Biotechnology, 2002, 20:7:296-298

Bioterrorism: how well are we protected?
[Letters]  Vadim V. Demidov
Trends in Biotechnology, 2002, 20:5:192

New approaches and old problems in the shadow of bioterrorism
[Meeting report]
John M. Leong, Nikhat Parveen and Jon D. Goguen
Trends in Microbiology, 2002, 10:3:112-114
 




 
Today's News Stories
News Archive


BioMedNet
Home
News &
Comment
My BMN
 
Help System
 
Send Feedback to BMN
 
Information for Advertisers © Elsevier Science Limited 2002

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.