UN soldiers prove invaluable in war against malaria
14 November 2002 16:00 EST
by Edward Susman
Denver - Phase III studies of the anti-malarial compound
tafenoquine, tested on Australian soldiers assigned to United
Nations peacekeeping troops in East Timor, demonstrate the drug is
at least as effective as the controversial drug mefloquine,
researchers say. Next on the agenda: Figuring out exactly how the
drugs work.
The half-life of tafenoquine - about 14 days - makes it an
attractive candidate for prophylaxis against Plasmodium vivax,
said Peter Nasveld, a physician from the Australian Defence Force
in Canberra. Nasveld was among the contingent of troops patrolling
East Timor, and presented his report at the annual meeting of the
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene here.
The researchers assigned 462 soldiers to receive tafenoquine,
and 153 to receive mefloquine (also called Larium) in a
double-blind study. During the six-month tour of duty in East
Timor, where P. vivax is endemic, no soldier in either
group developed symptomatic malaria, the researchers found.
P. vivax affects about 100 million people worldwide,
particularly in southern Asia and the Americas. Although infection
can prove fatal, its course of illness is less severe than malaria
caused by P. falciparum.
On their return to Australia, soldiers in the mefloquine cohort
received primaquine, an 8-aminoquinoline compound, twice a day for
15 days. The tafenoquine patients were given placebo.
Five cases of malaria developed about four to five months later
among the troops - four of the tafenoquine group, and one in the
mefloquine/primaquine group - less than 1% in each group. All the
malaria cases were attributed to P. vivax.
"We were pretty happy with the results," said Nasveld, adding
side-effects were similar in both groups of patients. Tafenoquine
is being jointly developed by the US Army and GlaxoSmithKline.
In the meantime, other researchers are actively investigating
how the drugs block P. vivax infection, a puzzle that has
remained unsolved for more than 20 years.
"No one knows how 8-aminoquinolines manage to control P. vivax,"
said Bruce Russell, a postdoctoral fellow at the US Armed Forces
Research Institute of Medical Sciences, based in Bangkok,
Thailand.
"We believe that once the drugs becomes concentrated in the
liver cells, it prevents P. vivax from infecting patients,"
Russell said. Before going to work on the US Army project, Russell
was stationed in East Timor with Australian forces, and was given
experimental doses of tafenoquine in early testing of the drug.
Russell described methods of detecting and quantifying the
exo-erythrocytic stage of infection by the P. vivax
parasite, and observing the effects of both tafenoquine and
primaquine by infecting the human hepatocyte cell line (HC-04)
with Plasmodium sporozites.
"This work may give us the unique capability to sort out how
these drugs work," Russell said.
Once the genetic sequencing of P. vivax is completed, an
imminent event, Russell anticipates performing genetic microarray
screens of the infected hepatocytes before and after they are
challenged with tafenoquine or another drug in its class.
The differences in genetic patterns on the arrays could provide
clues to the pathways being used by the drugs, Russell suggested.
Picture caption:
Left: map of East Timor. Right: blood smear with developing P.
vivax, CDC/Dr. Mae Melvin.

|
Send us your
comments for
publication.
|
| Sign up for BioMedNet News weekly
email alerts. |