Previous research has also found the protein test to be a good measure of
risk. The new report, being published in the New England Journal of Medicine, is
considered the strongest evidence yet because the study was large, with 27,939
women, and tracked their health for eight years.
The researchers, led by Dr. Paul M. Ridker, director of the center for
cardiovascular disease prevention at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston,
found that women with high C-reactive protein were twice as likely to have a
heart attack or stroke as women with high cholesterol.
"This is very powerful and, I would even argue, overwhelming demonstration of
the fact that it's time to move beyond cholesterol if we're trying to prevent
this disease," Dr. Ridker said.
Other researchers had varying opinions, with some ready to embrace widespread
use of the test and others calling for more research.
C-reactive protein is a measure of inflammation, which in recent years has
become the focus of intense research in cardiology. Normally, it is the body's
way of protecting itself against injury and infection; it involves a cascade of
reactions by the immune system. But if inflammation becomes chronic or turns
against a person's own tissues, disease can result.
Many researchers think chronic inflammation plays a major part in artery
disease, heart attacks and strokes. Inflammation inside arteries is thought to
contribute to heart attacks and strokes by causing cholesterol deposits in the
artery walls to rupture and bleed. Blood clots then form, blocking the vessels
and cutting off the blood supply to portions of the heart or brain.
The test, for C-reactive protein, is available at many laboratories, but is
not in routine use. Experts from the American Heart Association and the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention expect to issue guidelines soon for using the
test, the heart association's president, Dr. Robert Bonow, said, adding that the
new report would influence the guidelines.
The subjects were 27,939 women, 45 and older, who were healthy and already
participating in a study that tracked the development of heart disease. The
women gave blood samples when they entered the study, and researchers followed
their health for an average of eight years. During that time, 571 women had
heart attacks, strokes, procedures to open blocked coronary arteries or death
from cardiovascular disease.
The researchers measured levels of C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol,
the so-called bad cholesterol, that were in blood taken at the beginning of the
study. Then, for each substance, they divided the study population into five
groups, ranging from the lowest to the highest levels.
Next, they counted the bad events in the various groups.
For LDL cholesterol, women with the highest levels were 1.5 times as likely
as those with the lowest levels to have cardiovascular problems.
For C-reactive protein, the risk was greater: women with high levels had 2.3
times the risk of women with low levels. And high C-reactive protein was more
dangerous than high LDL cholesterol: compared to high LDL cholesterol, high
levels of the protein were linked to about twice the risk of stroke, coronary
disease or cardiovascular death.
When the researchers analyzed C-reactive protein and LDL together, they found
that women with high levels of both substances had the highest risk. The group
with the next highest risk had high C-reactive protein and low LDL people who
might, on a standard exam, be given a clean bill of health based on their low
LDL.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"