Children with autism are not more likely than other children to have had a
stomach or bowel disorder before their diagnosis, according to an American
study.
The research, by academics from Boston University's Collaborative Drug
Surveillance Programme, also found no time link between vaccination for measles,
mumps or rubella and the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms.
The findings cast further doubt on the claimed link between the MMR vaccine
and autism.
Four years ago Dr Andrew Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital,
London, started the MMR controversy when they suggested a link between the
triple injection, bowel disease and autism in children.
The Boston researchers looked at 96 British children with autism and 449
without. Nine per cent of children in each group had a history of
gastrointestinal problems before the first sign of autism.
They say in the British Medical Journal: "No evidence was found that children
with autism were more likely to have had defined gastrointestinal disorders at
any time before their diagnosis with autism."
An analysis of blood-mercury levels in infants immunized with vaccines
containing a preservative with traces of the element showed the mercury was
cleared within a month and caused no developmental problems, scientists reported
yesterday.
Thimerosal a vaccine preservative that has been in use globally for more than
a half-century, had been at the core of a debate in this country about vaccine
safety.
In 1999, thimerosal, which contains ethyl-mercury, was banned from vaccine
production in the United States. It was removed as a precautionary measure to
cut down on exposure to mercury from all sources. However, it is still used in
the manufacture of vaccines abroad.
Dr. Michael Pichichero, a pediatrician and immunologist at the University of
Rochester, said he and his team studied 61 infants between 1999 and 2000 who had
received thimerosal-containing vaccines. While traces of mercury showed up in
initial blood tests, the element was completely cleared within 30 days.
"These results are very encouraging," Pichichero said. He added that the
investigation confirms a previous medical hypothesis that the amount of mercury
in the vaccines was far too low to cause harm.
Thimerosal was added to multi-dose vials of a variety of vaccines, explained
Dr. John Treanor, a University of Rochester vaccine expert and member of the
research team. The preservative helped maintain the potency of the doses by
preventing contamination from bacteria. "Contamination can be a problem because
someone uses these vials over and over," Treanor said.
Results of the study, which focused on children between the ages of two
months and six months, is reported in the British medical journal The Lancet.
Mercury concentrations and metabolism in infants receiving vaccines
containing thiomersal: a descriptive study Michael E Pichichero, Elsa
Cernichiari, Joseph Lopreiato, John Treanor
The mass media and alternative-medicine publications increasingly report that
exposure to and the build-up of mercury within the body is associated with
chronic ill-health, particularly conditions such as myalgic encephalitis. [Moi?
ed.]
Mercury is widespread in the environment; it is found naturally in rocks,
soils, and plants and as a contaminant in air, water, and food. The element is
used a lot in the electrical industry, and in many domestic products, including
paints, pesticides, fabric softeners, waxes, and polishes. Mercury is often used
as a preservative in vaccines, skin creams, cosmetics, and other medications.
Mercury is the major component of dental amalgams and there is a growing lobby
against its use.1 Everyone is exposed to small amounts of mercury as elemental
metallic vapour from dental amalgams or organic mercury from fish, sea foods,
and vaccines, or to inorganic salts from other food stuffs, water, and air.
Faecal excretion is the major route of elimination of inorganic or organic
mercury.
Elemental mercury from amalgams is lipid-soluble and freely passes through
cell membranes.2 By contrast, organic and inorganic mercury from the diet and
other sources are charged and must be complexed with other counter-ions or
low-molecular-weight sulphur compounds to pass through cell membranes. The major
targets in proteins susceptible to binding of metals, including mercury, are the
sulphydryl group of cysteine and the iminonitrogen of histidine. The aromatic
ring nitrogens of the nucleotide bases form mercury complexes, with thymine and
uracil being more reactive than cytosine, guanine, and adenine.3,4
The most abundant single nucleophile reactant is the antioxidant glutathione,
typically present at concentrations of 5 mmol/L in cells, serum, and bile.5
Glutathione mops up ionised mercury derived from oxidation of elemental mercury
and from organic and inorganic mercury. There may be an inverse relation between
the concentration of intracellular glutathione and mercury toxicity.6 Once bound
to glutathione, mercury can leave the cell and circulate freely in serum and
lymph from where it can be deposited in other organs and tissues. Glutathione-complexed
mercury is eventually eliminated via the kidney or downloaded via bile into the
intestinal lumen from where it is excreted in faeces. After mercury is released
from tissues, faecal excretion is the predominant route for elimination.
In this issue of The Lancet, Michael Pichichero and colleagues investigate
mercury levels and excretion in infants receiving vaccines containing thiomersal
(ethyl mercury). Little is known about the harmful effects of mercury in infants
and children and at what level these effects occur. At between 12·5 and 25 mg
mercury per vaccine dose, the infants may be receiving over 100 mg ethyl mercury
in the first 6 months of life. Pichichero and colleagues show that the levels in
blood are much lower than the prescribed limits and that much of the ethyl
mercury appears to be eliminated rapidly in faeces. This study gives comforting
reassurance about the safety of ethyl mercury as a preservative in childhood
vaccines. D C Henderson
* * *
Anti-Mercury Advocates Rebut New Thimerosal Study Conclusions Safe Minds and
Mercury Policy Project Statement on "Mercury concentrations and metabolism in
infants receiving vaccines containing mercury: a descriptive study"
E-Wire - According to Safe Minds and Mercury Policy Project, two anti-mercury
advocacy groups, few, if any, definitive conclusions can be drawn from this
latest thimerosal study.
An initial analysis of the Pichichero et al. study of blood mercury
concentrations in infants after vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines
clearly demonstrates that this is a poorly designed study, said Sallie Bernard,
president of Safe Minds.
Nevertheless, in the article and accompanying commentary, the authors make
the following sweeping statements:
1. "Overall, the results of this study show that amounts of mercury in the
blood of infants receiving vaccines formulated with thimersol are well below
concentrations potentially associated with toxic effects." 2. "Administration of
vaccines containing thimerosal does not seem to raise blood concentrations of
mercury above safe values in infants." 3. "This study gives comforting
reassurance about the safety of ethyl mercury as a preservative in childhood
vaccines."
This report looks very much like agenda research and not an unbiased study,
said Michael Bender of the Mercury Policy Project.
According to the groups, these statements cannot be supported by the study
design and results, for the following reasons.
1. The blood mercury concentrations found in the study are not necessarily
below the established safety limits: the authors cite a 1994 study by Grandjean
to provide a safety level for methylmercury of 29 ppb (parts per billion) and
state that this level is ten times lower than the mercury level needed to see a
decrease in cognitive performance in children. However, this comparison does not
utilize the latest safety data research. In 1998, Grandjean published an article
(Grandjean et al., "Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to
"safe" levels of methyl mercury", Environmental Research, 1998) in which he
rejected the conclusions of his earlier research and found performance declines
when the average cord blood mercury concentration was 59 ppb. His later study
was validated as the "gold standard" by the National Academy of Science in their
2000 report "Toxicological Effects of Methyl mercury" in which they found that
the lowest dose for which adverse neurological effects are found is when cord
blood is 58 ppb. In the Pichichero study, there was one infant out of 33
(3%) in which blood mercury was measured who has a mercury concentration of
20.55 ppb. This infant was exposed to 37.5 micrograms of mercury, and the blood
draw was taken on day 5. The authors state that the half-life of ethyl mercury
is probably about 6-7 days. Thus, this infant's peak mercury concentration would
be much higher than 20.55 ppb. Many infants in the 1990s were exposed to 62.5
micrograms of mercury at age 2 months, or nearly double what the study infant
received. Therefore, it is probable that the blood levels of some infants given
the full regimen of thimerosal vaccines in the 1990s would exceed the 58 ppb
threshold for adverse effects. Therefore, the results from the Pichichero study
can hardly be seen as "reassuring" to any parent.
2. Samples of blood were taken at various time points after exposure, but
each study subject only had one apparent blood draw. Standard study design for a
pharmacokinetic study, even a simple one, is to obtain multiple draws from each
subject. Otherwise, it is not possible to make definitive statements about
distribution, elimination, and half-life, which this study seems to do.
3. The reference point that they use to establish safety levels for
thimerosal is methyl mercury, a different compound than the ethyl mercury in
thimerosal. Simply because a compound is similar does not mean it is as safe. A
good example is thalidomide, a sedative drug that was prescribed to pregnant
women from 1957 into the early 60's. It was present in at least 46 countries
under different brand names. When taken during the first trimester of pregnancy,
Thalidomide prevented the proper growth of the foetus, resulting in horrific
birth defects in thousands of children around the world. The reason is the
Thalidomide molecule is chiral, with left and right-handed versions. The drug
that was marketed was a 50/50 mixture. One of the molecules was a sedative,
whereas the other was found later to cause foetal abnormalities. The tragedy
could have been avoided had the physiological properties of the individual
thalidomide [molecules] been tested prior to commercialization. Molecules that
look almost exactly alike can behave very differently. The FDA is very rigid
about testing the precise molecule being approved.
4. The conclusions are based on blood draws from 33 exposed children, which
is a small sample upon which to draw far-reaching conclusions. It is also a
convenience sample without random assignment of subjects and not even an attempt
to make sure that comparison groups were age-sex matched.
5. There was variability in the thimerosal doses given, and little attempt to
incorporate dose differences in the half-life model or safety assessment.
6. With a claimed half-life of 6-7 days, it is remiss that there is no
collection within 3 days of exposure, when peak mercury levels would be
obtained. It would be impossible to make any conclusions about safety without
these measures.
For these reasons alone, Safe Minds and the Mercury Policy Project believe
that the conclusions of this study should not be used in deliberations of
thimerosal safety. Rather, more and better research is needed.
For years, parents and teachers in Massachusetts have quietly compared notes
on the increasing number of children being diagnosed with autism, and the
increasing demand they will place on an already strained social service system.
This week, public health officials initiated the first statewide study of the
incidence of autism, a developmental disorder that can prevent children from
communicating or forming relationships. A similar study by the California
Department of Developmental Services reported a startling increase in the
disorder of 272 percent from 1987 to 1998, prompting urgent demands for state
services and stepped-up research.
Advocates hope the data will have a similar effect here.
"We couldn't go to the Legislature and say, `This is the scope of the
problem. We need funding,"' said Gail Kastorf, director of the Autism Support
Center in Danvers. "Anyone at [the Department of Mental Retardation] will say
they are being flooded. The school system is certainly flooded. Everybody's
talking about it, but we don't have those numbers." If the study supports the
increase that activists describe, it will venture into controversial territory.
Common scientific thinking holds that autism is predominantly caused by a
genetic defect, and specialists caution that the number of cases could be rising
because parents are more aware of the disorder and doctors diagnose it more
frequently.
Many parents, however, are convinced that their children's illnesses were
triggered by environmental influences, and that the rising number reflects
childrens' exposure to chemicals or vaccines.
Increasingly, educators and state officials have lined up behind parents'
groups in noting the sheer change in numbers - and warning that legislators must
acknowledge the growth when tailoring future state budgets. State services for a
person with autism can cost as much as $4 million over his or her lifetime,
according to a study published in 1988 in the journal Behavioral Interventions.
"There's no question that if you're looking for over the next several years,
you're talking about an issue that involves tens of millions of dollars," said
Representative William M. Straus, a Democrat from Mattapoisett, who pushed to
include the survey on the Department of Public Health's mandate for this year.
The stir that resulted from the California study this fall underlined how
little is known about the prevalence of autism. Early epidemiologists described
it as a rare disease, affecting 4 or 5 children in 10,000, but estimates have
crept steadily up and now range between 2 and 6 children per 1,000. The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, which studied the community of Brick
Township, N.J., reported an even higher rate there, of 6.7 children per 1,000.
In Massachusetts, anecdotal evidence suggests that there is a true rise in
numbers. Within certain communities, advocates describe clusters of babies born
with the disorder and school officials complain of the crippling cost of
providing educational plans. State officials, too, have watched autism cases
increase with their own eyes, said Larry Tummino, assistant commissioner for
field operations at the Department of Mental Retardation.
"It is our perception; it's been recognized nationally and internationally,"
said Tummino, whose agency serves about 4,000 citizens with autism. "I think
we're already acknowledging it" by participating in the DPH study.
The study, requested by legislators as part of DPH's budget last year, has
lost much of its original funding in a 40 percent cut to the agency's budget,
said Suzanne Condon, assistant commissioner of public health, who is overseeing
the study. Much of the census information will come from the Department of
Education, which will give researchers access to school health records, she
said.
When the data is ready, it could prompt a reorganization of state
responsibilities, which are now divided between school systems and the
Department of Mental Retardation, Tummino said. Other states have created
partnerships or separate agencies to deal with the manifold needs of families
whose children have developmental disorders.
For years, though, advocates asking for a head count got little response from
state or federal officials, said Jerry Silbert, parent of an autistic boy and
president of the Massachusetts chapter of the Autism Society of America. Silbert
believes that cases have increased "20- to 30-fold" in recent years and now
represent 1 percent of births.
New statistics on the gender of those with special needs reveal for the first
time that 64% are boys and 36% girls.
The gender gap is even wider in the most severe cases - those with formal
"statements" of need: 72% are boys and 28% girls.
The figures dwarf the gap of a few percentage points between boys' and girls'
exam performance which has caused so much consternation.
Experts say the reasons are unclear but that - controversially - a large
factor might be teachers' perceptions of what constitutes problematic behaviour.
Exclusions
A report published on Friday by the Audit Commission says children with
special educational needs are being turned away from schools because of worries
that they could affect their position in exam league tables.
Children with SEN account for almost nine-tenths of permanent exclusions from
primary schools and six-tenths of those from secondary schools.
Almost five times as many boys as girls are expelled from school.
The Audit Commission says early intervention can make a great difference, but
funding for this is "incoherent and piecemeal".
Girls outperform boys in tests throughout their schooling.
The special needs figures might tend to confirm anecdotal and research
evidence, but this is the first time that the annual official statistics for the
whole country have been broken down by gender.
One in five
Overall there were more than 1.5 million children defined as having special
educational needs (SEN) in mainstream primary and secondary schools.
That represented almost one in five of all pupils.
Of those, 961,784 were boys and 540,770 were girls.
The proportion of boys among the 88,000 children in designated special
schools was 68%.
The Audit Commission report laments the lack of information in England on the
type of need - although the Department for Education is working on a way to
cover this in the annual census from 2004.
In Wales and in Scotland the pattern of children who have statements of need
is much the same.
This is that girls and boys are more or less equally likely to have physical
disabilities, but boys are far more likely than girls to have specific learning
difficulties, autistic disorders or emotional or behavioural problems.
Medical reasons
An SEN expert in Cambridge University's faculty of education, Richard Byers,
said some forms of special need - notably autism - were diagnosed much more
often in boys than in girls.
More and more cases of autism were being identified, so more boys were said
to have SEN.
But there was a bigger, "greyer" aspect to the issue, especially where
children in mainstream schools were identified as having social, emotional or
behavioural difficulties - again, many more of them boys.
"It is much less likely that there is a underlying medical reason for that,"
he said.
And non-medical
"Lots of commentators feel that we identify one kind of social, emotional or
behavioural difficulty - florid demonstrations - which tend to be in boys more
often than girls."
It was controversial, he said, but it might be that "for all kinds of social
and cultural reasons" teachers perceived boys to be more problematic than girls.
So there was an over-identification of boys with SEN - and probably an
under-identification of girls' needs, which were more likely to involve
withdrawal or self-harm.
The Department for Education said there were likely to be a range of factors.
"Boys are medically more vulnerable during birth.
"There appears to be some evidence that professionals, including teachers,
are likely to identify boys as having SEN particularly in relation to behaviour."
More work needed
The department was "taking forward work on tackling boys' underachievement
which will help address some of the difficulties experienced by boys, including
those with SEN".
The editor of The Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, Lani
Florian, said the gender gap might be as high as 10 to one in the case of
emotional and behavioural problems.
People had put forward various theories, to do with genes and hormones, for
instance - but none had been conclusive.
"It has been said that the classroom is just a more friendly environment for
girls - but that's just a theory too," Dr Florian said.
"We really don't know."
* * *
B.C. to Appeal Ruling On Funding Autism Treatment to Supreme Court
Victoria - The B.C. government is taking a dispute over funding treatment for
children with autism all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The government will ask the court for permission to appeal a B.C. Appeal
Court ruling that said the province is obligated to provide the children with
special treatment.
The government says the dispute is not over funding itself, but over how the
government decides to pay for and deliver health care and social programs.
It says the B.C. court ruling is an intrusion into government policy-making
because it affects the government's ability to decide which services it will pay
for.
The government also says it is providing funds to treat children with autism
and the number of children getting early intervention therapy has increased from
75 to more than 500 in the past year.
The B.C. Court of Appeal upheld a previous ruling that declared the
government had violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by not providing
funds for specialized care.
The original lawsuit was brought by four families with autistic children who
want the Lovaas treatment used.
The Justice Department asked a federal judge this week to seal documents that
might otherwise aid parents in lawsuits against the maker of a mercury-based
vaccine preservative called thimerosal, which the parents claim caused their
children's autism. The department has the right to make the request, but if the
court grants it, parents could be prevented from getting evidence that might
prove their claims. The court should refuse.
Courts occupy a borderland between the private and the public. In resolving
disputes, they gain control of information that litigants wish to keep private.
Some of this information deserves privacy, like trade secrets or details of a
divorce. But information that alerts the public to danger or that might help
prove responsibility for injuries should be publicly available once it is filed
in court.
Similarly, a judge should not suppress information that enables the public to
evaluate the performance of the courts, government officials, the electoral
process and powerful private organizations. A federal appeals court was correct
to unseal a letter that prosecutors had submitted to a trial judge last May in
support of a lenient sentence for a political contributor who had aided their
investigation of Senator Robert G. Torricelli of New Jersey. The letter, which
contained evidence supporting the contributor's claims that he had given Mr.
Torricelli thousands of dollars in cash and gifts, was initially sealed at the
request of the prosecutors and the senator, who was seeking a second term.
Within days after the court unsealed the letter, Mr. Torricelli was forced to
withdraw from the race.
This is how things are supposed to work. In 1978, the Supreme Court noted
that it was "clear that the courts of this country recognize a general right to
inspect and copy . . . judicial records and documents." Yet judges often seal
records and order litigants to conceal what they may have learned in discovery
before trial. By doing so, judges give the parties protection from public
scrutiny that they could not get at a trial in open court. This benefits
defendants by shielding possible misconduct. Plaintiffs benefit, too, because
the prospect of court-imposed secrecy makes it more likely that defendants will
offer more generous settlements. And courts benefit because cases are resolved
more quickly.
Of course, the public pays for secrecy by losing the information that the
trial would have revealed. Worse, even the request for sealing documents occurs
in secret.
There is evidence that court-ordered secrecy is increasing, especially in
defective products cases. A study in Dallas County, Tex., found that between
1920 and 1980, only 80 cases had sealed records. Between 1980 and 1987, the
study found 200 sealed cases.
Not all judges comply with the wishes of the litigants. This week, Constance
M. Sweeney, a state judge in Massachusetts, rejected the Boston archdiocese's
motion to suppress 11,000 documents concerning the church's responses when
priests were accused of sexually abusing children. The archdiocese had been
ordered to give the documents to a lawyer representing four men suing the
church, but it wished to keep them from public view while it sought to have the
case thrown out. But Judge Sweeney properly refused to hide documents that
contained information about a scandal involving serious harm and a powerful
institution.
Defenders of court-imposed secrecy argue that it encourages settlements and
avoids the costs of a trial. Some even argue that the courts' only job in
private disputes is to help the parties resolve their differences and that the
public interest enters the equation hardly at all. But when, as with thimerosal,
a court is asked to suppress information that might help vindicate legal claims,
or that reveals a continuing public danger or unethical behavior by powerful
people or institutions, secrecy is intolerable. The harm is made worse when a
judge, a public official, is asked to use public power to inflict it.
Stephen Gillers, vice dean of New York University School of Law, teaches
legal ethics.
* * *
LETTERS
Sad We're Angry Over Mercury
I am very sad to hear all the anger directed at the vaccine/mercury issues. I
too was in that state but soon learned this would not help my son. My anger was
zapping what little energy I had to work with my son.
At this same time my friend whose son had a bad reaction to DPT was diagnosed
autistic. She always blamed the shot.
But now her two younger sons have been diagnosed also.
They have not received one vaccination and she had natural childbirth.
I did not vaccinate my younger son and he is 2.5 years old with few words we
are starting ABA.
I also found Dr. Goldberg who believes all of this is barking up the wrong
tree and not going to get us anywhere (fighting the vaccination/mercury issue),
he believes, and has lots of peer-reviewed research papers to back this up (see
neuroimmunedr.com and nids.net) that it all starts with a break down with the
immune system then all kinds of things become problems, the vaccinations, the
mercury, foods, allergens, toxins, etc.
We can drive ourselves crazy looking at all the triggers and trying to fight
each one (ex: new carpeting) but the main cause is not being addressed, the
immune system break down.
When their immune systems heal, their own bodies will take care of the
metals, viruses, yeast, allergies, etc. and then they won't need medicines.
What causes the immune system to break down? This we don't know.
For every person it could be something different.
Some theories are we are being exposed to much more environmental toxins then
the body was ever intended to handle, some think the ozone layer might have
something to do with it.
We may never find the cause but we can treat the symptoms so lets all jump on
the same wagon and get this nightmare over.
- Jerri Gann
[EDITOR: Not worrying about the source of the assault, in favor of treating
the weakened/battered immune system is akin to not looking to see who is
shooting at you, while instead taking good care of the bullet wounds. The "main
cause" is not about our bodies being too genetically weak to withstand all the
speeding bullets in the environment, I would suggest. Better to duck and avoid
the hospital altogether. And when appropriate, shoot back.
Dr. Goldberg believes that the herpes virus or other viruses trigger autism
and other immune disorders. There is some research in support of this theory.
His unpublished treatment protocols avoid the use of any supplements in favor of
prescription medication.
We welcome the opportunity to reprint any recent peer-reviewed papers Dr.
Goldberg may have published on these subjects. -LS]
I would appreciate it if you would take into consideration the lost children
of America. I have read your "No Child Left Behind" and thank you for your call
not to leave any child behind, and I support you in this cause 100%.
But I must ask you, what are you, my government, thinking when you call for
vaccine manufactures to be lawfully exempt from possible damages caused to
children from the products they manufacture? What do you mean to accomplish by
asking the courts to seal their vaccine records? Is it so the public can not use
and access the notable information formed against these manufacturers for future
cases against them?
Why are you not waiting for the results of scientific research to answer the
question "Do vaccines, in anyway cause are aid in the on set of autism spectrum
disorders and other disabilities?" Or, do you and your colleges know the answer
already, and are trying to cut loses before hand at the expense of these
children and their families? If the vaccines have indeed caused or aided to the
onset of any disabilities, do these children and families deserve any type of
compensation from the manufacturer or government?
Mr. President, please ask yourself these questions. Are children with Autism
Spectrum Disorder's American? Do they disserve our consideration, understanding,
aid and compassion to the injuries that may or may not have been done to them
through the injections of the vaccinations? Do these children need, deserve and
demand equal protection under the law? Mr. President, are you not leaving these
children behind?
- Vivian Haug
>>>>> CONGRESSMAN DAN BURTON IS CALLING ON THE PRESIDENT <<<<<
TO HAVE A WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON AUTISM. YOU
CAN SUPPORT REP. BURTON BY SENDING YOUR LETTER
URGING HIM TO DO SO AS WELL:
President George W. Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
EMAIL: President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov
(Make sure you send a copy of your letter to us: edit@doitnow.com)
* * *
Readers' Posts
Did anyone else see the Hannity and Colmes broadcast with Rep. J C Watts from
Okla? His reference to impending lawsuits against pharmeceutical companies as
being frivolous angered me immensely. I cannot be the only one that feels this
way. Terri & Larry jrichmadison@alltel.net
******
Does anyone know how to join the lawsuit against Eli Lilly & Company on
behalf of their thimerosal damaged child? roxannespring@earthlink.net
******
Dr. Yazbak was interviewed on Tuesday, November 26 on "The Point" with Mindy
Todd on WCAI 90.1 FM and WNAN 91.1 FM, the NPR stations for Cape Cod and the
Islands. Unfortunately, part of the webcast could not be received worldwide. The
whole show will be rebroadcast on Saturday November 30, at 7 am Eastern. on
www.cainan.org
Dr. Yazbak described in detail the extent of the autism epidemic and commented
on its causes. Rick Rollens, well-known autism advocate, called the show and
updated the audience on the California research. The latest epidemiological
study from Denmark was also discussed.
******
William Stillman, author of the newly-published book, "Demystifying the
Autistic Experience," wishes to thank those individuals who so bravely and
graciously shared their stories about their loved ones possessed of spiritual,
multi-sensory capacities in response to my first post. I am still soliciting
anecdotes about persons with autism and clairvoyance, premonition, and communion
with spiritual entities and angels for my next book. Anonymity and discretion
assured if desired. Please respond to: Billstillman2@aol.com
******
You parents should get Michael Moore (Awful Truth) on your side, take many of
your children, and the press, to the President. Active Advocate Father of 6 year
old ASD son in Austarlia. richardblack@austarnet.com.au
******
We have video's available of the Oct. 12th conference, with Dr.'s Singh and
Shaw! Dr. Singh delivered his amazing research and is in desperate need for
funding, so please spread the word. There are two tapes, one for each doctor and
are $35 for the set ($20 each). Please mail payment to Casi's Quest: PO Box
293144 Davie, FL 33329, pay online thru paypal or call us at 800-939-TAAP
(8227)/ 954-583-4860 (Locally). April
******
>> FREE (Almost) READERS' POSTS <<
For Individuals, organizations, non-commercial and
commercial. Limit your posting to no more than 60
words please. There is no charge for this service,
but posters are obligated to thank all those who take
the time to answer your ads. This is a consideration
for others with autism after you and yours, who seek
assistance from appreciated readers. Send submissions to:
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"