Review: Lactobacillus is safe and
effective for treating children with acute infectious diarrhea
ACP Journal Club. 2002 Nov-Dec;137:96.
Van Niel CW, Feudtner C, Garrison MM,
Christakis DA. Lactobacillus therapy for acute infectious diarrhea
in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109:678-84. [PubMed
ID: 11927715]
Question
In children with acute infectious diarrhea (ID), is
treatment with Lactobacillus safe and effective for improving
clinical outcomes?
Data sources
Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE/Excerpta
Medica, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, DARE, and CINAHL from 1966
to 2000, and AMED, MANTIS, the Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Citation Index, and AltHealthWatch from 1985 to 2000. Search terms used were
diarrhea, gastroenteritis, or rotavirus combined with competitive
inhibition, Lactobacillus, probiotic, yogurt, or yoghurt.
Bibliographies of relevant papers were scanned, and key investigators were
contacted.
Study selection
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected if they
involved Lactobacillus treatment of ID in children, clinical outcomes
were reported, the treatment group received Lactobacillus and the
control group received a suitable placebo, the Lactobacillus and
control groups were indistinguishable, and data assessors were blinded to
participant treatment group. Studies in which patients had recently received
antibiotics were excluded.
Data extraction
Data were extracted on study and participant
characteristics, strain of Lactobacillus, definition of diarrhea,
infectious pathogens, adverse effects, and such outcomes as duration and
frequency of diarrhea.
Main results
26 studies were identified, and 9 studies were included. 8
studies involved only hospitalized children. In all 9 studies, children
received at least oral rehydration solution in addition to Lactobacillus
or control. Meta-analysis showed that children who received Lactobacillus
had a shorter duration (mean reduction 0.7 d, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.2 d; 7
studies) and less frequent diarrhea on day 2 (mean reduction in number of
stools 1.6/d, CI 0.7 to 2.6/d; 3 studies) than did those who received a
control intervention. Subgroup analyses showed that Lactobacillus
reduced the duration of diarrhea more than did control interventions in 5
studies done in developed countries (mean reduction 0.8 d, CI 0.1 to 1.5 d),
in 6 studies that used only live Lactobacillus preparations (mean
reduction 0.8 d, CI 0.3 to 1.3 d), and in studies that included children
with ID of all causes (not just rotavirus) (mean reduction 0.5 d, CI 0.1 to
1.0 d). Adverse reactions consistent with signs and symptoms of ID were
generally similar in children who received Lactobacillus and those
who received a control intervention.
Conclusion
In children with acute infectious diarrhea, treatment with
Lactobacillus is safe and effective for reducing the duration and
frequency of diarrhea.

Source of funding: Agency for Health Care Research and
Quality.
For correspondence: Dr. C.W. Van Niel, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. E-mail
cvanniel@u.washington.edu.

Commentary
The use of probiotics is well-accepted. Although the exact
mechanism by which this treatment accelerates recovery from infectious
diarrhea is not known, its use is medically sound. In this meta-analysis by
Van Niel and colleagues, treatment with Lactobacillus is effective
for accelerating the recovery from infectious diarrhea. The effect size was
a decreased duration of diarrhea of 0.7 days and a reduction of 1.6 stools
on day 2 of treatment.
Because the estimates of the effect of Lactobacillus
therapy are statistically significant, should we use Lactobacillus
regularly in treating gastroenteritis in children? Several considerations
should be made before accepting a universal recommendation based on the
results of this meta-analysis. It is important to note that different types
of lactobacilli may have different effect sizes. Furthermore, Van Niel and
colleagues combined the results of Lactobacillus GG, L. reuteri,
L. acidophilus, and L. bulgaricus, which may not be
appropriate. Marked differences exist in the amounts of bacteria given to
patients in different trials, in the different preparations of
Lactobacillus, and in the amounts that are commercially available in
different food products. In this meta-analysis, a clear dose-response
relationship was found. Thus, in practice, doses should contain
1010 colony-forming units of
Lactobacillus and be given
2 times daily.
Van Niel and colleagues concluded that Lactobacillus
is safe when given to children with diarrhea. However, only 391 patients
were exposed to Lactobacillus in the studies included in this
meta-analysis. In the elderly, individual cases of serious infections caused
by Lactobacillus have been reported
(1). I would agree with Van Niel and
colleagues that the studies available so far are encouraging, but more data
are needed before a universal recommendation of the use of Lactobacillus
can be made.
Matti Uhari, MD, PhD
University of Oulu
Oulu, Finland

References
1. Rautio M, Jousimies-Somer
H, Kauma H, et al. Liver abscess due to a Lactobacillus rhamnosus
strain indistinguishable from L. rhamnosus strain GG. Clin Infect
Dis. 1999;28:1159-60. [PubMed
ID: 10452653]
Copyright ©2002 American College of Physicians American Society of
Internal Medicine. The information contained herein should never be used as
a substitute for good clinical judgment.