PROPOSED FEDERAL GUIDANCE THREATENS PATIENT ACCESS TO MEDICATION
(St. Paul, Minnesota) - Federal officials have published a proposal to place
the pharmaceutical industry under ongoing federal scrutiny.
December 2, 2002 is the last day for the public to comment on the proposal.
In public comments sent to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) today,
Citizens' Council on Health Care (CCHC), a Minnesota-based health care policy
organization, expresses concern that the proposal will lead to higher costs and
reduced access to medication. Specific concerns include:
* fewer free drug samples
* tracking the activities of sales representatives
* costs of compliance shifted to consumers and patients
* diversion of funds from new drug research
* disincentives for charitable distribution of medication
* government-imposed price controls
* micromanagement of private industry
* intrusive oversight
"Suggesting that use of sales reps and distribution of free drug samples at
doctor's offices could constitute health care fraud will undoubtedly lead to
fewer free drug samples for those who depend on them," says Twila Brase,
president of CCHC.
Brase says that Medicare recipients without drug coverage, the poor, and the
insured with restrictive drug formularies who depend on free samples to meet
their medication needs will be faced with less access and higher costs.
Brase also reminds federal officials about the impact of federal control over
physician practices.
"Because of federal micromanagement and poor reimbursement, physicians are
dropping Medicare participation in droves. We expect that drug companies will
follow in their steps if the federal government decides to micromanage the
pharmaceutical industry."
The Draft OIG Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
was published in the Federal Register on October 3, 2002. The OIG clarifies that
the compliance with the guidance is voluntary but cautions the pharmaceutical
industry that lack of compliance could lead to federal investigation and
prosecution. In the last several years, guidances have been written for various
other sectors of the health care industry.
"Medications are taking the place of hospitalizations, decreasing health care
costs, and allowing patients to live longer, live better, and live at home. In
an effort to cut costs to the Medicare programs, the guidance threatens the
industry that is very important to patients. The public should be very worried,"
says Brase.
Deadline for public comments: 5 p.m. on Monday, December 2, 2002.
-----------------------------------------
SEND TO:
Office of Inspector General
Department of Health and Human Services
Attn: OIB-8-CPG
Room 5246, Cohen Building
330 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20201
RE: OIGB - 8 - CPG
-----------------------------------------
CCHC's public comments are available on their web site:
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"