"Will to live appeared to be a partial mediator," Dr. Levy said, "but it
didn't completely explain why the people with positive views lived longer. So
there must be other things involved. One likely candidate is how people respond
to stress. Older people with a negative view of aging show higher levels of
stress."
Dr. Friedman questioned whether something as simple as will to live could
explain the difference in longevity. Longevity, he said, is affected by a
variety of health behaviors that people practice throughout life. For many
years, Dr. Friedman has observed the health and longevity of a group of subjects
who were originally recruited in 1921 for the studies of psychology and
intelligence conducted by Dr. Lewis Terman of Stanford. Over the decades, these
subjects periodically answered extensive psychological questionnaires.
After examining their profiles, and checking to see how long the subjects
lived, Dr. Friedman found one general characteristic of childhood personality to
be associated with longevity, and that was what he called "conscientiousness."
"It's basically a kind of prudence and care," Dr. Friedman said.
Conscientious people are generally competent, truthful and responsible, and they
tend to lead stable, productive lives.
"My own studies suggest that certain people engage in a whole host of healthy
or unhealthy behaviors and situations cooperating with medical treatment,
wearing seat belts, avoiding drug abuse, staying active, associating with
healthier and more stable people, and more," Dr. Friedman said. "Together, these
can have a big impact on mortality risk across time."
Cheerfulness, on the other hand, was not related to longevity among the
people Dr. Friedman studied. In fact, this trait was linked to
shorter-than-average life span, he found.
"If you are sociable and carefree, you may have lower levels of stress
hormones and more friends to assist you, which is healthy," he said, "but you
may also wind up with excessive drinking, smoking and partying, which is
unhealthy over the long term. So we need to see how the psychology is playing
out in terms of one's own particular life path."
Optimism itself may not always be a healthy trait. In old age, pessimism may
be more protective, according to a study of older people last year by Dr. Derek
M. Isaacowitz, a psychologist now at Brandeis University.
When faced with the death of a friend or family member or some other negative
life event, Dr. Isaacowitz said, the older pessimists were less likely than the
optimists to suffer from depression. Perhaps, Dr. Isaacowitz concluded, the
pessimists at this age were better able to accept life's realities.
"It's important that optimism not be footless and unwarranted," said Dr.
Martin E. P. Seligman, a psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania who was
a co-author of the study.
Cantankerousness, on the other hand, has been found to be a protective
characteristic among the elderly. In a study of residents of homes for the
elderly conducted in the 1970's, Dr. Morton A. Lieberman, a psychologist now at
the University of California at San Francisco, found that those who were ornery
and argumentative with the nursing home staff members lived longer than those
who were not.
"I'm not sure it was because they got more attention," Dr. Lieberman said,
"because the staff found them so difficult. What caused them to live longer,
what the biology is, we don't know."
Most experts agree that the connections between personality and life span are
not simple.
"It's bad advice to tell people to cheer up and you'll live longer," Dr.
Friedman said. "There's very little evidence to show that's true. We should be
beyond the point where we think it's just mind over body."
Many psychologists question whether it is even possible for people to change
their personalities and thus improve their survival. "Personality is stable,"
Dr. Maruta of Mayo Clinic said. "There might be fluctuations now and then, but
I'm not sure we can really change."
Dr. Seligman said it might be possible at least to train people to adapt a
somewhat more optimistic outlook. Each year, at the University of Pennsylvania,
he recruits a group of freshmen to receive "optimism training," intended to help
them cope with the stress of adjustment to college life. And has found that the
students who receive the training suffer fewer illnesses throughout college than
those who do not.
Dr. Seligman's books including "Learned Optimism" (1991), "What You Can
Change . . . and What You Can't" (1993) and most recently, "Authentic Happiness"
(2002) teach that it is possible at least to shift one's way of explaining
life events toward the positive.
But he is no more inclined than any other experts to say that people can
simply cheer up and live longer. "It is entirely possible that some third
variable like your genes both makes you happy and gives you longer life," Dr.
Seligman said.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"