Natural or synthetic secretin does not reduce symptoms of
autism, study shows
Secretin, touted as a possible cure for autism just three years ago, is not a
magic bullet that relieves the symptoms of the developmental disorder, report
researchers at the University of Washington and the University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center. Their study, which involved the largest and
most-comprehensive trials of the hormone yet conducted, is published in the
November issue of Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent
Psychiatry.
"The message to parents is that there is no evidence that secretin is
effective and should be given to children with autism," said Geraldine Dawson,
director of the UW's Autism Center, who co-led the study. "We have yet to find a
medicine that cures autism, and the results really underscore why research for
the cause of autism is necessary."
The study is believed to be the first to measure the effectiveness of both
natural porcine secretin and a synthetic form of the hormone and a placebo.
Secretin is a naturally occurring human hormone produced in the small intestine
that helps control digestion and is used in diagnosing gastrointestinal
problems.
Autism is a disorder that interferes with a child's ability to communicate
and relate socially with other people. Afflicted individuals also can have a
restricted range of activities and interests, and about 75 percent of children
with autism also have some form of mental retardation. The disorder is far more
common than previously thought, affecting more than half a million Americans.
The researchers found that neither form of secretin reduced the symptoms of
autism beyond the effects noted for the placebo.
"With autism we know there is a very large placebo effect, so you have to
show a bigger effect to say a treatment worked," said Dawson. "We don't fully
understand the mystery of the placebo effect in medicine. But the expectancy
that a treatment will work can have a real positive impact. It is not an
imagined effect, but real change because of the expectancy of some possible
change." In the study, 85 children diagnosed with autism and ranging in age from
3 to 12 were each given a single intravenous injection of one type of secretin
or a placebo in randomized, double-blind trials.
The children were evaluated on a number of factors, including language,
social functioning and behavior problems by parents, teachers and researchers
one week before receiving the injection and again four weeks after being
injected. None of those doing the evaluations knew what type of injection each
child received. Parents were asked about their child's behavioral and sleep
problems and their vocabulary, while teachers were primarily asked about
behavior problems. In laboratories, investigators rated and diagnosed the
children in a play-based interaction that tested social and communication
functioning. The children also were given a vocabulary test.
In addition, the researchers compared children with and without
gastrointestinal problems, common symptoms for many people with autism. The
initial report claiming benefits from secretin in the late 1990s came from a
study in which the hormone was used in diagnosing a child's gastrointestinal
problems. Again, Dawson said, the new study showed there was no response beyond
that shown from the placebo.
"Secretin is not a magic bullet," she said. "When parents first heard about
the initial reports some were paying huge sums of money for secretin treatment.
The National Institutes of Health decided to commission this study in response
to a high visibility case where parents were using a treatment that had not been
assessed. The available evidence suggests there is no role for secretin.
"There is still a possibility that repeated doses of secretin might have an
effect. But we think parents should use treatments that we know are effective,
such as behavioral interventions and, in some cases, drugs to treat associated
symptoms such as attention problems and hyperactivity that affect many children
with autism."
Other members of the research team included Dr. Alan Unis, a former UW
professor of psychiatry and behavior science; Jeff Munson, a research scientist
in the UW's autism research program; Julie Osterling, clinical director of the
UW's Autism Center; Robert Abbott, UW professor of educational psychology; Dr.
Ed Goldson, professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center; Sally Rogers, professor of psychiatry at the Colorado center
and JFK Partners; and Robin Gabriels, a psychologist at the Colorado center and
JFK Partners.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"