Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/444799?WebLogicSession=Pe5XuGkHJftkC6V3K74xossUix71VG28aVp2CcwVQM8fF4Pk8q1Y|8856772525837874264/184161392/6/7001/7001/7002/7002/7001/-1

Long QT Syndrome Linked to SIDS



 

By Martha Kerr

CHICAGO (Reuters Health) Nov 19 - Approximately 5% of SIDS cases are the result of long QT syndrome, according to research presented here Tuesday morning at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2002.

There has been speculation that some cases of SIDS may be the result of fatal arrhythmias. Dr. Michael J. Ackerman of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and colleagues, tracked all SIDS cases reported in Arkansas between September 1997 and August 1999. They extracted DNA from tissue obtained from the 93 cases found, looking for evidence of mutations in five genes known to be linked with long QT syndrome.

The investigators found missense mutations in one of the five genes in 27 infants. In four infants (5%), "there was strong evidence of cardiac channelopathy," Dr. Ackerman reported. No evidence of these channel mutations was found in a group of more than 200 healthy controls.

"This 5% could not be due to chance," he commented. "There is a recurrence rate in SIDS, but not like you would see in a hereditary condition such as long QT syndrome, which is an autosomal dominant trait."

Dr. Ackerman pointed out that long QT syndrome is "highly treatable" with beta-blockers or implantable defibrillators, which could potentially be adapted for use in infants.

"Now we can start thinking about neonatal screening," Dr. Ackerman told Reuters Health. A prevalence of 5% translates to approximately 7 SIDS deaths per 1000 per year, or around 2 to 3 times more prevalent than childhood leukemia, he noted.

"We routinely screen for diseases with a prevalence of 1 in 100,000," he pointed out. "A simple 12-lead electrocardiogram could detect long QT syndrome, but we are not to the point where we can recommend that."

These study results should not be used to make screening recommendations, he said "Ultimately, that decision will likely be made less by scientists than by public opinion."

 

Related Links


 

   

Reuters Health Information 2002. © 2002 Reuters Ltd.
Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



 

 


 


 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.