Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.heapol.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/384

OUP Health Policy and Planning
 

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Similar articles found in:
Health Policy and Planning Online
Search Medline for articles by:
Liu, T.-C. || Chen, L.-M.
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager

Health Policy and Planning; 17(4): 384-392
© Oxford University Press 2002

 

The impact of National Health Insurance on neonatal care use and childhood vaccination in Taiwan

Tsai-Ching Liu1, Chin-Shyan Chen2 and Li-Mei Chen3

1 Department of Public Finance,
2 Department of Economics, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan and
3 Department of Public Health, Fu-Jen Catholic University, Taipei county, Taiwan

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of National Health Insurance (NHI) on the utilization of neonatal care and childhood vaccination in Taiwan. Data are selected from two nationwide maternal and infant surveys undertaken in 1989 and 1996, which were funded by the Department of Health. The questionnaire was administered in all 23 administrative districts, including two metropolitan areas – the cities of Taipei and Kaohsiung. The first and second cohort consisted of 1641 and 3499 infants, respectively. This study used a bivariate probit estimation procedure to examine the factors that determine the probability of neonatal care use and vaccination by pooling the 2 years. Generally, the mothers who are older, more educated and more satisfied with birth delivery services were found to be more likely to use neonatal preventive care. The likelihood of receiving such care also tends to rise with advancing gestational age and higher probability of neonatal complication (icterus neonatorum) and being born in a hospital. The likelihood of care was also found to vary regionally with northern neonates having higher odds of receiving preventive care than non-northern neonates. In spite of having an insignificant impact on the use of care, NHI does lessen the inequality in use of these two services in various regions. However, regional variations in neonatal care use still exist. Residents of the southern area remain less likely to receive neonatal care than those of the northern area after NHI. This finding deserves serious consideration when attempting to design effective policies, such as expanding medical institutions in the aboriginal southern areas so as to increase the accessibility of such health care.





 

 


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright © 2002 Oxford University Press.

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.