Herd Effect Shown for Hepatitis A, Pneumococcal Vaccines
Laurie Barclay, MD
Oct. 28, 2002 At the Infectious Disease Society of America (ISDA) annual
meeting held in Chicago, Illinois, from Oct. 24 to 27, investigators from Israel
reported on their experience with instituting hepatitis A virus (HAV)
vaccination in toddlers. They found a more than 90% reduction in disease not
only among the two- to four-year-olds, but in all age groups. This finding, most
likely reflecting herd immunity, suggests that catch-up vaccination is not
necessary.
"National anti-HAV immunization program aimed exclusively at toddlers
resulted in abrupt disease reduction of >90%, not only among vaccine recipients,
but also among all other age groups, by achieving high-level immunity in 2-4
year-olds, the major transmitters of HAV," write Ron Dagan, from Ben-Gurion
University in Beer-Sheva, Israel, and colleagues.
From 1995 to 1998, the average incidence of HAV in Israel was 37.2 per
100,000 for Jews and 57.8 per 100,000 for non-Jews, with lifestyle differences
thought to account for the differing incidences. Annual incidence decreased with
increasing age.
In 1998, an inactivated HAV vaccine (Havrix) was licensed for children older
than 12 months, and it became part of the routine childhood vaccination program
on July 1, 1999, with two doses at ages 18 and 24 months. No catch-up program
was offered, and fewer than 10% outside the target population were sporadically
vaccinated. In the first semester of 2002, annual incidence dropped to less than
5 per 100,000 in all age groups.
Two other presentations at IDSA report on the success of 7-valent
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7), another example of the herd effect.
"During a period shortly after PCV7 licensure when universal vaccination of
infants was likely to be incomplete, there was not only a significant decrease
in invasive pneumococcal disease in young children, but also in older children
and adults," write Shideh Shapinoori, from North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health
System in New Hyde Park, New York, and colleagues. "These findings are
compatible with herd effect."
The investigators reviewed blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) isolates of
S. pneumoniae at microbiology laboratories serving seven Long Island, New
York, hospitals from July 1998 through April 2000, before availability of PCV7,
and from July 2000 through April 2002, after routine vaccination began.
Invasive isolates were recovered from 497 patients (115 children and 382
adults). During the second time period compared with the first time period, the
number of children younger than two years with invasive disease declined by 72%,
and the number of invasive infections in adults decreased by 32%.
The third study, from the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania, also
showed a dramatic decline in invasive pneumococcal disease in children aged 3 to
36 months after implementation of a universal vaccination program.
"The availability and continued use of PCV7 should lead to even more
impressive changes in the epidemiology of pneumococcal disease," the authors
write.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"