Vaccination News Home Page

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20021119_925.html

 
Click Here!    
Good Morning America World News Tonight 20/20 Primetime Nightline UpClose WNN This Week
November 19, 2002
   
 
HOMEPAGE
NEWS SUMMARY
US
INTERNATIONAL
MONEYScope
WEATHER
LOCAL NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
ESPN SPORTS
SCI / TECH
POLITICS
HEALTH
TRAVEL
   
 
FEATURED SERVICES
SHOPPING
DOWNLOADS
WIRELESS
Sponsored by NetZero!
   
 
INTERACT
VIDEO & AUDIO
BOARDS
CHAT
NEWS ALERTS
CONTACT ABC
Click Here! ABCNEWSstore.com


(AP Photo)
GOP Wins Senate Homeland Bill Fight
Senate Defeats Bid by Democrats to Kill GOP Provisions in Homeland Security Bill; Passage Near


The Associated Press


 
Print This Page
Email This Page
See Most Sent
 
Do Single Women Face Spinster Stigma?
Mom: My Son Was Killed Simply for Being Different
How Can You Prove a Memory Is Real?

W A S H I N G T O N, Nov. 19 — The Senate defeated an attempt by Democrats to kill what they called special interests measures in a homeland security bill, bringing a lame-duck Congress close to granting President Bush's demand for a new Cabinet agency to protect Americans from terrorists.

 

The Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have removed from the bill seven provisions that Democrats said were favors to friends of Republicans. The president and his key advisers actively lobbied wavering senators to defeat the amendment, saying its approval could doom passage of the bill this year.

With the amendment out of the way, the Senate was set to finish work on the legislation Tuesday, ending five months of contentious debate on how to carry out the most monumental reorganization of the federal government in over half a century.

The House last week provisionally finished its work for the year, and now can approve minor technical changes in the Senate version without calling lawmakers back to Washington.

"The terrorists are not going to wait for a process that goes on days, weeks or months," said Senate GOP Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi. "...We need to get this done and we need to do it now."

Had the Democratic amendment prevailed, House leaders would have had to decide whether to accept that version or initiate new negotiations.

Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, who will be the House majority leader in January, said Monday he was willing to call the House back into session to defend the president's position.

Most Democrats, while supporting the homeland security bill, balked at what they said were last-minute inclusions of special interest favors unrelated to the nation's security.

"It's the Senate's last chance to show the American people that we are serious about placing some controls on this massive new bureaucracy," said Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., leading opponent of the legislation.

The most controversial provision would have protected pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits over the side effects of vaccines they create. The protections would have been retroactive to lawsuits already in court. Democrats said that among the lawsuits that would have been thrown out were those involving claims that mercury-based preservatives used in vaccines cause autism in children.

The bill also includes liability protections for makers of airport screening equipment and airport security firms and weakens an amendment offered by the late Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., that would have barred companies that set up offshore tax havens from getting federal homeland security contracts.

Bush proposed the new department last June, saying the agency that will combine 170,000 federal workers from 22 existing agencies was needed to provide a united front against the terrorist threat to the nation. It would be the biggest federal government reorganization since Harry Truman created the Defense Department in 1947.

The House approved the legislation by a wide margin in July, but Senate debate stalled for months, first over the labor rights of employees in the new agency and now, over special interest provisions.

The Senate, trying to wrap up its work for the year, could also vote Tuesday on a bill that would have the government cover up to $90 billion annually in insurance claims from any future terrorist attacks.

The terrorism insurance bill has been one of the president's top priorities for more than a year. He says many new construction projects have been slowed because builders must pay exorbitant terrorism insurance premiums or find that such insurance is unavailable.

Under the bill, approved by the House last week, for the next three years taxpayers would cover up to 90 percent of insured losses from major attacks, with the insurance industry covering up to the first $15 billion in annual claims.

 

The Homeland Security bill is H.R. 5005.

The terrorism insurance bill is H.R. 3210

On the Net: Congress:


photo credit and caption:

Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge addresses Transportation Security Administration, and other airport employees at Washington's Reagan National Airport Monday, Nov. 18, 2002. The Transportation Security Administration launched a passenger education program Monday to help move people efficiently through crowded airports during the holidays. The agency will meet the Nov. 19 deadline for a federal screening work force at commercial airports. Ridge called that an historical milestone. (AP Photo/Joe Marquette)
 


 

Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  RELATED STORIES
U.S. Index
More Raw News
 
 US HEADLINES
Do Single Women Face Spinster Stigma?
Did the FBI Drag Its Feet on Saudi Money Probe?
How to Escape a Hotel Fire
U.S. Wine Champ's Picks for Turkey Day
U.S. Charges 3 in Historic ID Theft Case

 

 
Copyright © 2002 ABCNEWS Internet Ventures.
Click here for:  HELP   ADVERTISER INFO   CONTACT ABC   TOOLS   PR   TERMS OF USE   PRIVACY POLICY

Family of sites:      ABC.com        ABC Family        ESPN.com        Disney.com        FamilyFun.com        GO Mail        Movies.com
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.