| Saturday November 16, 12:15 PM
Florida firm seeks to microchip Americans
By Laura MacInnis
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Washington forum debated on Friday the benefits
and hazards posed by a new way of identifying people with a microchip
implanted under their skin to replace conventional paper identification.
The heated debate at the National Academies, a non-profit think-tank
advising the government on matters of technology and science, focused on the
threat to individual privacy versus the convenience of switching to a chip.
Implanted microchips have long been used in the animal kingdom, to track
wildlife and to help pet owners recover their lost animals, but the idea of
using them on humans has sparked fierce criticism from scientists and
privacy advocates alike.
"We have absolutely no data about this particular product and about the
implications over the long term if Americans are chipped," Marc Rotenberg,
director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, said.
Applied Digital Solutions Inc. says its glass capsule the size of a grain
of rice, injected into forearms and other fleshy body parts, could help
authorities find missing persons and speed up medical diagnosis treatment.
The VeriChip, a scannable device worn under the skin and encrypted with
personal information like medical records and emergency contacts, was
unveiled last year in Florida.
So far about 20 people have been "chipped", including an entire family in
Florida.
"I can't feel them at all," said Richard Seeling, an Applied Digital
executive who has implanted two microchips into his right forearm to test
the product. "Most of the time I forget they're there until someone asks
about it."
Seeling said the chips were both painless and safe but scientists at the
National Academies said too little was known about the device and warned it
could pose health risks like infections and immunity disorders for bearers.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ruled in October it would not
regulate the device so long as it was not used for medical purposes such as
diagnosis.
This left Applied Digital free to market the chip for personal
identification and security, for instance locating missing children or
identifying car accident victims.
"I do think there could be beneficial uses, particularly for Alzheimer's
patients, but on a large scale this is essentially a system of control,"
Rotenberg said.
Privacy advocates worry the microchip could spell the end of anonymity in
the United States, particularly if authorities began requiring people to
wear them to meet conditions of parole, employment or border crossings.
Seeling said each chip costs about $200, and that scanner devices needed
to read the data would be targeted for sale to police, hospitals, schools
and other agencies across the United States.
|