Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.lifesciencesnetwork.com/news-detail.asp?newsID=2878


 
   Monday, 25 November 2002 Search this Site
Life Sciences Network
Home
Site Search
About Us
News
 
Australian News
New Zealand News
World News
Calendar
Clipping Services
Biotech Info.
Subscribe to Newsletter
Education
 
Resources
Archives
Links
   
 
  World News > Flesh-eating disease linked to gene differences  
 
Genetic differences between people can explain why some develop a fatal "flesh-eating" disease following infection with a common bacterium, while others colonised by the same strain walk away with just a sore throat.

The study throws new light on the mechanism of Group A streptococci (GAS) infection, and could lead to treatments better tailored to the patient's needs.

A team led by Malak Kotb at the University of Tennessee looked at variants in HLA-II genes, a set of genes that encode proteins on the surface of human immune cells. Previous work has shown that these proteins can bind to certain toxins secreted by Strep A.

The researchers identified gene variants that offered protection against severe forms of infection. And they found others that made patients more likely to develop potentially fatal toxic shock syndrome or necrotising fasciitis, which causes rapid loss of flesh.

This shows you can use people's genetic make-up to predict what kind of disease they may get if they encounter this organism, says Patrick Schlievert, a microbiologist at the University of Iowa. "This the way the future of medicine is going," he says.

Gene variants do not account for the whole variation in GAS risk from person to person, however.

"We have already published work showing that if the patient does not have antibodies against the bacteria, they are at higher risk of the bacteria entering the bloodstream or soft tissue," Kotb told New Scientist.

"But once bacteria make it into these normally sterile areas, antibodies play very little role. Then, a variation in genes plays a major role," she says.

The HLA-II genes determine the extent of the immune inflammatory response to key proteins on the surface of GAS bacteria. The stronger the response, the more likely the patient is to develop very severe symptoms.

Her team compared variants - or haplotypes - of HLA-II genes in 279 patients with serious infections. Some of these people had toxic shock syndrome or necrotising fasciitis.

The team identified one particular "risk" haplotype that was present in one per cent of infected patients that did not have toxic shock, but in 21 per cent of patients who did.

And they found a "protective" haplotype. This was present in 34 per cent of infected people who did not develop severe disease, and only 10 per cent of those who did. "So not having this haplotype is a big risk," says Kotb.

Preliminary analysis suggests these particular haplotypes do not moderate infection with other bacteria. But previous research has linked HLA variants with multiple sclerosis, arthritis and type 1 diabetes.

A test to analyse a person's HLA-II genes takes about one hour. "Doctors could use this information to determine which patients infected with Group A streptococci need more aggressive treatments, particularly where treatments are expensive," Kotb says.

Research on the role of patient genetic variation is a "hot area of investigation" she says. "By studying this, we can also better understand the mechanism of the infection, in terms of which genes are playing a role in regulating the response to infection. And this will suggest new vaccines and therapeutics."

Source: New Scientist, 17 November 2002
 
site by: Blue River  
The Life Sciences Network (Inc)
PO. Box 5504 Wellington. New Zealand.
Phone: +64 4 9160100 Fax: +64 4 9160101
 
top | home | print
 
 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.