Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/76/6/1401

AJCN Nutrition Week 2003
 

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Full Text of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Similar articles found in:
AJCN Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Search Medline for articles by:
Osendarp, S. J. || Fuchs, G. J
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1401-1408, December 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

 


Original Research Communication

Effect of zinc supplementation between 1 and 6 mo of life on growth and morbidity of Bangladeshi infants in urban slums1,2,3

Saskia JM Osendarp, Mathuram Santosham, Robert E Black, MA Wahed, Joop MA van Raaij and George J Fuchs

1 From the International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B): Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh (SJMO, MAW, and GJF); the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands (SJMO and JMAR); the Department of International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore (MS and REB); and the Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans (GJF).

 

Background: Evidence for an effect of zinc supplementation on growth and morbidity in very young infants in developing countries is scarce and inconsistent.

Objective: We assessed the effect of zinc supplementation on growth and morbidity in poor Bangladeshi infants aged 4–24 wk.

Design: Infants from Dhaka slums were enrolled at 4 wk of age and randomly assigned to receive 5 mg elemental Zn/d (n = 152) or placebo (n = 149) until 24 wk of age. They were followed weekly for information on compliance and morbidity; anthropometric measurements were performed monthly. Serum zinc was assessed at baseline and at 24 wk of age.

Results: At 24 wk of age, serum zinc concentrations were higher in the zinc than in the placebo group (13.3 ± 3.8 and 10.7 ± 2.9 µmol/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Significantly greater weight gains were observed in the zinc than in the placebo group for 43 infants who were zinc deficient (< 9.18 µmol/L) at baseline (3.15 ± 0.77 and 2.66 ± 0.80 kg, respectively; P < 0.04). In the other infants, no significant differences were observed in mean weight and length gains during the study period. Zinc-deficient infants showed a reduced risk of incidence of acute lower respiratory infection after zinc supplementation (relative risk: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.92); among the non-zinc-deficient infants there were no significant differences between treatment groups.

Conclusions: Zinc-deficient Bangladeshi infants showed improvements in growth rate and a reduced incidence of acute lower respiratory infection after zinc supplementation. In infants with serum zinc concentrations > 9.18 µmol/L, supplementation improved only biochemical zinc status.

 

Key Words: Zinc supplementation • infants • morbidity • growth • Bangladesh





 

 


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.