Washington - Senate Democrats accused Republicans Friday of sneaking an
item into a homeland security bill that would protect pharmaceutical
companies from billions of dollars in legal claims.
Democrats moved to kill the item and six other "special-interest"
provisions in the bill, which could further delay creation of a new
homeland security department at a time of heightened fear over potential
terrorist attacks.
Republicans said the provisions would strengthen domestic security and
that Democratic objections could stall creation of a new department to
lead domestic anti-terrorism efforts by at least two months.
Democratic attacks Friday focused on a one-page item that would expand
vaccine producers' liability protection. A major beneficiary would be Eli
Lilly and Co., which was hit with several class-action lawsuits last year
alleging that a preservative formerly used in children's vaccines caused
autism.
Liability protection that is now given for vaccines would be extended to
vaccine ingredients, such as the disputed preservative thimerosal, which
guarded against contamination in commonplace vaccines. Eli Lilly was its
leading manufacturer until it stopped using the preservative about 10
years ago.
"This deserves much more debate than being placed into a bill at the last
minute for the pharmaceutical industry," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.),
calling the measure a "special favor" for campaign cash to Republicans.
The pharmaceutical industry has given $14 million to Republicans so far
this year and $5.2 million to Democrats, according to the non-partisan
Center for Responsive Politics.
An Eli Lilly spokesman dismissed the accusation of political payback but
acknowledged the measure would benefit the company.
Spokesman Edward Sagebiel said Eli Lilly was "surprised" to find the item
in the homeland security bill and had not lobbied for its inclusion.
Richard Diamond, a spokesman for House Majority Leader Richard Armey
(R-Texas), said the item was added because the homeland security bill
protected other makers of homeland security equipment from product
liability. "This is just another version of where a life-saving medicine
would be protected from being sued out of existence," Diamond said.
Democrats had Republican support for Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle's
measure to remove seven "special-interest" items from a 500-page homeland
security bill the House passed Wednesday.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) indicated he would support Daschle. Rep. Dan
Burton (R-Ind.), chairman of a committee that oversees homeland security,
echoed Democratic complaints, saying, "These provisions don't belong in
this bill," and that the vaccine liability protection "is not a homeland
security issue."
Democrats also sought to remove an item creating a homeland research
security center, saying the criteria were so narrowly drawn that it would
end up at Texas A&M University - in the home state of House Majority Whip
Tom DeLay as well as Armey. Republicans said 10 other universities would
be eligible.
Meanwhile, Congress completed passage of a measure creating an independent
commission to investigate the policies and circumstances leading up to
Sept. 11. President George W. Bush was expected to sign it into law.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"